Author Archives: Hall

WaPo: They confided in ChatGPT. Their secrets ended up in court.

WaPo: They confided in ChatGPT. Their secrets ended up in court. By Miriam Waldvogeland Gerrit De Vynck:

Posted in AI | Comments Off on WaPo: They confided in ChatGPT. Their secrets ended up in court.

CA6: No interlocutory appeal of denial of motion to suppress

There is no interlocutory appeal of denial of a motion to suppress in the federal system. United States v. Cox, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 25677 (6th Cir. Aug. 24, 2026). Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not making a frivolous motion … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Motion to suppress, Nexus | Comments Off on CA6: No interlocutory appeal of denial of motion to suppress

CA11: Service of SW without attachments isn’t 4A violation

Defendant’s effort to subpoena five witnesses in support of his Franks challenge was properly denied. Their testimony would be material to the outcome, and they were also speculative. As to the execution of the warrant, the fact he got a … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Immigration arrests, immigration stops, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA11: Service of SW without attachments isn’t 4A violation

KS: Running warrants on a passed out person is reasonable

Defendant was passed out under a bridge, and the fire department and police were called. Firemen got her name and police ran a warrants check, finding one, and they arrested her. That was reasonable. State v. Willard, 2026 Kan. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Cell phones, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on KS: Running warrants on a passed out person is reasonable

M.D.Fla.: Unidentified pills in driver’s lap may have been RS but it wasn’t PC for arrest

Defendant was stopped for speeding, and he was arrested for drugs based on unidentified pills found in his lap when the officer looked in. That might have been reasonable suspicion, but it wasn’t probable cause. Therefore, the arrest and car … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Cell phones, Excessive force, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Unidentified pills in driver’s lap may have been RS but it wasn’t PC for arrest

D.C.Cir.: It was reasonable for officers to conclude that evidence or instrumentalities of the crime would be found in the car used in a robbery

It was reasonable for officers to conclude that evidence or instrumentalities of the crime would be found in the car used in a robbery. A mistaken description of the location of the car in the warrant was neither intentional nor … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority, Automobile exception, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search | Comments Off on D.C.Cir.: It was reasonable for officers to conclude that evidence or instrumentalities of the crime would be found in the car used in a robbery

CA7: Officer’s warrantless view of CSAM flagged by hash value was not unreasonable

Google and others flagged apparent CSAM by hash value alone and reported them to NCMEC which forwarded them to police where the IP address was. The officer viewed the images without a warrant and found them with names suggesting they … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA7: Officer’s warrantless view of CSAM flagged by hash value was not unreasonable

D.Utah: Minor time detours to writing up a traffic ticket didn’t unreasonable extend this stop; the dog was quickly on its way

Minor detours to the traffic stop, but all related to it, didn’t unreasonably extend the stop. The dog was quickly called for. United States v. Alba, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 189133 (D. Utah Aug. 21, 2026). How the court handled … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Utah: Minor time detours to writing up a traffic ticket didn’t unreasonable extend this stop; the dog was quickly on its way

KY: Despite lack of nexus, SW sustained under GFE

A search warrant for defendant’s place was because Customs had flagged a child sex doll coming to his house. While the state supreme court held that while nexus was lacking, it remanded for determination of the good faith exception. Looking … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Dog sniff, Good faith exception, Nexus, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on KY: Despite lack of nexus, SW sustained under GFE

CO: DNA could be seized from trash

Collecting defendant’s DNA from his trash out for collection didn’t violate the Fourth Amendment or the Colorado Constitution. People v. Anderson, 2026 COA 64 (Aug. 20, 2026) (2-1 on the state issue; a warrant should be required). Plaintiff’s claim that … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, DNA, Dog sniff, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CO: DNA could be seized from trash

CA8: Nebraska statute allowing SWs to cross state lines doesn’t violate 4A

Nebraska statute authorizes search warrants to cross state lines, and this does not violate the Fourth Amendment. This was a Snapchat warrant. [The Stored Communications Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2703(a,d), allows state subpoenas to cross state lines.] United States v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Consent, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA8: Nebraska statute allowing SWs to cross state lines doesn’t violate 4A

WA: Sweat patch as condition of release violated state constitution’s privacy provision

The court imposing a sweat patch on plaintiff violated his state constitutional privacy rights. Lesser intrusive measures are required. Bailey-Cobb v. Snohomish Cty. Dist. Court, 2026 Wash. App. LEXIS 1871 (Aug. 17, 2026). Plaintiff stated a claim for his severe … Continue reading →

Posted in Body searches, Excessive force, Franks doctrine, Reasonable expectation of privacy, State constitution | Comments Off on WA: Sweat patch as condition of release violated state constitution’s privacy provision

E.D.Mich.: Michigan liquor control administrative searches here don’t comply with Burger/Patel

The administrative search provisions of the Michigan liquor control statute don’t measure up to the Burger/Patel standards for administrative searches. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment denied. Generis Ent., LLC v. Donley, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 185142 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 18, … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Michigan liquor control administrative searches here don’t comply with Burger/Patel

Reason: Border Agents Searched His Phone 5 Times Without a Warrant. He’s Asking the Supreme Court To Put a Stop to It.

Reason: Border Agents Searched His Phone 5 Times Without a Warrant. He’s Asking the Supreme Court To Put a Stop to It. by Elizabeth Nolan Brown (“The Fourth Amendment says authorities can’t search you or your things without probable cause … Continue reading →

Posted in Border search, Cell phones | Comments Off on Reason: Border Agents Searched His Phone 5 Times Without a Warrant. He’s Asking the Supreme Court To Put a Stop to It.

CA11: SD card in a video voyeur device placed in another’s bedroom has no REP

“This appeal is about the reasonable expectation of privacy–or the lack thereof. Kenneth Mininger secretly placed video cameras in shared rooms in his ex-wife’s house. He used these cameras to record his ex-wife’s minor daughter undressing. The police examined the … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on CA11: SD card in a video voyeur device placed in another’s bedroom has no REP

CA7: False confession claim is a 4A not 14A claim

Plaintiff’s claim of false confessions sounds in the Fourth Amendment not Fourteenth. But here, the alleged false confession was never used in court. Therefore, no liability. Savory v. Andrews, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 24655 (7th Cir. Aug. 14, 2026)*:

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on CA7: False confession claim is a 4A not 14A claim

CA5: RS required of weapons or contraband for search of vagina

This strip search of a female detainee stated a claim and overcame qualified immunity. Brown v. Wallace, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 24643 (5th Cir. Aug. 14, 2026):

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on CA5: RS required of weapons or contraband for search of vagina

CA4: Affidavit for SW provided neither nexus nor timing and even failed GFE

The affidavit for warrant here provided neither nexus nor timing to address 6740. As to all around it, yes, but not there. As to timing, as to the others, yes, but all the police had as to 6740 was 13-year-old … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Nexus, Staleness | Comments Off on CA4: Affidavit for SW provided neither nexus nor timing and even failed GFE

CA9: Ptfs didn’t meet burden of showing administrative subpoena was 4A violation or in bad faith

Bad faith administrative subpoenas are grounded in the Fourth Amendment, but the burden is high in showing bad faith, and plaintiffs didn’t meet it. Queerdoc, PLLC v. DOJ, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 24567 (9th Cir. Aug. 14, 2026) (“The prohibition … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion, Standing, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on CA9: Ptfs didn’t meet burden of showing administrative subpoena was 4A violation or in bad faith

CA2: No 4A requirement for SWs being issued with notice to target

Search warrants are usually issued ex parte, and there’s no Fourth Amendment justification for advance notice to the target of the search. It avoids warning the target to destroy or hide evidence or flee. United States v. Leeper, 2026 U.S. … Continue reading →

Posted in Warrant papers | Comments Off on CA2: No 4A requirement for SWs being issued with notice to target