Author Archives: Hall

Reason: WV Family Court Judge with History of Arranging Warrantless Searches Resigns

Reason: West Virginia Family Court Judge with History of Arranging Warrantless Searches Resigns by J.D. Tuccille (“We may have finally discovered a limit to judicial immunity.”)

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Reason: WV Family Court Judge with History of Arranging Warrantless Searches Resigns

D.Conn.: Govt’s mere allegation def has possessory interest in package doesn’t give him standing; he still has to show it

Defendant can’t rely on the government’s representation they believe he has a possessory interest in a parcel. He has to show it, and here he did not. United States v. Franco, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18256 (D. Conn. Feb. 3, … Continue reading →

Posted in Mail and packages, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on D.Conn.: Govt’s mere allegation def has possessory interest in package doesn’t give him standing; he still has to show it

W.D.Okla.: MJ user not barred from handgun possession under § 922(g)(3)

A marijuana user is not barred from possessing a handgun under Heller and Bruen under § 922(g)(3). The case makes passing reference to the Fourth and Second Amendments reflecting current rights in 1789. (It’s only here because it’s really interesting.) … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probable cause | Comments Off on W.D.Okla.: MJ user not barred from handgun possession under § 922(g)(3)

CA1: No REP in guns hidden in house def wasn’t welcome at when he returned after being kicked out

Defendant stayed in a house with a domestic partner and her son until he was kicked out. He returned to assault her and hide guns there. He had no reasonable expectation of privacy in the premises. United States v. John, … Continue reading →

Posted in Particularity, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA1: No REP in guns hidden in house def wasn’t welcome at when he returned after being kicked out

GA: BOLO for aggressive driver in gray car didn’t support stop

There was no reasonable suspicion for defendant’s stop for being an “aggressive driver in a gray car.” The trial court properly suppressed. State v. Glanton, 2023 Ga. App. LEXIS 55 (Feb. 3, 2023). (“In considering these factors we find (1) … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on GA: BOLO for aggressive driver in gray car didn’t support stop

KS: Chance of suicide justified public safety stop

Finding a car parked in a place where people notoriously went to commit suicide justified this public safety encounter. The officer smelled marijuana coming from the car and searched it. State v. McDonald, 2023 Kan. App. LEXIS 5 (Feb. 3, … Continue reading →

Posted in Community caretaking function, Good faith exception, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on KS: Chance of suicide justified public safety stop

CA7: GJ can subpoena target’s surveillance video of how SW was executed

The corporation was the target of a search warrant for violating the Clean Water Act. The warrant took a whole day to execute. After reviewing its own video of the premises, they made claims of misconduct against the executing officers … Continue reading →

Posted in Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on CA7: GJ can subpoena target’s surveillance video of how SW was executed

CA10: Excessive force claim not obvious, so QI applies

Plaintiff resisted getting out of her car after a traffic stop and repeated requests then orders to do so. She was taken down and claims injuries. This is not an obvious constitutional violation under Graham, so the officer gets qualified … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA10: Excessive force claim not obvious, so QI applies

CA4: GFE applied to SW application without PC but where two state court warrants followed up based on it

The government concedes there was no probable cause for the search warrant here, but two state judges also renewed the warrants based on the first one. That’s good faith. United States v. Jordan, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 2655 (4th Cir. … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA4: GFE applied to SW application without PC but where two state court warrants followed up based on it

NY3: No-knock permitted by circumstances at scene

The warrant application and warrant did not mention no-knock, but the facts and circumstances at the scene justified it. People v. Hayward, 2023 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 464, 2023 NY Slip Op 00461 (3d Dept. Feb. 2, 2023). Exigency justified … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Knock and announce | Comments Off on NY3: No-knock permitted by circumstances at scene

Miami Herald: Florida athletes may have to submit menstrual history to school

Miami Herald: Florida athletes may have to submit menstrual history to school. Anybody see a Fourth Amendment issue here, or is it just me?

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Miami Herald: Florida athletes may have to submit menstrual history to school

W.D.N.C.: Def must state phone is his to have standing to contest SW

Without acknowledging the cell phone police searched was his, defendant did not show standing to contest the search. Even so, the use of forensic software to bypass the password protection on the phone didn’t make the search unreasonable. United States … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception, Qualified immunity, Scope of search | Comments Off on W.D.N.C.: Def must state phone is his to have standing to contest SW

W.D.N.C.: Frisk by security at a bar was purely private search

Defendant was frisked by security entering a bar, and a gun was found. They kept it for the police. This was purely a private search. United States v. Wood, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16555 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 1, 2023). The district … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Plain view, feel, smell, Private search | Comments Off on W.D.N.C.: Frisk by security at a bar was purely private search

CA11: Stop on RS can’t go on indef

A stop on reasonable suspicion cannot go on indefinitely. Here, there was video of an encounter but defendant deleted it from the phone of the victim. She’d sent it to another before that, and she was trying to get it … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA11: Stop on RS can’t go on indef

OH7: Computers are portable, and PC (nexus) moves with them

There was probable cause for child pornography in defendant’s computers in his temporary home he was occupying after a fire at his home. Computers are highly portable and can easily move from place to place. State v. Boyd, 2023-Ohio-271, 2023 … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Computer and cloud searches, Consent, Nexus | Comments Off on OH7: Computers are portable, and PC (nexus) moves with them

NJ: Dispatcher’s mistake in BOLO on race of bank robber was attributable to officers and this “implicit bias” can make def’s case of pretext

NJ recognizes pretext, and the dispatcher’s wrong assumption that a bank robber was Black when race was never mentioned is attributable to the officer on the street making the stop. This mistake with “implicit bias” can be a basis for … Continue reading →

Posted in Pretext | Comments Off on NJ: Dispatcher’s mistake in BOLO on race of bank robber was attributable to officers and this “implicit bias” can make def’s case of pretext

IL: Circumstances made SW affidavit admissible at trial

The trial court abused its discretion in not permitting the defense to use the search warrant affidavit at trial that showed the warrant was targeting another person for other things other than what was found. The court cautions this may … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IL: Circumstances made SW affidavit admissible at trial

Professional Responsibility in Criminal Defense Practice (4th ed. 2023) now on Westlaw

The author’s Professional Responsibility in Criminal Defense Practice (4th ed. 2023) uploaded to Westlaw this morning. The book and ebook will be on the Thomson Reuters bookstore shortly. The table of contents is here. The first edition was published in … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Professional Responsibility in Criminal Defense Practice (4th ed. 2023) now on Westlaw

IN: Fundamental (plain) error of S&S claims requires the evidence be fabricated, not just unconstitutionally obtained

The fundamental error avenue to appeal an unobjected to search and seizure claim requires a showing that the evidence was all fabricated, not just that the search was bad. Evidence obtained by search and seizure is usually highly relevant to … Continue reading →

Posted in Standards of review, Waiver | Comments Off on IN: Fundamental (plain) error of S&S claims requires the evidence be fabricated, not just unconstitutionally obtained

USA Today: A camera mounted on a light pole took video of police beating Tyre Nichols. What to know about ‘SkyCop.’

USA Today: A camera mounted on a light pole took video of police beating Tyre Nichols. What to know about ‘SkyCop.’ by Claire Thornton:

Posted in Pole cameras, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on USA Today: A camera mounted on a light pole took video of police beating Tyre Nichols. What to know about ‘SkyCop.’