Author Archives: Hall

CA11: Successor habeas over detention that led to confession not based on newly discovered evidence

Petitioner’s 2254 successor petition is denied on his claim that his detention was unreasonable that led to his confession. “Nero’s claims do not meet the statutory criteria. He indicates that his claims do not rely on a new rule of … Continue reading →

Posted in Issue preclusion, Unreasonable application / § 2254(d) | Comments Off on CA11: Successor habeas over detention that led to confession not based on newly discovered evidence

D.VI.: CBP questions at border like “Did you pack the bag yourself” not subject to Miranda

Questions at Customs “Is this your bag?”; “Did you pack the bag yourself?”; and “Are you carrying anything for anyone?” are not subject to Miranda. They related to admissibility of the traveler. United States v. Bailey, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Border search | Comments Off on D.VI.: CBP questions at border like “Did you pack the bag yourself” not subject to Miranda

W.D.Wash.: Demand for records from federal govt didn’t state a Washington state law claim

A demand for records from the federal government doesn’t state a claim under Washington state law when plaintiff grudgingly gave up the records. Daviscourt v. United States, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 246610 (W.D. Wash. Dec. 10, 2020)*:

Posted in State constitution, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on W.D.Wash.: Demand for records from federal govt didn’t state a Washington state law claim

Geofence warrants can be used to identify those who invaded the Capitol, not to mention Facebook warrants

The government’s prior use of geofence warrants were a prelude to this: With the invasion of the Capitol on Wednesday, the government now can attempt to locate all the cell phones inside the Capitol to identify those to potentially charge. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Cell site location information, Digital privacy, Digital Searches, geofence, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Geofence warrants can be used to identify those who invaded the Capitol, not to mention Facebook warrants

W.D.Wash.: Demand for records complied with doesn’t state a state law claim for invasion of privacy

A demand for records from the federal government doesn’t state a claim under Washington state law when plaintiff grudgingly gave up the records. Daviscourt v. United States, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 246610 (W.D. Wash. Dec. 10, 2020)*:

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on W.D.Wash.: Demand for records complied with doesn’t state a state law claim for invasion of privacy

D.Minn.: When nexus of drugs to a residence is established, it can move with the def

If defendant moves and nexus to his residence and drugs has been established, it is a reasonable inference that the drugs went with the move. United States v. Hudson, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 246482 (D. Minn. Dec.19, 2020). “On the … Continue reading →

Posted in Nexus, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Minn.: When nexus of drugs to a residence is established, it can move with the def

OR: With recreational marijuana, the smell alone isn’t RS or PC

Because possession of recreational marijuana is legal in Oregon, the smell alone is not reasonable suspicion. Here, however, there was reasonable suspicion based on additional facts of attempted concealment. State v. T.T. (In re T.T.), 308 Ore. App. 408 (Jan. … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OR: With recreational marijuana, the smell alone isn’t RS or PC

CA5: Standard of review: GFE first, basis for finding PC second

“This court engages in a two-step inquiry when reviewing a district court’s denial of a defendant’s motion to suppress which challenges the sufficiency of a warrant. … First, this court determines whether the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule announced … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Standards of review | Comments Off on CA5: Standard of review: GFE first, basis for finding PC second

CA5: Independent RS obviated govt’s reliance on collective knowledge

“First, we need not address the collective-knowledge doctrine. The police officer who initiated the traffic stop developed reasonable suspicion of a straw purchase through his own questioning and discovery of the firearm in Perez’s trunk after Perez lied about having … Continue reading →

Posted in Collective knowledge, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA5: Independent RS obviated govt’s reliance on collective knowledge

CO: Forced blood test unreasonable and suppressed; remedy is to prosecute for refusal

Under Colorado statute, anyone who drives a motor vehicle in the state is deemed to have consented to take a blood or breath test when requested by a law enforcement officer having probable cause to believe the driver is under … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on CO: Forced blood test unreasonable and suppressed; remedy is to prosecute for refusal

CA11: Not IAC to not challenge recording jail calls

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not challenging recording jail calls [actually stated as a 2254(d) failure]. Garcia v. Sec’y, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 314 (11th Cir. Jan. 6, 2021).* The CSLI warrant was particular and not a general warrant, and … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Informant hearsay, Particularity, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on CA11: Not IAC to not challenge recording jail calls

N.D.Ind.: Ptf’s 4A claim wasn’t sufficiently articulated to state a claim

“Mr. Ryan also alleges that there wasn’t any ‘adversarial pursuit of the Fourth Amendment’s protection of privacy can not be invalidated simply because a person’s right to want to be private evidences unlawful activity because the person does not want … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Burden of pleading, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: Ptf’s 4A claim wasn’t sufficiently articulated to state a claim

S.D.N.Y.: Littering from a livery cab justified stop and search of the cab

A littering offense from a livery cab in NYC justified a stop of the cab and entering it for further evidence of the crime. That resulted in a plain view. United States v. Abreu, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1945 (S.D. … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Littering from a livery cab justified stop and search of the cab

DE: Def can’t argue RS was standard below then PC was required on appeal

Defendant can’t argue below that reasonable suspicion was all that was required, but then argue on appeal that probable cause was required. Gordon v. State, 2021 Del. LEXIS 2 (Jan. 6, 2021). An eyewitness claiming to be assaulted by defendant … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Standards of review | Comments Off on DE: Def can’t argue RS was standard below then PC was required on appeal

FL2 sua sponte raises lack of standing on the record and remands

“The State appeals the trial court’s order granting Ricardo Fernandez’s motion to suppress after the trial court found the affidavit used to obtain the anticipatory search warrant was deficient and the good faith exception to the warrant requirement did not … Continue reading →

Posted in Standards of review, Standing | Comments Off on FL2 sua sponte raises lack of standing on the record and remands

M.D.Fla.: Even if a notebook was unlawfully seized, an IRS summons for it was valid

The IRS summons was upheld. “[E]ven if the notebooks were unlawfully seized, the Fourth Amendment’s exclusionary rule does not render the summonses unenforceable. First, even if the exclusionary rule applied, evidence may not be excluded when it is obtained based … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Reasonable suspicion, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Even if a notebook was unlawfully seized, an IRS summons for it was valid

CA5: Affidavit for SW for cell phone photos didn’t show PC for drug trafficking

The affidavit for the search warrant for defendant’s cell phone for evidence of drug trafficking and not just personal use did not permit a search of the photographs on the phone for evidence of drug trafficking. The good faith exception … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA5: Affidavit for SW for cell phone photos didn’t show PC for drug trafficking

N.D.Ind.: Franks challenge in PC clothing fails for no offer of proof

“At first glance, the Defendant’s motion does not appear to be a true Franks hearing request as it does not appear to contest the veracity of the statements of the affiant or assert that she made false allegations. Rather, it … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: Franks challenge in PC clothing fails for no offer of proof

CA5: Ptf’s underlying conviction is attacked by his 4A claim and thus barred by Heck

“We begin with Price’s Fourth Amendment excessive force claims as alleged in his proposed amended complaint. The district court concluded that Price’s claims, even as amended, remained ‘inseparable’ from his conviction for battery of an officer and, thus, were barred … Continue reading →

Posted in Issue preclusion | Comments Off on CA5: Ptf’s underlying conviction is attacked by his 4A claim and thus barred by Heck

W.D.Pa.: CI’s story was substantially corroborated to provide PC; controlled buys the clincher

The CI’s story was substantially corroborated to provide probable cause. “In this case, Frampton’s affidavit provides substantial information about the CI’s reliability, from which the issuing judge could have inferred probable cause. The affidavit recounted the reliability of the CI’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: CI’s story was substantially corroborated to provide PC; controlled buys the clincher