Author Archives: Hall

D.S.C.: No exigency 6 hours after 911 call

Police showed up at defendant’s house six hours after a 911 call. Whatever exigency there might have been had dissipated. Everyone in the house was asleep. United States v. Miller, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 189981 (D.S.C. Oct. 17, 2022). The … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on D.S.C.: No exigency 6 hours after 911 call

W.D.N.C.: Facebook post of def with backpack full of cash a year earlier wasn’t stale

Reference in a search warrant application to a Facebook post showing defendant buying expensive jewelry with a backpack full of cash at a time when he claimed no taxable income since 2017 was not stale. United States v. Grandy, 2022 … Continue reading →

Posted in Staleness | Comments Off on W.D.N.C.: Facebook post of def with backpack full of cash a year earlier wasn’t stale

CA9: In excessive force case, those that did not shoot get QI; facts on those that did are in dispute

Officers who actually fired their weapons here do not get qualified immunity, but those who did not do. Peck v. Montoya, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 28822 (9th Cir. Oct. 18, 2022):

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force | Comments Off on CA9: In excessive force case, those that did not shoot get QI; facts on those that did are in dispute

NC: Not plain error for officer to read from SW affidavit at trial

The officer’s reading from the search warrant affidavit at trial because it contained hearsay may have been error, but it wasn’t plain error. Defendant was free to cross-examine on all of that to mitigate prejudice [if he could]. State v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Prison and jail searches, Probable cause | Comments Off on NC: Not plain error for officer to read from SW affidavit at trial

NC: Whether def was seized was what she could only believe

Defendant claimed she was lost and was stopped by police, blocking her exit. [Oversolicitously,] the court opines the officer probably thought he did nothing wrong but this was a seizure in defendant’s mind, and it was without reasonable suspicion. No … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on NC: Whether def was seized was what she could only believe

D.Mass.: Lawyer target of SW for records has no right to participate in the initial taint team review

A lawyer is the target of a search warrant. The government was using a taint team (or “filter team”) to review the materials for privileged matters. The lawyer proposed a more restrictive approach, and the government agreed with part of … Continue reading →

Posted in Privileges, Taint team | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Lawyer target of SW for records has no right to participate in the initial taint team review

M.D.Pa.: 14 yo kidnapping victim’s 911 call created exigency for def’s cell phone seizure

A 14-year-old kidnapping victim called 911 that she was taken three days earlier, and defendant was finally detained as a result. His phone was seized and a warrant obtained. The seizure of the warrant was reasonable based on all the … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Emergency / exigency, Probable cause, Seizure | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: 14 yo kidnapping victim’s 911 call created exigency for def’s cell phone seizure

CA7: Finality and administrative subpoenas v. administrative SWs

After enforcement of an administrative subpoena, there may be a final order. After an execution of an administrative warrant, however, there usually isn’t because there are processes left with the agency and in court. In re Establishment Inspection of Anthony … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search | Comments Off on CA7: Finality and administrative subpoenas v. administrative SWs

The Conversation: What is Fog Reveal? A legal scholar explains the app some police forces are using to track people without a warrant

The Conversation: What is Fog Reveal? A legal scholar explains the app some police forces are using to track people without a warrant by Anne Toomey McKenna (“Government use of Fog Reveal highlights a problematic difference between data privacy law … Continue reading →

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on The Conversation: What is Fog Reveal? A legal scholar explains the app some police forces are using to track people without a warrant

CA7: 4½ days to figure out ptf was innocent didn’t violate 4A or 14A

“Eli Martinez spent four and a half days in custody while he tried to explain to his jailers that his brother, Hector M. Rodriguez, was the one described in an arrest warrant. After Martinez was released, he sued two probation … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA7: 4½ days to figure out ptf was innocent didn’t violate 4A or 14A

Techdirt: Federal Judge Says FBI Misled Magistrate When Seeking Safe Deposit Warrants, OKs Searches Anyway

Techdirt: Federal Judge Says FBI Misled Magistrate When Seeking Safe Deposit Warrants, OKs Searches Anyway by Tim Cushing (“Unfortunately, the federal court handling this case doesn’t think the FBI’s lie matters, at least not in terms of determining probable cause. … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Good faith exception | Comments Off on Techdirt: Federal Judge Says FBI Misled Magistrate When Seeking Safe Deposit Warrants, OKs Searches Anyway

OH8: No PC for hot pursuit into house on less than RS

The state showed no probable cause to justify a warrantless entry into the home of a fleeing misdemeanant. Police got a citizen’s report of a possible impaired driver. When they found the car, it had just pulled into the driveway … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Emergency / exigency, Hot pursuit, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on OH8: No PC for hot pursuit into house on less than RS

D.N.M.: There is no exclusionary rule under Rule 41(g)

An action for return of property under Rule 41(g) is not a motion to suppress and does not invoke any exclusionary rule. Eastman v. United States, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 188438 (D.N.M. Oct. 14, 2022):

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on D.N.M.: There is no exclusionary rule under Rule 41(g)

E.D.Ky.: Def shows nothing to support claim taint team violated attorney-client privilege in review after SW

Defendant argued that the execution of this search warrant resulted in disclosure of attorney-client privileged information because of alleged misuse of a taint team. But, he provides no context or anything to go on. Taint teams are recognized in such … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion, Taint team, Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: Def shows nothing to support claim taint team violated attorney-client privilege in review after SW

OH8: Trial court’s order to permit def to inspect victim’s home which was scene of the crime violated 4A rights of victim

To prepare for trial, defendant sought an inspection of the victim’s home, the scene of the alleged crime of attempted murder. The trial court erred in the balancing the interests involved of the defendant’s right to a fair trial and … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonableness | Comments Off on OH8: Trial court’s order to permit def to inspect victim’s home which was scene of the crime violated 4A rights of victim

C.D.Cal.: SWAT team raid damage to house included in insurance coverage

Plaintiff’s claim against defendant insurance company for failing to pay an insurance claim for damage during a SWAT team raid on his house goes forward. The policy’s exclusionary clauses are overbroad under California law. Heard v. QBE Ins. Corp., 2022 … Continue reading →

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on C.D.Cal.: SWAT team raid damage to house included in insurance coverage

D.S.D.: Time waiting for someone to come to remove car, tow truck or friend, was part of incidents of stop

When the vehicle will be removed because of no licensed person to take control, the time between the calling of the tow truck or a friend or family member to take it away and their arrival is part of the … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Protective sweep, Staleness | Comments Off on D.S.D.: Time waiting for someone to come to remove car, tow truck or friend, was part of incidents of stop

OH: Exclusionary rule does not apply to statutory violations, here a parole search

Defendant signed a consent to parole search form, but the statute says it has to be on reasonable grounds. Here, even if the statute was violated, the exclusionary rule applies to constitutional violations, not statutory ones. State v. Campbell, 2022-Ohio-3626, … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on OH: Exclusionary rule does not apply to statutory violations, here a parole search

CA5: Standard of review for QI in excessive force cases

In this excessive force case, the Fifth Circuit discusses qualified immunity in the heat of a confrontation. Henderson v. Harris County, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 28436 (5th Cir. Oct. 12, 2022). The standard of review:

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA5: Standard of review for QI in excessive force cases

ProPublica/NBC News: Police Need Warrants to Search Homes. Child Welfare Agents Almost Never Get One.

ProPublica/NBC News: Police Need Warrants to Search Homes. Child Welfare Agents Almost Never Get One. by Eli Harper (“Each year, child protective services agencies inspect the homes of roughly 3.5 million children, opening refrigerators and closets without a warrant. Only … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search | Comments Off on ProPublica/NBC News: Police Need Warrants to Search Homes. Child Welfare Agents Almost Never Get One.