Category Archives: Automobile exception

IN: Juvenile’s blood draw by consent without statutory parental notification suppressed

The juvenile’s consent to a blood draw was without parental notification as required by statute, and it was expressed as a mere formality. The blood draw is suppressed. L.W. v. State, 2022 Ind. App. LEXIS 379 (Nov. 23, 2022). Defendant’s … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Consent, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on IN: Juvenile’s blood draw by consent without statutory parental notification suppressed

CA6: Seeing person named in arrest warrant at place she was staying satisfied Payton

Officers had sufficient information under Payton that a woman for whom they had a warrant was on the premises she was supposedly living at when they entered. They’d seen her there, and CIs put her there. United States v. Essex, … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Automobile exception, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on CA6: Seeing person named in arrest warrant at place she was staying satisfied Payton

N.D.Tex.: Officers don’t have to say they have PC before an automobile exception search

The officers didn’t say they had probable cause at the beginning of the search of the vehicle, but on the totality they did. United States v. Wesley, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 200320 (N.D. Tex. Nov. 3, 2022).* The Fourth Amendment … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Nexus, Particularity, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on N.D.Tex.: Officers don’t have to say they have PC before an automobile exception search

GA: Consent to search backpack included laptop inside when def didn’t object

Defendant clearly consented to a search of his backpack. When the officer encountered his laptop and opened it to turn it on, defendant never objected. Winslow v. State, 2022 Ga. LEXIS 297 (Nov. 2, 2022). The underlying facts for reasonable … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Computer and cloud searches, Consent, Reasonable suspicion, Standards of review | Comments Off on GA: Consent to search backpack included laptop inside when def didn’t object

E.D.Ky.: Def shows nothing to support claim taint team violated attorney-client privilege in review after SW

Defendant argued that the execution of this search warrant resulted in disclosure of attorney-client privileged information because of alleged misuse of a taint team. But, he provides no context or anything to go on. Taint teams are recognized in such … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion, Taint team, Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: Def shows nothing to support claim taint team violated attorney-client privilege in review after SW

D.Neb.: Eviction of unruly hotel guest is loss of REP in room as soon as decision is made, even without statute authorizing it

Eviction of an unruly guest from a motel or hotel results in a loss of the renter’s reasonable expectation of privacy even if there is no statute governing it. Thus, the proprietor can hand over the keys to the police … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Eviction of unruly hotel guest is loss of REP in room as soon as decision is made, even without statute authorizing it

WA: ID officers participating in WA permitted at common law and not barred by 4A or statute

A child pornography investigation in Idaho led to a search warrant in a neighboring county in Washington. The Washington officers inviting Idaho officers to participate in aiding the search did not violate statute or the Fourth Amendment. It was permitted … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Conflict of laws, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on WA: ID officers participating in WA permitted at common law and not barred by 4A or statute

D.C.Cir.: Question of fact remains on whether PC dissipated before second handcuffing

“We reverse the district court’s grant of summary judgment on the false arrest claims for two reasons. First, there is a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether probable cause for the simple assault charge dissipated before Lin was … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.C.Cir.: Question of fact remains on whether PC dissipated before second handcuffing

DDC: Delay in return of seized cell phone not necessarily unreasonable; Rule 41(g) provides procedural due process

DC Metro police seized numerous cell phones from BLM protestors, and they sued to recover them. The DC police policy wasn’t followed, but only by negligence, and that doesn’t state a claim against it. Rule 41(g) applies despite lack of … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Cell phones, Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on DDC: Delay in return of seized cell phone not necessarily unreasonable; Rule 41(g) provides procedural due process

E.D.Pa.: Work product privilege in product of a SW is burden of defense

A special master reviewed the product of the search warrant for work product materials. The defendants have the burden of proof on work product, and they didn’t meet it. United States v. Vepuri, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 151833 (E.D. Pa. … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Cell site location information, Nexus, Privileges | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Work product privilege in product of a SW is burden of defense

NJ: Arrest warrant executed at home of third-party requires SW

Police entering defendant’s neighbor’s house to arrest him when he was visiting violated the Fourth Amendment. There was no exigency justifying it. State v. Bookman, 2022 N.J. LEXIS 678 (Aug. 24, 2022). Even if the knock-and-announce rule applies to entries … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Automobile exception, Knock and announce | Comments Off on NJ: Arrest warrant executed at home of third-party requires SW

D.N.J.: Holding a vehicle 4 days before searching it was not unreasonable

“While law enforcement held the Durango for four days after the seizure before searching it pursuant to a warrant, this delay did not render the continuing seizure of the Durango unreasonable. See Donahue, 764 F.3d at 300-01 (collecting cases and … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine, Independent source | Comments Off on D.N.J.: Holding a vehicle 4 days before searching it was not unreasonable

CA9: Having handgun in open carry state not RS without more

Washington is an open carry state, and the allegation defendant had a weapon on him was insufficient for a stop without some showing he was a danger to others per state law. United States v. Willy, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Reasonable suspicion, Search incident | Comments Off on CA9: Having handgun in open carry state not RS without more

S.D.Ga.: Govt’s motion to reopen suppression hearing after R&R is granted

The government didn’t like the R&R so it moved to put on additional evidence before the USMJ. Granted. “Therefore, in light of the Court’s ‘responsibility to make an informed decision’ on Wright’s suppression motion, Khan, 2018 WL 2214813, at *2, … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Automobile exception, Excessive force | Comments Off on S.D.Ga.: Govt’s motion to reopen suppression hearing after R&R is granted

DE: People inside isn’t exigency for nighttime SW

The justification for a nighttime search warrant was insufficient as a matter of law. The mere presence of people in the house is not exigency. State v. Harrison, 2022 Del. Super. LEXIS 302 (July 14, 2022). The USMJ found defendant … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Cell site simulators, Dog sniff, Franks doctrine, Nighttime search | Comments Off on DE: People inside isn’t exigency for nighttime SW

D.Ariz.: Pre-Carpenter CSLI required compliance with SCA and here state officers didn’t

The government pleads the CSLI order was pre-Carpenter and thus subject to the good faith exception. The court finds, however, that the Stored Communications Act was not complied with and the government does not get the benefit of the good … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Cell site location information, Good faith exception | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: Pre-Carpenter CSLI required compliance with SCA and here state officers didn’t

CA1: Voluntary act after unreasonable stop made evidence admissible

There was no reasonable suspicion for defendant’s seizure on the totality. But, “Sierra-Ayala’s intervening volitional act, in the absence of exploitative behavior by López-Maysonet, renders the discovery of the drugs sufficiently attenuated so as to dissipate the taint of the … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Good faith exception, Inevitable discovery, Inventory, Voluntariness | Comments Off on CA1: Voluntary act after unreasonable stop made evidence admissible

E.D.Tex.: Whether RV was immobile and used as a residence doesn’t matter where GFE applies

“In his third numbered objection, Lee argues that contrary to Officer Kennedy’s testimony, the RV was completely immobile at the time it was searched and that it was being used as a residence. But whether the RV was mobile or … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Waiver | Comments Off on E.D.Tex.: Whether RV was immobile and used as a residence doesn’t matter where GFE applies

ABA Journal: Are driverless car searches constitutional?

ABA Journal: Are driverless car searches constitutional? by Adam Banner:

Posted in Automobile exception | Comments Off on ABA Journal: Are driverless car searches constitutional?

D.Me.: Dropbox CP search reported to NCMEC wasn’t exceeded by police

Dropbox reported child pornography to NCMEC, and its search did not exceed Dropbox’s private search. United States v. Orne, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 100146 (D.Me. June 6, 2022).* The wiretap application is based on overwhelming probable cause. United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Consent, Independent source, Private search | Comments Off on D.Me.: Dropbox CP search reported to NCMEC wasn’t exceeded by police