Author Archives: Hall

WaPo: Ex-FBI lawyer, accused of falsifying document in probe of Trump’s campaign, to plead guilty

WaPo: Ex-FBI lawyer, accused of falsifying document in probe of Trump’s campaign, to plead guilty by Matt Zapotosky and Devlin Barrett:

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on WaPo: Ex-FBI lawyer, accused of falsifying document in probe of Trump’s campaign, to plead guilty

E.D.Cal.: SI for a bicycle riding infraction is unjustified

Defendant was lawfully stopped for riding his bicycle on the sidewalk over a bridge, but it was only an infraction and a search incident was unreasonable. United States v. Harris, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 145000 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 12, 2020). … Continue reading →

Posted in Search incident, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: SI for a bicycle riding infraction is unjustified

CA6: Alleged false statement to get an arrest warrant overcame QI

Alleged false statement to get an arrest warrant overcame qualified immunity. Tlapanco v. Elges, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 25595 (6th Cir. Aug. 12, 2020). The state failed to show exigent circumstances excused obtaining a search warrant for defendant’s BAC. Commonwealth … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA6: Alleged false statement to get an arrest warrant overcame QI

GA: A search waiver as a condition of a bail bond is valid

A search waiver as a condition of a bail bond is valid in Georgia. Watson v. State, 2020 Ga. App. LEXIS 446 (Aug. 12, 2020):

Posted in Consent, Reasonableness | Comments Off on GA: A search waiver as a condition of a bail bond is valid

CA3: FBI notice of being “armed and dangerous” justified stop and furtive movement a frisk

“Here, McKee testified that the FBI notice describing Robinson stated that he was armed and dangerous. McKee also testified that Robinson failed to comply with his first order to put his hands up and kept reaching for his waistband. These … Continue reading →

Posted in Nexus, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA3: FBI notice of being “armed and dangerous” justified stop and furtive movement a frisk

FL3: Some discretion in the seizing officers as to what should be seized was not unreasonable or a lack of particularity

Some discretion in the seizing officers as to what should be seized was not unreasonable or a lack of particularity. An unfilled-in blank on the warrant didn’t make it vague, either. Also, defendant waived his probable cause argument on appeal … Continue reading →

Posted in Particularity, Waiver | Comments Off on FL3: Some discretion in the seizing officers as to what should be seized was not unreasonable or a lack of particularity

OH5: 911 call of man carrying long gun on street wasn’t RS

Police received a 911 call that a man was carrying an “AK”-like long gun, hiding from passersby, and was apparently going to rob a store. Defendant was encountered openly carrying a gun, legal conduct, but he wasn’t hiding because the … Continue reading →

Posted in Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH5: 911 call of man carrying long gun on street wasn’t RS

CA11: SI of notebook in def’s purse was reasonable without PC as to it

A notebook in defendant’s purse was properly searched incident to her arrest, even without probable cause it contained evidence. United States v. Ouedraogo, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 25519 (11th Cir. Aug. 12, 2020):

Posted in Search incident | Comments Off on CA11: SI of notebook in def’s purse was reasonable without PC as to it

NJ: Once SW issues for cell phone, foregone conclusion exception to self-incrimination applies and password can be compelled

Once a search warrant issues for a cell phone, there is no privilege of self-incrimination in the phone barring compelled production of the password. The foregone conclusion exception to the Fifth Amendment applies. State v. Andrews, A-72-18 (N.J. Aug. 10, … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Privileges | Comments Off on NJ: Once SW issues for cell phone, foregone conclusion exception to self-incrimination applies and password can be compelled

CA7: Prison inmates have 4A reasonableness protection against abusive strip and body cavity searches

Prison inmates retain a Fourth Amendment reasonableness right against abusive strip and body cavity searches enough to state a claim here. Qualified immunity is reserved for later. Henry v. Hulett, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 25390 (7th Cir. Aug. 11, 2020) … Continue reading →

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA7: Prison inmates have 4A reasonableness protection against abusive strip and body cavity searches

CA11: Def’s failure to claim cell phone once it was released was abandonment

Police released defendant’s cell phone two days after its seizure, but defendant never sought to recover it. This was considered an abandonment. Standing to challenge CSLI could be an issue because the phones weren’t claimed, but, without deciding that, the … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on CA11: Def’s failure to claim cell phone once it was released was abandonment

N.D.Ill.: Reasonable reliance on apparent authority is good faith in itself

Reasonable reliance on apparent authority to consent is good faith. “And relying on consent in good faith is circular and redundant. Whether there is apparent authority to consent already addresses the officers’ good-faith belief in the consenters’ authority. Put differently, … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority, Probable cause | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: Reasonable reliance on apparent authority is good faith in itself

CA11: While unclear whether 4A applies to pretrial detainees, 14A does and standards the same

As pretrial detainee, it’s unclear whether the Fourth Amendment applies to his claims. The Fourteenth Amendment clearly does, and, in any event the standards would be applied the same. Patel v. Lanier County, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 25345 (11th Cir. … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on CA11: While unclear whether 4A applies to pretrial detainees, 14A does and standards the same

AZ: Offer of proof would be helpful for Franks claim, and def didn’t make one here

“As noted above, however, some of these alleged omissions and misstatements are simply not supported by the record. And, the omissions that are supported by the record were not material given the strength of the evidence supporting a finding of … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Exclusionary rule, Franks doctrine, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on AZ: Offer of proof would be helpful for Franks claim, and def didn’t make one here

D.Nev.: Ptf’s claim he was held past his sentence expiring stated a 4A claim

Plaintiff’s claim he was held in jail past his sentence expiration date survives summary judgment as a Fourth Amendment claim. Barrese v. Las Vegas Metro. Police Dep’t, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 143360 (D. Nev. Aug. 10, 2020). The trial court … Continue reading →

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Ptf’s claim he was held past his sentence expiring stated a 4A claim

N.D.Cal.: “chemical agents, less lethal projectiles such as rubber bullets and flashbang grenades” against peaceful protesters states enough to stay in court

Plaintiffs were alleged peaceful protesters in Oakland claiming excessive force was used against them: “chemical agents, less lethal projectiles such as rubber bullets and flashbang grenades.” They provided video evidence. They stated enough of a claim at this point to … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: “chemical agents, less lethal projectiles such as rubber bullets and flashbang grenades” against peaceful protesters states enough to stay in court

D.Me.: No exigent circumstances for BAC blood sample without SW

A Park Ranger in Acadia National Park in Maine followed Maine law to get a blood sample without a search warrant. There were no exigent circumstances, and the blood sample is suppressed. United States v. Manubolu, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on D.Me.: No exigent circumstances for BAC blood sample without SW

NY3: Stop justified by traffic offense, despite racial pretext claim

Defendant’s stop was justified by a traffic offense, despite claims it might have been racially motivated. People v. Price, 2020 NY Slip Op 04430, 2020 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4532 (3d Dept. Aug. 6, 2020). See the concurring opinion:

Posted in Pretext | Comments Off on NY3: Stop justified by traffic offense, despite racial pretext claim

CA7: “Extensive police corroboration” of CI’s story was PC

Defendant’s appellate argument the CI’s information wasn’t probable cause is rejected. “[T]he extensive police corroboration detailed in the affidavit strongly supports the issuing judge’s probable cause determination. … [¶] Next, on the second and third factors, Bonz had firsthand knowledge … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA7: “Extensive police corroboration” of CI’s story was PC

CA9: It was well established that “illegal presence” in the U.S. was not a crime, so ptf’s arrest was unreasonable

Illegal entry is a crime, but not mere presence, and that was well established since 2012. Defendant’s arrest of plaintiff in a courtroom as a witness on suspicion of being here illegally at the request of a JP was unreasonable. … Continue reading →

Posted in Immigration arrests, Qualified immunity, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA9: It was well established that “illegal presence” in the U.S. was not a crime, so ptf’s arrest was unreasonable