Author Archives: Hall

DC: Tacit approval for private search made it state action

Defendant was arrested in a rental car, and he claimed ownership of the bags in the trunk. The police gave tacit approval to the towing company employee’s search of the bags, thus making him an agent for the search. Fogg … Continue reading →

Posted in Abstention, Private search | Comments Off on DC: Tacit approval for private search made it state action

D.Minn.: Pleading warrant process “irregularities” without showing anything prejudicial insufficient

Defendant’s perceived “irregularities” with the warrants raising “troubling and unanswered questions concerning the integrity of the warrant process” essentially invites the court to speculate where he doesn’t. The court won’t do that. United States v. Jones, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Warrant requirement | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Pleading warrant process “irregularities” without showing anything prejudicial insufficient

IL: Def’s failure to answer request for consent is not implied consent

When asked for consent, defendant didn’t answer. The officer’s testimony that “he not tell me no” was not consent, which had to proved by the state. People v. Banta, 2021 IL App (4th) 180761, 2021 Ill. App. LEXIS 112 (Mar. … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Hot pursuit, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on IL: Def’s failure to answer request for consent is not implied consent

CA3: Nexus shown to def’s home for SW for clothing worn in robbery

When the object of a search is clothing worn during a robbery, there is nexus to defendant’s home. United States v. Ross, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 7701 (3d Cir. Mar. 17, 2021). Defendant answered the officer’s knock on the door … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Attenuation, Nexus | Comments Off on CA3: Nexus shown to def’s home for SW for clothing worn in robbery

W.D.Mo.: Affiant in fraud case wasn’t required to cite CFRs on background for the defense

Defendant in a fraud offense pled that federal regulators should have been cited in the affidavit for search warrant so the issuing magistrate will appreciate that this might not be a fraud. That’s not the point of a search warrant. … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Affiant in fraud case wasn’t required to cite CFRs on background for the defense

VICE: Cars Have Your Location. This Spy Firm Wants to Sell It to the U.S. Military

VICE: Cars Have Your Location. This Spy Firm Wants to Sell It to the U.S. Military by Joseph Cox (“15 billion car locations. Nearly any country on Earth. ‘The Ulysses Group’ is pitching a powerful surveillance technology to the U.S. … Continue reading →

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Surveillance technology, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on VICE: Cars Have Your Location. This Spy Firm Wants to Sell It to the U.S. Military

S.D.N.Y.: Franks applies to court orders to remove children from home

In a child in need of services case, a well pled Franks violation can state a claim, but this one wasn’t. Grullon v. Administrator for Children’s Services, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49614 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 16, 2021) (recognizing rule; citing Estiverne … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Franks applies to court orders to remove children from home

W.D.N.Y.: Failure to specify the crime under investigation in a Facebook SW wasn’t fatal to search

Failure to specify the crime under investigation in a Facebook warrant wasn’t fatal and did not require exclusion. United States v. Vogelbacher, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49359 (W.D.N.Y. Feb. 1, 2021), adopted 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48228 (W.D.N.Y. Mar. 15, … Continue reading →

Posted in Particularity, Social media warrants | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: Failure to specify the crime under investigation in a Facebook SW wasn’t fatal to search

E.D.Mich.: Govt’s violation of 42 C.F.R. Part 2 has no exclusionary remedy; that’s for const’l violations

In an opiod over prescribing case, a government violation of 42 C.F.R. Part 2 by the government only leads to a fine against the offending person. The exclusionary rule does not apply to regulation violations. United States v. Pompy, 2021 … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Govt’s violation of 42 C.F.R. Part 2 has no exclusionary remedy; that’s for const’l violations

CA5: RS for immigration stop was based on location and officer’s experience

“The Government argues, and we agree, that the totality of the circumstances here support a finding that Agent Stauffiger had reasonable suspicion to justify stopping Nelson’s vehicle. First, our Court has recognized that proximity to the border is ‘a paramount … Continue reading →

Posted in Immigration arrests, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA5: RS for immigration stop was based on location and officer’s experience

CA5: Anonymous tip wasn’t sufficiently corroborated

The anonymous tip here wasn’t sufficiently corroborated to make reasonable suspicion. The evidence supports the district court’s conclusion. United States v. Norbert, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 7620 (5th Cir. Mar. 16, 2021) (2-1):

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA5: Anonymous tip wasn’t sufficiently corroborated

W.D.La.: Motion to suppress SW has to plead and proffer that GFE doesn’t apply

Defendant had a duty to address the good faith exception in his motion and amended motion to suppress a search under a warrant, but he did not. United States v. Lyons, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48780 (W.D. La. Feb. 17, … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Dog sniff, Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on W.D.La.: Motion to suppress SW has to plead and proffer that GFE doesn’t apply

NC: DUI checkpoint had programmatic purpose

The state proved a valid programmatic purpose for its driver’s license and DUI checkpoint. State v. Macke, 2021-NCCOA-70, 2021 N.C. App. LEXIS 61 (Mar. 16, 2021). Defense counsel was not ineffective for not challenging defendant’s stop because there was reasonable … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Particularity, Roadblocks | Comments Off on NC: DUI checkpoint had programmatic purpose

E.D.Ark.: Stopping highspeed chase with motorcycle by causing accident not unreasonable under Scott

An officer’s pulling in front of a motorcycle eluding police at 105 mph was not a Fourth Amendment violation. “Accordingly, even if Duvall pulled his car over in a manner likely to cause the collision and serious injury or death, … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on E.D.Ark.: Stopping highspeed chase with motorcycle by causing accident not unreasonable under Scott

Two on alleged overbreadth

The Facebook warrant was kind of overbroad but was determined valid as a whole. “So as in Purcell, ‘the structure of the warrant rendered the specification of the suspected offense, while constitutionally indispensable, functionally unnecessary.’ Purcell, 967 F.3d at 183.” … Continue reading →

Posted in Overbreadth, Particularity | Comments Off on Two on alleged overbreadth

NY, Westchester Co.: NY’s Red Flag law doesn’t violate 2A, 4A, 5A, 6A, or 14A

As to the Fourth: “This Court finds that the search conducted herein pursuant to the ERPO statute was reasonable. Contrary to respondent’s assertion, the petitioner provided a sworn statement as to the basis for his belief that respondent was recently … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on NY, Westchester Co.: NY’s Red Flag law doesn’t violate 2A, 4A, 5A, 6A, or 14A

N.D.Ohio: 911 call about attempted carjacking led to RS

“Under these circumstances, I find the 911 call contained sufficient indicia of reliability to support Carpenter’s belief in the facts alleged by the caller. Thus, Carpenter was justified in believing there was a man named Dominic, who owned a gun, … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: 911 call about attempted carjacking led to RS

CA10: A drug dog “alert, as opposed to a final indication, is sufficient to establish probable cause.”

The district court credited the dog handler that the dog alerted. “To the extent that Goldberg brings a legal challenge, this court has held that an alert, as opposed to a final indication, is sufficient to establish probable cause.” United … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Immigration checkpoints, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA10: A drug dog “alert, as opposed to a final indication, is sufficient to establish probable cause.”

CA9: Changing argument from disputing facts of PC to facts don’t show PC is waiver

“Bruno changed his argument on appeal. In the district court, he disputed the government’s factual representations supporting the search of his apartment. On appeal, he no longer argues that the search warrant application contained factual inaccuracies or material omissions. Rather, … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Consent, Waiver | Comments Off on CA9: Changing argument from disputing facts of PC to facts don’t show PC is waiver

CT: Defense counsel not ineffective for not calling def as witness at suppression hearing

Defense counsel was not ineffective for not calling defendant to testify at the suppression hearing to avoid potential further admissions of guilt [What about Simmons v. United States and its “immunity”?], and defense counsel was confident standing was shown. Moreover, … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Standing | Comments Off on CT: Defense counsel not ineffective for not calling def as witness at suppression hearing