NY3: Working meth lab provided exigency for warrantless entry

Officers went to defendant’s house to do a knock-and-talk based on a tip he had a working meth lab. When they knocked, he ran out the back door. The officer positioned there shouted for him to stop and drop what he was carrying. He dropped it but ran back inside. The back door was open 22-24″. The officers had exigency to enter because of the likelihood of the working meth lab. People v. Richards, 2019 NY Slip Op 07810, 2019 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7830 (3d Dept. Oct. 31, 2019). [We haven’t seen one of these in a while.]

“In this case of first impression, we consider whether either the common law or the First Amendment confers a qualified right of access to the press and the public to inspect certain search warrant materials issued in connection with a grand jury investigation. We conclude no such right exists where, as here, the request is made while the grand jury’s investigation is ongoing. Accordingly, we affirm.” (Once the grand jury is over, this can be revisited.) In re 2014 Allegheny Cty. Investigating Grand Jury, 2019 Pa. LEXIS 6121 (Oct. 31, 2019), prior appeal, In re 2014 Allegheny Cty. Investigating Grand Jury, 643 Pa. 277, 173 A.3d 653 (2017).

This entry was posted in Emergency / exigency. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.