Author Archives: Hall

SCOTUS: Lange v. California: “Under the Fourth Amendment, pursuit of a fleeing misdemeanor suspect does not always—that is, categorically—justify a warrantless entry into a home.”

Lange v. California, 141 S.Ct. 2011 (June 23, 2021). Syllabus:

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Emergency / exigency, SCOTUS | Comments Off on SCOTUS: Lange v. California: “Under the Fourth Amendment, pursuit of a fleeing misdemeanor suspect does not always—that is, categorically—justify a warrantless entry into a home.”

S.D.Ill.: Claim of smell of marijuana from edibles in sealed container not credible

Court finds the officers lacked credibility on the claim they could smell marijuana from fruit flavored edibles in sealed packages. United States v. Clark, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 115872 (S.D. Ill. June 22, 2021):

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on S.D.Ill.: Claim of smell of marijuana from edibles in sealed container not credible

CA6: Successor habeas trying to make search claim a Brady issue fails

Successor habeas on ground that audio of dashcam video was muted to conceal a Fourth Amendment violation denied. It doesn’t show actual innocence for 2255(h). In re Jelks, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 18552 (6th Cir. June 21, 2021). Defendant had … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on CA6: Successor habeas trying to make search claim a Brady issue fails

CA2: DL address is “reason to believe” where def lives for entry on arrest warrant

Defendant’s DL had the address where the police entered on an arrest warrant, and it led to a plain view. The DL address was “reason to believe” it was his address. United States v. Johnson, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 18491 … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CA2: DL address is “reason to believe” where def lives for entry on arrest warrant

D.Ore.: 3 min. wait for backup here did not unreasonably extend traffic stop

Three minute wait for backup officer to arrive did not unreasonably extend the stop based on the articulated justification: “Officer Carney called and waited for a cover officer so that he could safely carry out the mission of the traffic … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Ore.: 3 min. wait for backup here did not unreasonably extend traffic stop

Techdirt: DOJ Asks DC Court To Compel Decryption Of Device Seized In A Capitol Raid Case

Techdirt: DOJ Asks DC Court To Compel Decryption Of Device Seized In A Capitol Raid Case by Tim Cushing. The government filed this pleading.

Posted in Cell phones, Privileges | Comments Off on Techdirt: DOJ Asks DC Court To Compel Decryption Of Device Seized In A Capitol Raid Case

E.D.Ark.: No 4A REP in trash container at the street for pickup

Based on the undisputed facts (such that a hearing isn’t required), defendant’s trash was out for collection, and no reasonable expectation of privacy was violated by searching it, and then using that information to get a search warrant. “Here, Officer … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonableness | Comments Off on E.D.Ark.: No 4A REP in trash container at the street for pickup

W.D.N.Y.: One has to show standing to get access to SW materials

Defendant has to show his standing to get access to the search warrant application under United States v. Pirk, 282 F. Supp. 3d 585, 594 (W.D.N.Y. 2017). United States v. Cobb, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 114405 (W.D. N.Y. June 18, … Continue reading →

Posted in Mail and packages, Probable cause, Standing, Warrant execution | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: One has to show standing to get access to SW materials

D.Kan.: Seizure without RS led to abandonment; suppression granted

Defendant was seized without reasonable suspicion when an officer acting on an informant’s tip approached him with hand on gun telling defendant to raise his hands. Seconds later, he fled, dropping the gun. The court finds an unreasonable seizure precipitated … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Exclusionary rule, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Seizure without RS led to abandonment; suppression granted

IA: State constitution prohibits warrantless trash search; “Current Fourth Amendment jurisprudence is a mess.”

Finding Iowa law long recognized trespass was an unreasonable entry, the state Supreme Court holds under the state constitution that trash out for collection by the trash collector is not abandoned property, and defendant still retained a reasonable expectation of … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, GPS / Tracking Data, Reasonable expectation of privacy, State constitution | Comments Off on IA: State constitution prohibits warrantless trash search; “Current Fourth Amendment jurisprudence is a mess.”

MI: Def’s arrest being unlawful, his statement during should be suppressed

The state supreme court having found defendant’s arrest unlawful, his statement during the arrest should have been suppressed. People v. Hammerlund, 2021 Mich. App. LEXIS 3773 (June 17, 2021) (2-1) (dissent). Detention under the Material Witness Statute that was validly … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Probable cause, Reasonableness | Comments Off on MI: Def’s arrest being unlawful, his statement during should be suppressed

OK: Smell of burnt marijuana in car is still PC in MMJ state

The smell of burnt marijuana in defendant’s car was still probable cause, despite it being in a medical marijuana state. State v. Roberson, 2021 OK CR 16, 2021 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 16 (June 17, 2021):

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on OK: Smell of burnt marijuana in car is still PC in MMJ state

FL2: State’s failure to prove policy for inventory was failure of proof on warrantless search

Inventory is an exception to the warrant requirement, so the state carries the burden of proof. Here, the state failed to prove the policy, a General Order, that permitted the inventory to show that it was not a subterfuge for … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Inventory | Comments Off on FL2: State’s failure to prove policy for inventory was failure of proof on warrantless search

WI: Warrantless blood draw from incapacitated driver unconstitutional

Wisconsin’s statute allegedly permitting blood draws of incapacitated drivers is unconstitutional for lack of actual consent, but the good faith exception saves it today. State v. Prado, 2021 WI 64, 2021 Wisc. LEXIS 98 (June 18, 2021):

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Good faith exception | Comments Off on WI: Warrantless blood draw from incapacitated driver unconstitutional

FL5: Police report’s stating search was search incident isn’t binding at the suppression hearing

The officer’s noting the search of defendant’s vehicle was incident to arrest was incorrect and not binding at the suppression hearing. It was valid as an inventory. State v. Koontz, 2021 Fla. App. LEXIS 9019 (Fla. 5th DCA June 18, … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Inventory, Search incident, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on FL5: Police report’s stating search was search incident isn’t binding at the suppression hearing

D.N.M.: Def’s failing to stop for a Terry stop doesn’t justify hot pursuit into home

Officers cannot enter a defendant’s home in hot pursuit from his failing to stop for a Terry stop on mere reasonable suspicion. United States v. Cannon, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 112705 (D.N.M. June 16, 2021). The officer’s initial observations of … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Hot pursuit, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Def’s failing to stop for a Terry stop doesn’t justify hot pursuit into home

OH10: Not challenging SW was strategic choice in self-defense case

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not objecting to the search warrant because it would contradict his claim of self-defense. State v. Messenger, 2021-Ohio-2044, 2021 Ohio App. LEXIS 2017 (10th Dist. June 17, 2021) (see § 60.19) The issue here is … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Burden of proof, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on OH10: Not challenging SW was strategic choice in self-defense case

D.Mass.: Four month delay in getting SW for cell phone was not unreasonable

There was justification for seizure of defendant’s cell phone in plain view because it might have evidence of a crime on it. The four month delay in obtaining a search warrant for the phone was reasonable under all the circumstances, … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Reasonableness | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Four month delay in getting SW for cell phone was not unreasonable

Mapp v. Ohio decided 60 years ago today

Mapp v. Ohio was decided 60 years ago today. See these prior posts; 2017 and 2014

Posted in SCOTUS | Comments Off on Mapp v. Ohio decided 60 years ago today

IA: Def’s registration papers weren’t in order; while waiting on a response from dispatch, criminal history led to calling drug dog. This didn’t extend the stop

The officer intended only to give a warning, but it took a while for defendant’s registration to clear a computer check. While waiting, the officer checked defendant’s criminal history finding a significant meth history and then called for a drug … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on IA: Def’s registration papers weren’t in order; while waiting on a response from dispatch, criminal history led to calling drug dog. This didn’t extend the stop