Category Archives: Franks doctrine

NY1: Cross-examination about potential suspects let go from scene of search opened door to suppressed statement

Defendant’s cross-examination about others not ultimately charged after the search opened the door to his suppressed statement. “First, defendant elicited that although the police arrested him and the other two persons who were in his apartment at the time a … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine, Waiver | Comments Off on NY1: Cross-examination about potential suspects let go from scene of search opened door to suppressed statement

CA3: Ghostwritten SW affidavit not a Franks violation because there was indisputably PC

A police officer’s admission at trial that the affidavit for search warrant was ghostwritten for him didn’t show a Franks violation because there clearly was probable cause. United States v. Ware, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 16568 (3d Cir. June 3, … Continue reading →

Posted in Attenuation, Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA3: Ghostwritten SW affidavit not a Franks violation because there was indisputably PC

CA9: Franks violation states § 1983 claim

The DA declined to prosecutor the plaintiff because of a Franks violation in the affidavit for the search warrant. Plaintiff sued, and qualified immunity is found not inapplicable. Dahlin v. Frieborn, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 16077 (9th Cir. May 28, … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Curtilage, Franks doctrine, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA9: Franks violation states § 1983 claim

W.D.Mo.: “Criminal history” in a warrant affidavit doesn’t necessarily mean convictions

The officer’s reference to “criminal history” in a warrant affidavit doesn’t necessarily mean convictions. Therefore, the court finds no Franks violation. Even striking that reference leaves probable cause. United States v. Woody, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 100605 (W.D. Mo. Apr. … Continue reading →

Posted in Community caretaking function, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: “Criminal history” in a warrant affidavit doesn’t necessarily mean convictions

E.D.Mich.: Just because a motorist can be ordered out of the car, that doesn’t permit the officer to open the door for him

Just because a motorist can be ordered out of the car, that doesn’t enable the officer to open the door for him. “As explained above, however, Trooper Miller’s stated purpose included an investigatory motive—verifying whether ‘something’ had been concealed—and his … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Just because a motorist can be ordered out of the car, that doesn’t permit the officer to open the door for him

CO: Prescription bottles in car door weren’t subject to plain view search

There was no justification for officers to pull prescription bottles from the door of his car during a traffic stop and manipulate them. Plain view didn’t support the seizure and search because the incriminating nature wasn’t immediately apparent even on … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on CO: Prescription bottles in car door weren’t subject to plain view search

CA11: Adding in the omitted information still showed PC

“Detective Tuck’s affidavit omitted some information favorable to Martelli, but even if we assume that those omissions were intentional or reckless, the claim still fails. It fails because, even including all the omitted information, a reasonable officer in Tuck’s position … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Nexus | Comments Off on CA11: Adding in the omitted information still showed PC

E.D.Tenn.: Omissions in Franks claims carry a higher burden

“Because defendant’s [Franks] claim relates to an alleged omission, he bears a heavy burden, as a Franks hearing is rarely merited in the case of an omission of exculpatory information. See Graham, 275 F.3d at 506. The Court does not … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Omissions in Franks claims carry a higher burden

WA: Prior knowledge of arrest warrant became stale

Stale information that a warrant existed for defendant was not probable cause when the warrant had been recalled, and no one checked the day of the arrest. State v. Pines, 2021 Wash. App. LEXIS 1160 (May 10, 2021). Subpoenas to … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Collective knowledge, Franks doctrine, Staleness | Comments Off on WA: Prior knowledge of arrest warrant became stale

W.D.La.: When cash and heroin found in car search, a notebook could be seized

When heroin and cash were found in the search of a car based on the smell of marijuana, seizure of a notebook was reasonable. The notebook was limited information compared to a cell phone. United States v. Pierre, 2021 U.S. … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search, Waiver | Comments Off on W.D.La.: When cash and heroin found in car search, a notebook could be seized

WI: Burning mj in a house is exigency of evidence being destroyed by burning

The smell of burning marijuana is exigent circumstances because the contraband is being destroyed by burning. State v. B.W.R., 2021 Wisc. App. LEXIS 201 (Apr. 28, 2021) (unpublished). Under Birchfield, “An increased penalty for the warrantless blood draw refusal revocation … Continue reading →

Posted in Collective knowledge, Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on WI: Burning mj in a house is exigency of evidence being destroyed by burning

MI: Anonymous tip for def’s stop was uncorroborated and unreasonable

The officer stopping defendant’s vehicle lacked reasonable suspicion that defendant was engaged in criminal activity based on an anonymous tip. Even assuming that the tipster was reliable led only to the conclusion that defendant appeared to be obnoxious and was … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on MI: Anonymous tip for def’s stop was uncorroborated and unreasonable

CA6: Affiant’s not checking the accuracy of information in a computer system before relying on it was not a Franks violation

The affiant’s not checking the accuracy of information in a computer system before relying on it was not a Franks violation. United States v. Thomas, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 11884 (6th Cir. Apr. 20, 2021):

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on CA6: Affiant’s not checking the accuracy of information in a computer system before relying on it was not a Franks violation

N.D.Ga.: Cell tower dumps to attempt to solve 12 robberies did not require SW

There were 12 robberies and officers got cell tower dumps to attempt to figure out the phone involved. Cell tower dumps did not require a search warrant. United States v. Rhodes, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75184 (N.D. Ga. Apr. 20, … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Hot pursuit, Particularity | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Cell tower dumps to attempt to solve 12 robberies did not require SW

D.N.M.: Detention hearing argument that there were “dispositive” 4A issues goes nowhere

Defendant’s argument responding to his detention order that there are significant potentially “dispositive” Fourth Amendment issues falls on deaf ears. United States v. Silguero, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72565 (D.N.M. Apr. 15, 2021).* Rodriguez complied with: “The information that Kilpela … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Detention hearing argument that there were “dispositive” 4A issues goes nowhere

M.D.Pa.: Franks hearing denied for speculation on what video evidence might show

Defendant doesn’t get a Franks hearing that the officer knew or should have known that his CI actually went into defendant’s apartment based on video surveillance that allegedly would disprove it. He doesn’t show that the video shows what he … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Franks hearing denied for speculation on what video evidence might show

S.D.Tex.: Affidavit of convicted felon who may have been conspirator and was deported wasn’t sufficient offer of proof under Franks in face of other evidence

Defendant’s claim was that alleged cocaine wrappers found were actually wrappers for peanut butter and jelly sandwiches and that’s a Franks violation. “The only evidence that Defendant has produced to support his contention that the bags contained sandwiches is the … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on S.D.Tex.: Affidavit of convicted felon who may have been conspirator and was deported wasn’t sufficient offer of proof under Franks in face of other evidence

D.P.R.: When def asks for a SW and refuses consent, officers can’t just ask others

Defendant repeatedly asked for a search warrant when the officers sought consent, so there was no consent. He was present and objecting, and they couldn’t look to another to provide consent. “Considering the agents’ repeated representations, the Court cannot expect … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on D.P.R.: When def asks for a SW and refuses consent, officers can’t just ask others

CT: Both halves of a duplex can’t be searched under a warrant for one

A search of both halves of a duplex under a search warrant for one was unreasonable and had to be suppressed. State v. Lyons, 2021 Conn. App. LEXIS 100 (Mar. 30, 2021). Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not challenging the … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Overseizure, Scope of search | Comments Off on CT: Both halves of a duplex can’t be searched under a warrant for one

W.D.La.: Govt showed justification for protective sweep of person then car

“The firearms and drugs were found during the protective sweep of the passenger area of the vehicle. The initial stop and pat-down of Defendant were justified under Terry, and the subsequent protective sweep of the car for weapons was a … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.La.: Govt showed justification for protective sweep of person then car