Category Archives: Franks doctrine

S.D.N.Y.: Def doesn’t show Colombia wiretap was U.S. instigated

Defendants produced nothing to show that U.S. officers enlisted Colombian officers to wiretap their phones there. United States v. Ruiz, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 186612 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 16, 2023).* Just because there were discrepancies between the testimony at the suppression … Continue reading →

Posted in Foreign searches, Franks doctrine, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Def doesn’t show Colombia wiretap was U.S. instigated

CA11: Officer gets QI for ordering passenger to produce ID

The officer in a Florida traffic stop could get the driver out of the vehicle as a matter of course under Mimms. Under Maryland v. Wilson, he could order the passenger out, too. It was not clearly established law that … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Plain view, feel, smell, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: Officer gets QI for ordering passenger to produce ID

ID: Inventory as pretext for investigatory searches unreasonble

An inventory search that is a pretext for an investigatory search is unreasonable. Remanded for reconsideration of this issue. State v. Ramos, 2023 Ida. LEXIS 123 (Sep. 29, 2023). techdirt: The Casual Cruelty Of Cops: Inventory Search Edition by Tim … Continue reading →

Posted in Collective knowledge, Franks doctrine, Inventory, Waiver | Comments Off on ID: Inventory as pretext for investigatory searches unreasonble

W.D.La.: Failure to make a timely return of SW papers is not a const’l error

Failure to make a timely return of the warrant to the issuing court is not a constitutional error, and there is no showing of prejudice. United States v. Warren, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 176014 (W.D. La. Aug. 18, 2023), adopted, … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity, Warrant papers | Comments Off on W.D.La.: Failure to make a timely return of SW papers is not a const’l error

W.D.Va.: No objective REP in hospital room against police entry to question about shooting

Plaintiff did not have an objective reasonable expectation of privacy in preventing entry into his hospital room by law enforcement officers investing his shooting. Stoots v. Sparti, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 175529 (W.D. Va. Sep. 29, 2023). “Nor does the … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Pretext, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on W.D.Va.: No objective REP in hospital room against police entry to question about shooting

PA: LPR systems don’t violate motorists REP

“Whether use of a License Plate Reader (‘LPR’) system to track Appellant’s movements is a search under the Fourth Amendment is a question of first impression before this Court. The purpose a license plate attached to a vehicle is to … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on PA: LPR systems don’t violate motorists REP

GA: Unjustified protective sweep suppressed

The “security sweep” of defendant’s dwelling violated the Fourth Amendment. No justification for the entry and no exigent circumstances were shown. Defendant’s alleged consent came after the unlawful entry. Denial of suppression reversed. Thompson v. State, 2023 Ga. App. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine, Protective sweep | Comments Off on GA: Unjustified protective sweep suppressed

WV: When asked for consent to search his house, def said ‘F*** it. Come on.’ That was consent.

“After some discussion of his choice to voluntarily agree to a search or wait until a search warrant was obtained, petitioner left the trooper’s vehicle, saying words to the effect of ‘F*** it. Come on.’ He walked toward his house … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on WV: When asked for consent to search his house, def said ‘F*** it. Come on.’ That was consent.

NE: Franks challenge that included allegations that alternative suspects weren’t identified fails

Defendant’s Franks challenge that included allegations that alternative suspects weren’t identified fails. State v. Garcia, 315 Neb. 74 (Sep. 7, 2023). There was no reasonable suspicion to detain defendant for a dog sniff. He answered all the officer’s questions, and … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Franks doctrine, Nexus, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NE: Franks challenge that included allegations that alternative suspects weren’t identified fails

D.Nev.: Ability to manage day-to-day operations doesn’t give standing over whole business space

(1) “Accordingly, although Defendant had the discretion to manage the day-to-day operation of LLB, the Court finds he did not actually manage the day-to-day operations of the business.” “In this context, ownership of premises alone does not automatically confer standing. … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Neutral and detached magistrate, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Ability to manage day-to-day operations doesn’t give standing over whole business space

D.Mass.: SW affidavit based on CI’s tale gets a Franks hearing

Defendant made his “substantial preliminary showing” for a possible Franks violation on the credibility of a CI to at least get a hearing. (And it sounds like he’d prevail at the hearing because the affidavit depended entirely on the CI’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on D.Mass.: SW affidavit based on CI’s tale gets a Franks hearing

S.D.W.Va.: Failure to update a prior SW affidavit was careless but not intentionally misleading

The failure to update the original search warrant affidavit with information from an intervening search showed “multiple careless errors, [and the court] could not say that these errors establish recklessness or materiality. There is simply no evidence upon which the … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on S.D.W.Va.: Failure to update a prior SW affidavit was careless but not intentionally misleading

D.Minn.: Govt’s learning of another potential crime from “sneak and peak” SW wasn’t entrapment

The government suspected defendant of acquiring a pill press and got a sneak and peak warrant to look around and photograph inside his place. Later, they got a search warrant for the place and seized drugs. The government’s knowledge of … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Dog sniff, Franks doctrine, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Sneak and Peek | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Govt’s learning of another potential crime from “sneak and peak” SW wasn’t entrapment

CA9: Franks challenge has to include showing lack of PC

On a Franks challenge, “Defendant failed to establish that, if additional information about the informant’s credibility had been included, the affidavit would have been insufficient to establish probable cause.” United States v. Carter, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 22478 (9th Cir. … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Burden of proof, Franks doctrine, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA9: Franks challenge has to include showing lack of PC

CA7: PC can exist even if officer doesn’t believe “putative victim”

“But Garcia has a high hurdle to combat a probable-cause determination because G.C., the putative victim, identified him as responsible. … An officer need not even believe that a witness is reliable to determine that her statement supports probable cause … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Standing | Comments Off on CA7: PC can exist even if officer doesn’t believe “putative victim”

CA6: The fact a prior car search came up empty isn’t material for Franks

“Daniel has not demonstrated that the omission of the initial car search’s fruitlessness from the affidavit amounted to a deliberate falsehood or showed reckless disregard for the truth.” United States v. Daniel, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 21751 (6th Cir. Aug. … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Franks doctrine, Standing | Comments Off on CA6: The fact a prior car search came up empty isn’t material for Franks

NM: Passenger’s lie about age was RS to continue stop

The passenger’s admitted lie about his age was reasonable suspicion to continue the stop. He wasn’t forthcoming in giving his age and first lied about it. It was permissible to ask the passenger about his identifiers. State v. Vasquez-Salas, 2023 … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NM: Passenger’s lie about age was RS to continue stop

TN: Typo of street number of location of car to be searched could be overlooked when the car was still parked

Defendant was a suspect in a vehicular homicide. Her car with pedestrian damage was found parked in the driveway of her house at 207 Port Drive in Hamilton County. There was a typo on the street number despite the warrant … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Particularity, Probable cause | Comments Off on TN: Typo of street number of location of car to be searched could be overlooked when the car was still parked

NY4: No limitation in cell phone search was included, and it was thus not particular

The cell phone warrant sought all information on it about a 48 hour period without limitation, and it was vague and overbroad. “The warrant contained no language incorporating any other documents or facts. Significantly, the search of the phone was … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Cell site location information, Franks doctrine, Particularity | Comments Off on NY4: No limitation in cell phone search was included, and it was thus not particular

NY Albany: Text message confession to molestation to wife was still covered by marital privilege when she disclosed to police

Defendant confessed to his wife by text message to molestation of his nephew. Despite her consenting to turn it over to the police, he had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the message and marital privilege still applied. People v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Motion to suppress, Privileges, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on NY Albany: Text message confession to molestation to wife was still covered by marital privilege when she disclosed to police