Category Archives: Consent

MO: Traffic stop not custodial for Miranda

A traffic stop is not a custodial arrest requiring Miranda warnings. Defendant’s admissions he had drugs wasn’t excludable. State v. Ybarra, 2021 Mo. App. LEXIS 1031 (Nov. 23, 2021). Not objecting to the state offering a search warrant application into … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Consent, Custody, Waiver | Comments Off on MO: Traffic stop not custodial for Miranda

D.Colo.: 911 call about being shot by unknown assailant in a locked building was implied consent to enter or justified by emergency

Defendant called 911 to report he was shot by a masked assailant and asked for help. That was implied consent for EMTs and police to enter either by implied consent or the emergency exception. Once investigating, they concluded defendant more … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Emergency / exigency, Standing | Comments Off on D.Colo.: 911 call about being shot by unknown assailant in a locked building was implied consent to enter or justified by emergency

TX10: Def’s invitation to look in vehicle console for receipt for allegedly stolen property led to plain view of drugs

Defendant was suspected of leaving a Lowes with a stolen shop vac. He was seen at a nearby McDonalds and officers came up to him. He volunteered that the receipt was in his console and they could look for it. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Issue preclusion, Plain view, feel, smell, Private search | Comments Off on TX10: Def’s invitation to look in vehicle console for receipt for allegedly stolen property led to plain view of drugs

CA8: Merely asking for ID not a seizure

Merely asking for ID is not a seizure. “Officer Hotz’s conduct would not have communicated to a reasonable person that he could not leave. Officer Hotz was alone, she did not display a weapon, she did not touch the defendants, … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Seizure, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA8: Merely asking for ID not a seizure

D.Vt.: Def has to show his REP in his Facebook account; what are the privacy settings?

Defendant didn’t show a reasonable expectation of privacy in his Facebook account by showing what he did to keep the account private. Even if he did, there was probable cause for the Facebook warrant. United States v. Whitcomb, 2021 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Social media warrants | Comments Off on D.Vt.: Def has to show his REP in his Facebook account; what are the privacy settings?

W.D.Ky.: Fireman jumping through def’s car window to stop him was unjustified and a search and seizure

A volunteer fireman diving into defendant’s car to keep him from driving away was a search and seizure. And, the community caretaking function did not apply. “Here, Wahl lacked any specific and articulable facts that Fairrow would be dangerous to … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Emergency / exigency, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: Fireman jumping through def’s car window to stop him was unjustified and a search and seizure

CO: Anonymous, uncorroborated, and stale tip on school safety hotline not RS

An anonymous tip through a school safety hotline was also uncorroborated and stale and did not provide reasonable suspicion for a school search. In the Interest of C.C-S., 2021COA127, 2021 Colo. App. LEXIS 1440 (Oct. 20, 2021). See techdirt: Students … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion, School searches, Voluntariness | Comments Off on CO: Anonymous, uncorroborated, and stale tip on school safety hotline not RS

OH12: Consent to “check” car for weapons includes containers in it

Defendant’s open-ended consent to “check” the car for weapons was broad enough to permit looking in containers. State v. Williams, 2021-Ohio-3704, 2021 Ohio App. LEXIS 3610 (12th Dist. Oct. 18, 2021). Defendant made a lane violation when turning, and that … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Consent, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search | Comments Off on OH12: Consent to “check” car for weapons includes containers in it

D.Kan.: Def had a loaner car loaned by a person with no authority over it; no standing

Defendant had no standing in a car that was loaned to him by another who himself might not have even had standing. Defendant was looking for a car that wasn’t “hot,” and he was loaned one by a source that … Continue reading

Posted in Border search, Cell phones, Consent, Standing | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Def had a loaner car loaned by a person with no authority over it; no standing

W.D.Pa.: Warrantless production of state ALPR data to FBI not governed by Carpenter

The FBI requested the state search its Automated License Plate Reader database for defendant’s LPN to trace the movement of his car. Carpenter simply cannot be made to apply to ALPR data. 106 records were found. United States v. Bowers, … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Informational privacy, Staleness, Surveillance technology, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Warrantless production of state ALPR data to FBI not governed by Carpenter

VA: Claim of exigency belied by 45 minute wait and then seeking telephonic SW

The officers’ claim they didn’t have time to get a search warrant before entering because the magistrate was 30 minutes away was belied by the fact that they waited 45 minutes and then got a telephone authorization to search after … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Emergency / exigency, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on VA: Claim of exigency belied by 45 minute wait and then seeking telephonic SW

M.D.Pa.: Google Translate is not constitutionally sufficient to attempt to get consent from a non-English speaking motorist

Google Translate is not constitutionally sufficient to attempt to get consent from a non-English speaking motorist. Some of the translations here were non-sensical. Alternatively, however, the search was valid under the automobile exception. United States v. Ramirez-Mendoza, 2021 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Google Translate is not constitutionally sufficient to attempt to get consent from a non-English speaking motorist

CA8: Running a false affidavit through the prosecutor doesn’t create QI

Running an allegedly false affidavit through the prosecutor doesn’t create qualified immunity for the affidavit. Wheeler v. City of Searcy, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 29364 (8th Cir. Sept. 29, 2021). The New Jersey Division of Child Protection & Permanency (“DCPP”) … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Private search, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA8: Running a false affidavit through the prosecutor doesn’t create QI

TX5: Consent to a blood draw is also consent to its testing

Consent to a blood draw is also consent to its testing. Schulz v. State, 2021 Tex. App. LEXIS 7748 (Tex. App. – Dallas Sept. 21, 2021). “Citizens have long-cherished constitutional rights which deserve our protection. Law enforcement officers have difficult … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Drug or alcohol testing, Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on TX5: Consent to a blood draw is also consent to its testing

NE: Continuing stop past end of mission of stop was without consent

Once the mission of the traffic stop should have ended, the officer continued questioning and sought consent. The consent was not voluntary. State v. Thompson, 30 Neb. App. 135, 2021 Neb. App. LEXIS 223 (Sept. 14, 2021). Touching the hood … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion, Trespass | Comments Off on NE: Continuing stop past end of mission of stop was without consent

NE: Consent during unreasonable extension of stop not voluntary

The traffic stop was reasonable, but it was unreasonably extended. Defendant’s consent during that period was not attenuated. State v. Thompson, 30 Neb.App. 135 (Sept. 14, 2021):

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NE: Consent during unreasonable extension of stop not voluntary

OH2: Old arrest for weapons charge made patdown after jaywalking stop in high crime area reasonable

Jaywalking stop in a high crime drug area led to officers finding about years’ old prior arrest for weapons. It was not unreasonable to pat defendant down. There admittedly was no other suggestion of criminality. State v. Allen, 2021-Ohio-3047 (2d … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Consent, DNA, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on OH2: Old arrest for weapons charge made patdown after jaywalking stop in high crime area reasonable

MO: SW for cell phone at def’s house wasn’t properly executed on his phone at police station

This cell phone search warrant was for a black Samsung in a black case at defendant’s address. It was executed at the police department, not defendant’s house. The trial court properly suppressed and properly held the good faith exception did … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver, Warrant execution | Comments Off on MO: SW for cell phone at def’s house wasn’t properly executed on his phone at police station

ID: Where state constitution requires arrest warrant for completed misdemeanors, it was sufficient there was a reasonable belief officer was arresting for a completed felony

While an officer cannot arrest for a completed misdemeanor without an arrest warrant under the state constitution, the officer reasonably believed here that it could be a felony. SCOTUS’s recent opinion on the community caretaking function in Caniglia v. Strom … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Consent, Custody | Comments Off on ID: Where state constitution requires arrest warrant for completed misdemeanors, it was sufficient there was a reasonable belief officer was arresting for a completed felony

D.N.J.: Review in a motion to suppress is not de novo

The affidavit for search warrant was based on probable cause. Review in a motion to suppress is not de novo. United States v. Harper, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 162543 (D.N.J. Aug. 26, 2021). Defendant was stopped with reasonable suspicion, and … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Standards of review | Comments Off on D.N.J.: Review in a motion to suppress is not de novo