Author Archives: Hall

NY3: Working meth lab provided exigency for warrantless entry

Officers went to defendant’s house to do a knock-and-talk based on a tip he had a working meth lab. When they knocked, he ran out the back door. The officer positioned there shouted for him to stop and drop what … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on NY3: Working meth lab provided exigency for warrantless entry

NE: Where the smell of MJ justifies the search, the finding of a small quantity doesn’t require the search end

Defendant’s stop was for over-tinted windows. The officer could smell burnt marijuana, and he searched finding some in the console. Finding that, he was not obligated to stop searching. State v. Valentine, 27 Neb. App. 332, 2019 Neb. App. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Scope of search, Standing | Comments Off on NE: Where the smell of MJ justifies the search, the finding of a small quantity doesn’t require the search end

OH8: Realtime CSLI was used only to locate def; nothing to suppress

Defendant was called by the police for an interview about a child molestation accusation, and he agreed to meet. He didn’t show. Then the police were concerned maybe he was fleeing and they sought realtime CSLI to locate him. “We … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on OH8: Realtime CSLI was used only to locate def; nothing to suppress

E.D.Wis.: Handgun hidden in a dog house wasn’t subject to search for exigency

Defendant’s handgun was hidden in a doghouse on the curtilage. The court distinguishes other cases allowing a search for a firearm, particularly one where a loaded shotgun was publicly put in the trunk of a car and the keys left … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Emergency / exigency, Inventory | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: Handgun hidden in a dog house wasn’t subject to search for exigency

E.D.Mich.: Def’s giving false name justifies extending stop

Defendant’s giving a false name extended the stop and added to the reasonable suspicion to detain him after his true identity was discovered. United States v. Jackson, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 188225 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 30, 2019). The affidavit for … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Nexus, Reasonable suspicion, Staleness | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Def’s giving false name justifies extending stop

D.N.J.: US can’t be sued under Bivens

Plaintiff can’t bring a Fourth Amendment Bivens claim against the United States because of sovereign immunity. There is always FTCA, but it has prerequisites. Leave to amend granted. Whitaker v. United States, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 188071 (D. N.J. Oct. … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Consent, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on D.N.J.: US can’t be sued under Bivens

NY2: Def has right of access to SW affidavit to attempt to controvert it

Defendant filed his motion to suppress in the blind because didn’t have access to the affidavit for the search warrant. It was denied without a hearing. Remanded: He gets to see it to try to controvert it. People v. Lambey, … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Burden of proof, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on NY2: Def has right of access to SW affidavit to attempt to controvert it

CA11: Factual dispute as to where misd arrest occurred, in the house or out, denies QI; it appears force used was excessive

Arguable probable cause supported plaintiff’s misdemeanor arrest, but there is a factual dispute denying qualified immunity to the officers of where exactly the arrest started and how it ended up indoors. That remains for trial. The complaint also survives on … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: Factual dispute as to where misd arrest occurred, in the house or out, denies QI; it appears force used was excessive

CA3: State law required RS for a parole search

Defendant was a parolee, and the parties argued over whether no suspicion was required for a parole search or reasonable suspicion. The government argued no suspicion required. The parole conditions didn’t specify, but state statute did, and reasonable suspicion is … Continue reading →

Posted in Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA3: State law required RS for a parole search

WA: A purse and a closed pouch within are subject to search incident

Defendant was subject to a valid search incident, and that included not only her purse, but also a pouch within her purse. State v. Richards, 2019 Wash. App. LEXIS 2772 (Oct. 29, 2019). Officers saw defendant and others and ordered … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Search incident, Seizure | Comments Off on WA: A purse and a closed pouch within are subject to search incident

N.D.Ill.: Franks challenge requires there was a SW

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not seeking a Franks hearing where there was no search warrant in the first place. Freeman v. United States, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 187171 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 29, 2019). Defendant’s general consent to search a … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Franks doctrine, Scope of search, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: Franks challenge requires there was a SW

CA11: RS supported a protective sweep for def after a police foot chase and officers having reason to believe he could have doubled back to the hotel room from where he started

Defendant discovered he was under surveillance at his motel and he fled. Officers came back to his room in 10 minutes, and seeing his car entered his room thinking he had doubled back. He did not abandon his privacy interest … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Abandonment, Protective sweep | Comments Off on CA11: RS supported a protective sweep for def after a police foot chase and officers having reason to believe he could have doubled back to the hotel room from where he started

GA: REP in a hotel room expires at checkout time

The reasonable expectation of privacy in a hotel room expires with the checkout time. Lindsey v. State, 2019 Ga. App. LEXIS 623 (Oct. 29, 2019). The defendant officers were properly entitled to summary judgment on plaintiff’s excessive force claim. Also, … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Excessive force, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on GA: REP in a hotel room expires at checkout time

The Atlantic: Did Body Cameras Backfire?

The Atlantic: Did Body Cameras Backfire? by Sidney Fussell (“Body cameras were supposed to fix a broken system. What happened?”)

Posted in Body cameras | Comments Off on The Atlantic: Did Body Cameras Backfire?

WaPo: ACLU sues FBI, DOJ over facial-recognition technology, criticizing ‘unprecedented’ surveillance and secrecy

WaPo: ACLU sues FBI, DOJ over facial-recognition technology, criticizing ‘unprecedented’ surveillance and secrecy by Drew Harwell (“The American Civil Liberties Union on Thursday sued the Justice Department, the Drug Enforcement Administration and the FBI for records detailing their use of … Continue reading →

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on WaPo: ACLU sues FBI, DOJ over facial-recognition technology, criticizing ‘unprecedented’ surveillance and secrecy

Reason: Reasonable Suspicion From Driver to Car: A Few Thoughts on Kansas v. Glover

Reason: Reasonable Suspicion From Driver to Car: A Few Thoughts on Kansas v. Glover by Orin S. Kerr Some interesting issues raised by the only Fourth Amendment case currently on the Supreme Court’s docket.

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, SCOTUS | Comments Off on Reason: Reasonable Suspicion From Driver to Car: A Few Thoughts on Kansas v. Glover

Lexology: Courts continue to consider intersection of Fourth Amendment and technology: without a warrant, retrieval of car’s electronic data unconstitutional, but surveillance on hunting property permissible

Lexology: Courts continue to consider intersection of Fourth Amendment and technology: without a warrant, retrieval of car’s electronic data unconstitutional, but surveillance on hunting property permissible by Brian J. Willett

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Lexology: Courts continue to consider intersection of Fourth Amendment and technology: without a warrant, retrieval of car’s electronic data unconstitutional, but surveillance on hunting property permissible

VA: Def’s refusal to submit to a SW for DNA could be argued as consciousness of guilt at trial

Defendant’s conscious refusal to submit to a DNA buccal swab sought by a search warrant could be argued as consciousness of guilt. Haas v. Commonwealth, 2019 Va. App. LEXIS 237 (Oct. 29. 2019). The officer’s knowledge from nearly six months … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on VA: Def’s refusal to submit to a SW for DNA could be argued as consciousness of guilt at trial

AZ: Protective sweep that produced a bullet casing was unjustified (but harmless)

Defendant has standing to challenge the search of a mobile home he had rented even though he had not fully moved in, and the trial court erred in concluding otherwise. The state’s argument the entry into the mobile home required … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Protective sweep | Comments Off on AZ: Protective sweep that produced a bullet casing was unjustified (but harmless)

E.D.Mich.: Def’s furtive movement justified extending the stop

Defendant’s reaching out of sight during a traffic stop was a furtive movement justifying extending the stop and seeing what he was doing. United States v. Edwards, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 185987 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 28, 2019).* The protective sweep … Continue reading →

Posted in Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Def’s furtive movement justified extending the stop