Category Archives: Consent

OH12: Trial court’s finding of no RS and no consent affirmed

The state failed to prove that the stop was with reasonable suspicion. “While Officer Ianson’s questioning was not expressly coercive, the circumstances surrounding the request to search made the questioning impliedly coercive. Thus, the circumstances suggest that Massey merely submitted … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Excessive force, Reasonable suspicion, Standards of review | Comments Off on OH12: Trial court’s finding of no RS and no consent affirmed

CA9: A visitor to premises has no standing in the curtilage

A visitor to premises has no standing in the curtilage. United States v. Castellanos, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 1278 (9th Cir. Jan. 18, 2022). The officer had reasonable suspicion to stop defendant when the officer shined a flashlight on him, … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Curtilage, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on CA9: A visitor to premises has no standing in the curtilage

IN: Even with a typo in the address of the place to be searched in the warrant, the correct otherwise particularly described place was searched

The address on the search warrant was wrong, but the physical description for defendant’s place was different than place with the wrong address. Defendant’s place was the target and it was searched under the warrant. The search warrant was sufficiently … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Particularity, Voluntariness, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on IN: Even with a typo in the address of the place to be searched in the warrant, the correct otherwise particularly described place was searched

CA2: Officers had reasonable belief the person granting consent was a co-occupant

Crediting the police officers’ version, the district court found that the officers had substantial reason to believe the person granting consent was an occupant of the place searched. United States v. Vega, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 38169 (2d Cir. Dec. … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine, Voluntariness | Comments Off on CA2: Officers had reasonable belief the person granting consent was a co-occupant

D.Mont.: Coercive situation made def’s consent in own home involuntary

On the totality, defendant’s consent was not freely given. The situation was coercive and in his own home. United States v. Simpson, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 243401 (D.Mont. Dec. 21, 2021)*:

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on D.Mont.: Coercive situation made def’s consent in own home involuntary

CA10: Buses and trains in ABQ

A DEA officer’s lifting but not manipulating defendant’s duffle bag on a Greyhound bus that stopped in Albuquerque for passengers and service was not timely raised by the defense. But it was not a search. “It is not unusual on … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Search | Comments Off on CA10: Buses and trains in ABQ

S.D.Ind.: Handcuffed def could have jacket pocket searched incident to arrest

The search of defendant’s jacket pockets when he was arrested was valid under the search incident doctrine even though he was handcuffed. United States v. Coates, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 232798 (S.D.Ind. Dec. 6, 2021). Defendant had a right to … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Search incident | Comments Off on S.D.Ind.: Handcuffed def could have jacket pocket searched incident to arrest

CA1: Protective sweep for weapons requires only objective reasonableness, and actual fear not required

A First Circuit panel overrules its caselaw as inconsistent with SCOTUS cases that a frisk for weapons must be both objective and with subjective fear: “United States v. Lott that officers cannot do a ‘frisk for weapons … where, although … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Issue preclusion, Protective sweep, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA1: Protective sweep for weapons requires only objective reasonableness, and actual fear not required

CA6: Failure to object to co-occupant’s apparent consent supported consent

An occupant of defendant’s house with apparent authority consented to an entry. When the officers expressed an interest in defendant’s cell phone, he didn’t voice any concerns. “He maintains that the male occupant’s invitation to the officers to enter Mason’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Informant hearsay, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA6: Failure to object to co-occupant’s apparent consent supported consent

D.Ariz.: Covid-19 testing is (essentially) so minimal it is not a 4A intrusion

“Nasal swab testing for COVID-19 does not create an intrusion under the skin, does not involve any genetic testing, and there is no use of the sample for law enforcement purposes. Accordingly, the Court finds that Gold is unlikely to … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Probation / Parole search, Search | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: Covid-19 testing is (essentially) so minimal it is not a 4A intrusion

MO: Traffic stop not custodial for Miranda

A traffic stop is not a custodial arrest requiring Miranda warnings. Defendant’s admissions he had drugs wasn’t excludable. State v. Ybarra, 2021 Mo. App. LEXIS 1031 (Nov. 23, 2021). Not objecting to the state offering a search warrant application into … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Consent, Custody, Waiver | Comments Off on MO: Traffic stop not custodial for Miranda

D.Colo.: 911 call about being shot by unknown assailant in a locked building was implied consent to enter or justified by emergency

Defendant called 911 to report he was shot by a masked assailant and asked for help. That was implied consent for EMTs and police to enter either by implied consent or the emergency exception. Once investigating, they concluded defendant more … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Emergency / exigency, Standing | Comments Off on D.Colo.: 911 call about being shot by unknown assailant in a locked building was implied consent to enter or justified by emergency

TX10: Def’s invitation to look in vehicle console for receipt for allegedly stolen property led to plain view of drugs

Defendant was suspected of leaving a Lowes with a stolen shop vac. He was seen at a nearby McDonalds and officers came up to him. He volunteered that the receipt was in his console and they could look for it. … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Issue preclusion, Plain view, feel, smell, Private search | Comments Off on TX10: Def’s invitation to look in vehicle console for receipt for allegedly stolen property led to plain view of drugs

CA8: Merely asking for ID not a seizure

Merely asking for ID is not a seizure. “Officer Hotz’s conduct would not have communicated to a reasonable person that he could not leave. Officer Hotz was alone, she did not display a weapon, she did not touch the defendants, … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Seizure, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA8: Merely asking for ID not a seizure

D.Vt.: Def has to show his REP in his Facebook account; what are the privacy settings?

Defendant didn’t show a reasonable expectation of privacy in his Facebook account by showing what he did to keep the account private. Even if he did, there was probable cause for the Facebook warrant. United States v. Whitcomb, 2021 U.S. … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Social media warrants | Comments Off on D.Vt.: Def has to show his REP in his Facebook account; what are the privacy settings?

W.D.Ky.: Fireman jumping through def’s car window to stop him was unjustified and a search and seizure

A volunteer fireman diving into defendant’s car to keep him from driving away was a search and seizure. And, the community caretaking function did not apply. “Here, Wahl lacked any specific and articulable facts that Fairrow would be dangerous to … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Emergency / exigency, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: Fireman jumping through def’s car window to stop him was unjustified and a search and seizure

CO: Anonymous, uncorroborated, and stale tip on school safety hotline not RS

An anonymous tip through a school safety hotline was also uncorroborated and stale and did not provide reasonable suspicion for a school search. In the Interest of C.C-S., 2021COA127, 2021 Colo. App. LEXIS 1440 (Oct. 20, 2021). See techdirt: Students … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion, School searches, Voluntariness | Comments Off on CO: Anonymous, uncorroborated, and stale tip on school safety hotline not RS

OH12: Consent to “check” car for weapons includes containers in it

Defendant’s open-ended consent to “check” the car for weapons was broad enough to permit looking in containers. State v. Williams, 2021-Ohio-3704, 2021 Ohio App. LEXIS 3610 (12th Dist. Oct. 18, 2021). Defendant made a lane violation when turning, and that … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Consent, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search | Comments Off on OH12: Consent to “check” car for weapons includes containers in it

D.Kan.: Def had a loaner car loaned by a person with no authority over it; no standing

Defendant had no standing in a car that was loaned to him by another who himself might not have even had standing. Defendant was looking for a car that wasn’t “hot,” and he was loaned one by a source that … Continue reading →

Posted in Border search, Cell phones, Consent, Standing | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Def had a loaner car loaned by a person with no authority over it; no standing

W.D.Pa.: Warrantless production of state ALPR data to FBI not governed by Carpenter

The FBI requested the state search its Automated License Plate Reader database for defendant’s LPN to trace the movement of his car. Carpenter simply cannot be made to apply to ALPR data. 106 records were found. United States v. Bowers, … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Informational privacy, Staleness, Surveillance technology, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Warrantless production of state ALPR data to FBI not governed by Carpenter