CA6: Violation of Robert’s Rules of Order prior to ptf’s arrest not a constitutional violation

Plaintiff was arrested for disorderly conduct for disrupting a public meeting after repeatedly being told to shut up. His claim that his ejection from the meeting and then the arrest violated Robert’s Rules of Order isn’t a constitutional claim. Burton v. City of Detroit, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 32566 (6th Cir. Nov. 23, 2022).

Jail calls are recorded, except to attorneys. People in jail have no reasonable expectation of privacy in recorded nonlegal calls. People v. Quinn, 2022 NY Slip Op 06651, 2022 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6517 (3d Dept. Nov. 23, 2022).*

A receivership is imposed on a debt relief company. The receiver is directed not to voluntarily provide documents to law enforcement or prosecutors but shall if justification for legal process or a warrant is shown to this court. FTC v. Acro Servs. LLC, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 212426 n.5 (M.D. Tenn. Nov. 21, 2022).*

This entry was posted in Prison and jail searches, Reasonableness. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.