Author Archives: Hall

W.D.N.Y.: The fact a SW affidavit for guns also suggests drugs doesn’t make a Franks issue; a SW can have a dual purpose but rely more heavily on one

Defendant fails to satisfy his Franks burden that the affidavit for the search warrant was intended to be misleading. The affidavit was for trafficking in firearms, but a CI’s statement also references drugs. Defendant’s conclusory allegations don’t satisfy the “substantial … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: The fact a SW affidavit for guns also suggests drugs doesn’t make a Franks issue; a SW can have a dual purpose but rely more heavily on one

AL: Failure to have arrest warrant in hand under state law voids the arrest and the search incident that occurred; Heien inapplicable

Defendant was unreasonably and mistakenly arrested without the officer having the arrest warrant in hand as required by state law, and the search incident to the arrest is suppressed. The court finds Heien and the good faith exception inapplicable because … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonableness | Comments Off on AL: Failure to have arrest warrant in hand under state law voids the arrest and the search incident that occurred; Heien inapplicable

N.D.Okla.: Impoundment and inventory was non-pretextual and reasonable

The impoundment and inventory of defendant’s rented car was reasonable under all the circumstances at the time it happened, and it was factually justified and not pretextual. It would have been left in a high crime area on private property, … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory | Comments Off on N.D.Okla.: Impoundment and inventory was non-pretextual and reasonable

Cal.1: An electronic device probation search condition is reasonable to aid rehabilitation; but here it needs to be narrower

An electronic search condition for this juvenile involved in car burglaries was reasonable in its inception, but it had to be narrowed. The court finds an electronic search condition reasonable because of the inordinate amount of time he spends on … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on Cal.1: An electronic device probation search condition is reasonable to aid rehabilitation; but here it needs to be narrower

D.Neb.: Advance notice def driving into state doesn’t require SW for car under automobile exception

Defendant concedes officers had probable cause. Just because they had advance notice defendant was coming because of the breadth of their investigation, the automobile exception allowed a vehicle search because of the mobility of the car. Advance notice still doesn’t … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Advance notice def driving into state doesn’t require SW for car under automobile exception

N.D.Ga.: Hearsay is admissible in suppression hearings under Rule 104(a)

Hearsay is specifically admissible in suppression hearings [and issuing search warrants] under Rule 104(a). [After all, that’s how informant hearsay and collective knowledge work.] The court credits one officer as to what another told him in the probable cause for … Continue reading →

Posted in Suppression hearings, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Hearsay is admissible in suppression hearings under Rule 104(a)

CA9: IRS agent’s need to watch ptf pee during SW was unreasonable; they didn’t do that to her husband when he did

Plaintiff’s claim that an IRS CID investigator had to watch her go to the bathroom just in case she was hiding evidence survived a qualified immunity challenge. The right to bodily privacy was established at the time, and the officer’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Body searches, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: IRS agent’s need to watch ptf pee during SW was unreasonable; they didn’t do that to her husband when he did

FL5: Car search was justified by search incident; automobile exception finding not even appealed

Defendant’s traffic stop was justified for stopping in the crosswalk before turning on red. The search of the car was found by the trial court with probable cause and justified by the search incident doctrine and the automobile exception. Defendant … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Search incident, Standards of review | Comments Off on FL5: Car search was justified by search incident; automobile exception finding not even appealed

OH6: Search claim can’t be raised on post-conviction, but def would lose on merits anyway

Defendant in post-conviction raises seizure of a Western Union document from Kroger. First, that’s defaulted. Second, it’s admissible through the third-party doctrine. State v. Young, 2019-Ohio-3819, 2019 Ohio App. LEXIS 3873 (6th Dist. Sept. 20, 2019).* Defendant’s guilty plea waives … Continue reading →

Posted in Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on OH6: Search claim can’t be raised on post-conviction, but def would lose on merits anyway

CA6: Seizing ptf out of her home for a psych eval without PC stated claim and overcame QI

Plaintiff stated a claim that she was unreasonably seized in her home without probable cause or a warrant for a psych evaluation. Qualified immunity denied. Rudolph v. Atkinson, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 28477 (6th Cir. Sept. 20, 2019)*:

Posted in Community caretaking function, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA6: Seizing ptf out of her home for a psych eval without PC stated claim and overcame QI

CA2: US citizen jailed without PC as an undocumented immigrant states a FTCA claim

A federal tort claims act case was properly stated for an American citizen plaintiff’s four day detention in an immigration facility as lacking probable cause. Hernandez v. United States, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 28081 (2d Cir. Sept. 17, 2019). Defendant … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Immigration arrests, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA2: US citizen jailed without PC as an undocumented immigrant states a FTCA claim

D.Minn.: A car hauler has actual and apparent authority to consent to a car in his possession for transport

The car that was searched was being hauled by a car carrier. By turning over a car to a car hauler, the car hauler has complete possession and actual and apparent authority to consent to a search, and the person … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on D.Minn.: A car hauler has actual and apparent authority to consent to a car in his possession for transport

W.D.Ky.: Questions about def having a firearm were unrelated to the basis of the stop; suppression granted

Defendant’s stop was pretextual, but it was with an objective basis. He was leaving a funeral at night with overtinted windows, and the officer couldn’t see inside. He was repeatedly asked about firearms in the car, something unrelated to the … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: Questions about def having a firearm were unrelated to the basis of the stop; suppression granted

E.D.Mo.: No const’l requirement copy of SW be left at site of search

2255 petitioner’s claims include one that the search should have been suppressed for state officers not leaving a copy of the search warrant at the site of the search. That’s not a constitutional defect. It’s a Rule 41 requirement, but … Continue reading →

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: No const’l requirement copy of SW be left at site of search

W.D.Ky.: “Both the issuing judge and the reviewing court should take a totality of the circumstances approach in their review of the affidavit, rather than scrutinize the affidavit line-by-line.”

“Both the issuing judge and the reviewing court should take a totality of the circumstances approach in their review of the affidavit, rather than scrutinize the affidavit line-by-line.” A generalized allegation of “errors” is insufficient to get a Franks hearing. … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: “Both the issuing judge and the reviewing court should take a totality of the circumstances approach in their review of the affidavit, rather than scrutinize the affidavit line-by-line.”

OH10: While Carpenter is a “new rule,” it’s not been applied in post-conviction proceedings

While Carpenter is a “new rule,” courts on post-conviction haven’t been applying it, and this court does not either. State v. Neil, 2019-Ohio-3793, 2019 Ohio App. LEXIS 3843 (10th Sept. 19, 2019):

Posted in Cell site location information | Comments Off on OH10: While Carpenter is a “new rule,” it’s not been applied in post-conviction proceedings

TN: Defendant’s consent was voluntary; he was twice told he could refuse

Defendant consented to a search of his motel room, and he was twice told he had the right to refuse a consent search. State v. Savage, 2019 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 582 (Sept. 19, 2019). Defendant wasn’t seized when he … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on TN: Defendant’s consent was voluntary; he was twice told he could refuse

E.D.Ky.: Ten months of Facebook seizure was way overbroad, but the govt gets the benefit of the GFE

Knowing that defendant and his confederates talked about drug transactions on Facebook messenger, the limited search warrant for that was based on probable cause, and a message was recovered referring to acquiring a “ball” and it was almost certainly an … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Social media warrants | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: Ten months of Facebook seizure was way overbroad, but the govt gets the benefit of the GFE

D.Del.: Coast Guard’s search of a ship after failure of an oily water test was reasonable under the 4A

The Coast Guard boarded a Bahamian ship when it arrived in port in Delaware to inspect its potential for oil discharge and pollution. At issue was the oily water separator which was observed in operation, and this led to the … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Consent | Comments Off on D.Del.: Coast Guard’s search of a ship after failure of an oily water test was reasonable under the 4A

W.D.Tenn.: Affidavit for SW doesn’t need to support drug dog’s training, too

The affidavit for a search warrant based in part on a dog sniff doesn’t have to also justify the dog’s training to show probable cause. Failure to provide it isn’t a Franks violation. United States v. Tullous, 2019 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, F.R.Crim.P. 41 | Comments Off on W.D.Tenn.: Affidavit for SW doesn’t need to support drug dog’s training, too