Author Archives: Hall

MD: Consent to search computer was withdrawn before search

Defendant signed a consent to search his computer hard drive to the US Army CID, but, once lawyered up, he effectively withdrew the consent a week later. The hard drive was searched after the withdrawal of consent, and the search … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Dog sniff, Drug or alcohol testing, Good faith exception, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on MD: Consent to search computer was withdrawn before search

E.D.Tenn.: There is no standing in CSLI of another’s phone

No standing to challenge acquiring the CSLI of another’s cell phone. United States v. Lopez, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 215709 (E.D. Tenn. Oct. 24, 2022),* adopted, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 214604 (E.D. Tenn. Nov. 29, 2022).* Defendant’s guilty plea waived … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: There is no standing in CSLI of another’s phone

CA6: Third-party standing in § 1983 fails

Plaintiff is the employer of people detained at a job site. Because their individual claims were small, the company sued for them. The third party standing claim under § 1983 fails, and the employer also admitted that the employees likely … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens | Comments Off on CA6: Third-party standing in § 1983 fails

Reason: Geofencing Warrants Are a Threat to Privacy

Reason: Geofencing Warrants Are a Threat to Privacy by Bonnie Kristian:

Posted in geofence | Comments Off on Reason: Geofencing Warrants Are a Threat to Privacy

WaPo: Police misused Find My app before raiding 77-year-old’s home, ACLU says

WaPo: Police misused Find My app before raiding 77-year-old’s home, ACLU says by María Luisa Paúl:

Posted in Good faith exception, Warrant execution | Comments Off on WaPo: Police misused Find My app before raiding 77-year-old’s home, ACLU says

SC: Exigency for CSLI was shooting victim left for dead and defendant was armed and dangerous

There was exigency for CSLI. “Thus, this was not a standard criminal investigation seeking cell phone data; rather, this request sought to address an ongoing emergency because Carter was potentially armed and dangerous, had been involved in a violent crime … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Burden of pleading, Cell site location information, Emergency / exigency, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on SC: Exigency for CSLI was shooting victim left for dead and defendant was armed and dangerous

CA3: Delaware “hit and hold” practice for entries not decided because of consent

The court declines to decide the officers’ “hit and hold” entries where they entered without a warrant but under alleged exigency, secured the premises, and then sought a search warrant. Because there was independent justification for the warrantless search after … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Arrest or entry on arrest, Emergency / exigency, Independent source, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on CA3: Delaware “hit and hold” practice for entries not decided because of consent

CA11: No jurisdiction to enjoin investigation after execution of SW

A District Court has no anomalous jurisdiction to bar the government from using evidence seized with a search warrant in an investigation. There are other remedies at the appropriate time. Trump v. United States. 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 33296 (11th … Continue reading →

Posted in Issue preclusion, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on CA11: No jurisdiction to enjoin investigation after execution of SW

The Epoch Times: Google Gave FBI Location Data for Over 5,000 Devices in Jan. 6 Probe

The Epoch Times: Google Gave FBI Location Data for Over 5,000 Devices in Jan. 6 Probe: Filing (“Mr. Rhine had a Fourth Amendment interest in his Location History data, and the warrant was overbroad and lacking particularity under the Fourth Amendment.”)

Posted in Computer and cloud searches | Comments Off on The Epoch Times: Google Gave FBI Location Data for Over 5,000 Devices in Jan. 6 Probe

S.D.Ind.: Forced Covid test didn’t violate 4A

Requiring plaintiff, who said he was positive for Covid-19, be tested before putting him in hospital was reasonable under the Fourth Amendment. It’s less intrusive than swabbing for DNA. Alternatively, qualified immunity applies. Mercado v. Columbus Reg’l Hosp., 2022 U.S. … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Probable cause, Qualified immunity, Seizure | Comments Off on S.D.Ind.: Forced Covid test didn’t violate 4A

CA4: Video showed district court’s findings of reasonableness clearly erroneous

The video of this stop contradicted the district court’s findings, and the motion to suppress should have been granted. “Here, however, the video evidence does not support some of Officer Helms’s statements and impressions. As we explain, the district court … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA4: Video showed district court’s findings of reasonableness clearly erroneous

CA3: Fire scene search for potential spread was exigent

The fire department arrived at a kitchen stove fire in an apartment building that was out. Informed of a sparking stove, fireman suspected there could be a fire in the basement. In the basement they found faulty wiring but no … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Emergency / exigency, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA3: Fire scene search for potential spread was exigent

MN: “Deer-in-the-headlights” look is a factor in RS

“But statements about a deer-in-the-headlights facial expression are commonplace in caselaw assessing whether a police officer has articulable, reasonable suspicion to justify a stop under the Fourth Amendment. There are over a dozen federal appellate decisions, including an opinion from … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on MN: “Deer-in-the-headlights” look is a factor in RS

D.Mass.: Park ranger’s arrest of def outside park wasn’t 4A violation, even if statute violated

“Ruiz argues that, because Carozzi lacked the statutory authority to arrest him outside the park, the arrest violated his Fourth Amendment rights, and therefore all evidence collected subsequent to his arrest (i.e., the breathalyzer results) must be suppressed. In the … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Protective sweep, Search incident | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Park ranger’s arrest of def outside park wasn’t 4A violation, even if statute violated

Reason: The Federal Government’s Plan to Track Truckers’ Every Movement Is a Privacy Nightmare

Reason: The Federal Government’s Plan to Track Truckers’ Every Movement Is a Privacy Nightmare by Jared McCain (“This surveillance would be unconstitutional—and there’s no reason to believe it will make anyone safer.”) Would it be? NYC’s taxicabs lost this battle … Continue reading →

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data | Comments Off on Reason: The Federal Government’s Plan to Track Truckers’ Every Movement Is a Privacy Nightmare

N.D.Cal.: There’s almost always PC in the contents of a stolen car, such as something of owner’s

There is probable cause to believe that there’s evidence of the crime in a stolen car. “It follows on this record that at a minimum there was also probable cause to believe that evidence of those suspected crimes (either car … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probable cause | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: There’s almost always PC in the contents of a stolen car, such as something of owner’s

IN: Juvenile’s blood draw by consent without statutory parental notification suppressed

The juvenile’s consent to a blood draw was without parental notification as required by statute, and it was expressed as a mere formality. The blood draw is suppressed. L.W. v. State, 2022 Ind. App. LEXIS 379 (Nov. 23, 2022). Defendant’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Consent, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on IN: Juvenile’s blood draw by consent without statutory parental notification suppressed

D.S.D.: Totality of circumstances showed def likely resided in dwelling for entry on arrest warrant

Based on the totality of circumstances, officers finally had good reason to believe defendant resided in the dwelling he was found in, and the arrest warrant alone was enough to justify entry. United States v. Ulrich, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Issue preclusion, Staleness | Comments Off on D.S.D.: Totality of circumstances showed def likely resided in dwelling for entry on arrest warrant

CA6: Violation of Robert’s Rules of Order prior to ptf’s arrest not a constitutional violation

Plaintiff was arrested for disorderly conduct for disrupting a public meeting after repeatedly being told to shut up. His claim that his ejection from the meeting and then the arrest violated Robert’s Rules of Order isn’t a constitutional claim. Burton … Continue reading →

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA6: Violation of Robert’s Rules of Order prior to ptf’s arrest not a constitutional violation

WI: Failure to swear SW affiant not 4A violation if officer understood it was under oath

The failure to actually ask the affiant officer “do you swear to tell the truth” isn’t constitutionally required for a search warrant affidavit. The officer need only understand that he or she was swearing to the truth of the contents. … Continue reading →

Posted in Oath or affirmation | Comments Off on WI: Failure to swear SW affiant not 4A violation if officer understood it was under oath