Author Archives: Hall

N.D.Okla.: Cross designated tribal officer could obtain state SW then used in federal court

A Cherokee Nation officer was cross-deputized to act for the “City of Tulsa, the State of Oklahoma, the United States, and the Cherokee Nation.” “Second, the Supreme Court has found that reviewing courts should give ‘great deference’ to a magistrate’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Reasonableness | Comments Off on N.D.Okla.: Cross designated tribal officer could obtain state SW then used in federal court

N.D.Cal.: PC in the affidavit was lacking, even with its detail; no GFE either

The affidavit for the search warrant for defendant’s place lacked probable cause. “As the affidavit did not establish probable cause as to forgery or possession of stolen property, and the government conceded there was not probable cause to support the … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: PC in the affidavit was lacking, even with its detail; no GFE either

CA7: Merely knocking on the door to def’s motel room and him answering isn’t a seizure

Merely knocking on the door to defendant’s motel room and him answering isn’t a seizure. Moreover, showing him an arrest warrant for 15-20 seconds was not a seizure (but he didn’t even adequately brief it). He then consented to entry … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Seizure | Comments Off on CA7: Merely knocking on the door to def’s motel room and him answering isn’t a seizure

CA6: Arguable PC defeats false arrest claim

Plaintiff is a police officer who was apparently drunk in the Detroit airport after returning to Michigan with his children for Thanksgiving weekend. He ended up being arrested and sued. He understood he was impaired and was going to have … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA6: Arguable PC defeats false arrest claim

CA8: Even if airport search was unreasonable, affidavit for SW had independent PC

Defendant passed through the Little Rock airport TSA checkpoint, and an “organic mass” was seen in the x-ray and that resulted in opening his luggage finding $112,000. That led to the police being called over, too. Further investigation resulted in … Continue reading →

Posted in Airport searches | Comments Off on CA8: Even if airport search was unreasonable, affidavit for SW had independent PC

MA: Late disclosure of product of search wasn’t exculpatory so no prejudice

Defendant sought in discovery the call log from the search of his cell phone. The state didn’t provide it timely. It was not exculpatory in trial counsel’s view because it contradicted the defense witnesses and whatever defense they had for … Continue reading →

Posted in Motion to suppress, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MA: Late disclosure of product of search wasn’t exculpatory so no prejudice

NY1: Where seized evidence wasn’t used at trial, it’s moot

Defendant’s Fourth Amendment argument on appeal is moot. The evidence he complains was wrongly seized wasn’t used at trial. People v. Gordon, 2022 NY Slip Op 00055, 2022 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 63 (1st Dept. Jan. 6, 2022). The omitted … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Mootness, Probable cause | Comments Off on NY1: Where seized evidence wasn’t used at trial, it’s moot

CA9: It is clearly established that using “intermediate force” against a nonresisting arrestee is unreasonable

It was clearly established that using “intermediate force” against a nonresisting arrestee is unreasonable. “To be clear, we are generally loath to second-guess law enforcement officers’ actions in a dangerous situation by analyzing each act without looking at the entire … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: It is clearly established that using “intermediate force” against a nonresisting arrestee is unreasonable

CA8: “Delay in searching a phone is immaterial to the reasonableness of a seizure, however, when the device has independent evidentiary value.”

Defendant went through airport security in Long Beach with a gun in a bag. A further stop and search of him found seven cell phones. They were ultimately searched with a warrant finding text messages detailing drug deals. The delay … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA8: “Delay in searching a phone is immaterial to the reasonableness of a seizure, however, when the device has independent evidentiary value.”

The Crime Report: ‘Search Warrants Rot Law Enforcement’: Paper

The Crime Report: ‘Search Warrants Rot Law Enforcement’: Paper by Andrea Cipriano:

Posted in Knock and announce | Comments Off on The Crime Report: ‘Search Warrants Rot Law Enforcement’: Paper

TX8: Purely private search of cell phone not suppressed under art. 38.23(a)

The purely private search of defendant’s cell phone finding child pornography that was reported to police was not subject to exclusion under Texas’s art. 38.23(a). If a laptop search is not subject to exclusion, neither is a cell phone. Horne … Continue reading →

Posted in Private search, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on TX8: Purely private search of cell phone not suppressed under art. 38.23(a)

MT: Lawyer suspended for telling client to refuse to cooperate in execution of a SW

A lawyer telling his girlfriend-client to refuse to cooperate in DUI blood draw by search warrant is suspended for 30 days. Multiple officers were ultimately involved with a restraint chair brought in before she relented. The lawyer was also convicted … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Ineffective assistance, Neutral and detached magistrate, Warrant execution | Comments Off on MT: Lawyer suspended for telling client to refuse to cooperate in execution of a SW

N.D.Ohio: Not IAC to not raise every suppression issue def wants

Defense counsel had the discretion not to make every argument defendant wanted on a suppression motion. “It is well within counsel’s constitutional discretion to make the decision to raise or not raise certain arguments at a suppression hearing. That counsel … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Not IAC to not raise every suppression issue def wants

D.Del.: The traffic stop question is only reasonableness, not whether state law was violated

One officer stopped defendant at the request of another. Defendant challenges its basis. “The question here is not whether the stop was authorized by [state law]. The question is rather whether the car stop was reasonable under the Fourth Amendment.” … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonableness | Comments Off on D.Del.: The traffic stop question is only reasonableness, not whether state law was violated

CA6: Torres v. Madrid not a new constitutional rule for successor habeas

Torres v. Madrid did not announce a new constitutional rule for an ineffective assistance of counsel claim in a successor habeas. In re Foster, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 141 (6th Cir. Jan. 3, 2022). “Considering that reasonable suspicion ‘is not, … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA6: Torres v. Madrid not a new constitutional rule for successor habeas

N.D.Ill.: Stopping work on the traffic ticket when the drug dog arrived resulted in lengthening the detention without RS

“Officer Allen admits that he was not printing the police department’s copy of the first citation or processing the second citation during the drug sniff. Rather, he completely stopped his traffic-related mission as soon as Officer Wiebe arrived and worked … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Issue preclusion, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: Stopping work on the traffic ticket when the drug dog arrived resulted in lengthening the detention without RS

E.D.Cal.: Garnishment of wages is not a 4A seizure

Garnishment of wages is not a Fourth Amendment seizure. Williams v. Drakaina Logistics, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 248750 (E.D.Cal. Dec. 30, 2021). Defendant’s property was seized on exigency after an apparent crime, and seizure was required to prevent destruction. United … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Plain view, feel, smell, Seizure | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: Garnishment of wages is not a 4A seizure

E.D.Mich.: Officers’ versions of arrest and search show two valid versions of why it was valid

The two officers involved in defendant’s stop and search of his person and car had somewhat different versions of what happened. Under either, the search of his person and car were both reasonable. Defendant had no DL which was an … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Informant hearsay, Search incident, Waiver | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Officers’ versions of arrest and search show two valid versions of why it was valid

GA: REP in apartment hallway outside door

Applying Dunn to defendant’s apartment hallway curtilage, defendant had a reasonable expectation of privacy at his apartment door. There was a locked gate to enter the area that the police somehow bypassed to get in for a dog sniff. State … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on GA: REP in apartment hallway outside door

TN: Where car was abandoned, there were no reasonable alternatives to impoundment available to the police

Tennessee recognizes that impoundment and inventory can be avoided if there are reasonable alternatives to it at the time. Here, defendant’s car was abandoned on the road and, when they arrived, it was in the process of being towed and … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on TN: Where car was abandoned, there were no reasonable alternatives to impoundment available to the police