Author Archives: Hall

D.C.Cir.: SW for multiple cell phones was valid because all were shown to be involved

This search warrant for multiple cell phones showed enough that multiple cell phones were involved in the offense under investigation, and, thus, the warrant was not overbroad, distinguishing United States v. Griffith, 867 F.3d 1265 (D.C. Cir. 2017) where there … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Nexus, Privileges, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.C.Cir.: SW for multiple cell phones was valid because all were shown to be involved

PIX11: NYC implements gun-detecting technology in subway

PIX11: NYC implements gun-detecting technology in subway by Finn Hoogensen:

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on PIX11: NYC implements gun-detecting technology in subway

MT: No REP from look in apt window from common area of apt complex; not his curtilage

Officers did not violate defendant’s reasonable expectation of privacy by looking in the window of his apartment from a common area in his apartment complex. It was not his curtilage. City of Whitefish v. Zumwalt, 2024 MT 153, 2024 Mont. … Continue reading →

Posted in Border search, Cell phones, Curtilage, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on MT: No REP from look in apt window from common area of apt complex; not his curtilage

Cal.4: Defense subpoena for social media records was not improperly issued and enforced; holders of records got to be heard under SCA

Denying the state’s motion to quash a criminal subpoena duces tecum issued to social media companies was not error. Under the Stored Communications Act, the trial court allowed the companies an opportunity to be heard, conducted a sufficient analysis of … Continue reading →

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Probable cause, Stored Communications Act, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on Cal.4: Defense subpoena for social media records was not improperly issued and enforced; holders of records got to be heard under SCA

NYTimes: Gun-Detecting Technology Will Soon Appear in Subway System

NYTimes: Gun-Detecting Technology Will Soon Appear in Subway System by Ana Ley & Hurubie Meko (“A set of weapon-screening devices will be deployed at various stations over the course of a month.” “New York City officials will begin testing gun-detecting … Continue reading →

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on NYTimes: Gun-Detecting Technology Will Soon Appear in Subway System

NJ: Under NJ’s broad discovery rules, drug dog records may be discoverable

“This appeal presents a question of first impression regarding when the State may be compelled to provide field and health reports of narcotics detection canines in accordance with the Supreme Court’s holding in Florida v. Harris, 568 U.S. 237 (2013). … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff | Comments Off on NJ: Under NJ’s broad discovery rules, drug dog records may be discoverable

Reason: The DEA Claims To Be Able To Search Your Bag Without Your Consent. But Can They?

Reason: The DEA Claims To Be Able To Search Your Bag Without Your Consent. But Can They? by Patrick McDonald (“Recent footage shows a federal agent attempting to search a citizen’s bag without their consent, despite precedent saying that’s illegal.”):

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on Reason: The DEA Claims To Be Able To Search Your Bag Without Your Consent. But Can They?

Axios: A police drone might respond to your next 911

Axios: A police drone might respond to your next 911 by Joann Muller & Jessica Boehm(“A new generation of crime-fighting drones is about to take flight, starting in Arizona. Why it matters: Drones are the ultimate first responder. They can … Continue reading →

Posted in Drones, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on Axios: A police drone might respond to your next 911

VA: “‘you got nothing in the car, right?’ did not prolong the stop”

“The trial court made a factual finding that Investigator Natiello’s question lasted the same amount of time that it would have taken to simply hand the documents back to Jones. In addition, the question occurred before the investigator addressed Jones’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on VA: “‘you got nothing in the car, right?’ did not prolong the stop”

S.D.N.Y.: Cell phone SW was “bare bones” on connection to the crime; no PC, no GFE

In this racketeering case, defendant admitted for purposes of the motion to suppress he was in the gang and that people engaged in violent acts. The government never showed probable cause to believe his cell phone had evidence of a … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion, Search incident | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Cell phone SW was “bare bones” on connection to the crime; no PC, no GFE

E.D.Mich.: Cell tower dump isn’t CSLI; doesn’t require PC, but just a court order

A cell tower dump isn’t CSLI, so actual probable cause isn’t required. Here, however, there was. In re United States, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 128532 (E.D. Mich. July 18, 2024).* “Finally, the gratuitous physical aggression at the scene cannot be … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Cell site location information, Custody, Voluntariness | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Cell tower dump isn’t CSLI; doesn’t require PC, but just a court order

E.D.La.: Fire dept. can compel fingerprinting of its firefighters

A fire department can compel production of fingerprints for timekeeping purposes from its firefighters under threat of termination. There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in fingerprints. Perre v. E. Bank Consol. Special Serv. Fire Prot., 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on E.D.La.: Fire dept. can compel fingerprinting of its firefighters

CA5: GFE first (was reliance objectively reasonable), PC second

“Warrants are reviewed under a two-part test. In the first step, we determine whether the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule applies. Under that exception, ‘evidence obtained from [a] search will not be excluded’ even if ‘probable cause for a … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA5: GFE first (was reliance objectively reasonable), PC second

CA11: “[W]hile an in-the-presence observation may be sufficient for a warrantless misdemeanor arrest, it is not necessary under the Fourth Amendment.”

“[W]hile an in-the-presence observation may be sufficient for a warrantless misdemeanor arrest, it is not necessary under the Fourth Amendment.” United States v. Gonzalez, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 17813 (11th Cir. July 19, 2024):

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on CA11: “[W]hile an in-the-presence observation may be sufficient for a warrantless misdemeanor arrest, it is not necessary under the Fourth Amendment.”

W.D.Mo.: Def didn’t show he was driving overdue rented car with anyone’s permission

Defendant had no standing in the rented car he was driving. It was rented by another person, and it had not been timely returned. He didn’t show that he was driving with anyone’s permission. United States v. Manning, 2024 U.S. … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Informant hearsay, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause, Standing | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Def didn’t show he was driving overdue rented car with anyone’s permission

Reason: New Jersey Wants Your Baby’s Genes

Reason: New Jersey Wants Your Baby’s Genes by Elizabeth Nolan Brown (“Using genomic sequencing, doctors can diagnose diseases and abnormalities, reveal sensitivities to environmental stimulants, and assess a person’s risk of developing conditions such as Alzheimer’s disease. Ernest Post, chairman … Continue reading →

Posted in Body searches, DNA | Comments Off on Reason: New Jersey Wants Your Baby’s Genes

CA8: It was not clearly established at the time that a dog bite is a 4A seizure

“After an on-duty police K9 bit Officer Daniel Irish while they both pursued a suspect, he sued the K9’s handler, Deputy Keith McNamara, under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for violating his Fourth Amendment right to be free from excessive force … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine, Seizure, Standing | Comments Off on CA8: It was not clearly established at the time that a dog bite is a 4A seizure

CA11: RS existed on the totality of the stop even though the officer did not intend to issue a traffic ticket

Reasonable suspicion developed to continue the stop even though the officer didn’t intend to issue a traffic ticket. United States v. Martinez, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 17675 (11th Cir. July 18, 2024). 2255 petitioner’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim that … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA11: RS existed on the totality of the stop even though the officer did not intend to issue a traffic ticket

IL: Taking the keys to a car can still be only a Terry seizure, not an arrest

Taking the keys to a car can still be only a Terry seizure, not an arrest. Reasonable suspicion not decided below, so remanded. People v. Pellegrino, 2024 IL App (2d) 230343, 2024 Ill. App. LEXIS 1675 (July 18, 2024). Defendant’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on IL: Taking the keys to a car can still be only a Terry seizure, not an arrest

NY2: Stopping car for flashing headlights was properly taken as a possible distress call; but stop was excessive

Defendant’s flashing his high beams at a patrol car was legitimately taken as a likely distress call, but the state failed to prove there was any distress, so the continued questioning was unreasonable. People v. Serrano, 2024 NY Slip Op … Continue reading →

Posted in Digital Searches, Good faith exception, Particularity, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on NY2: Stopping car for flashing headlights was properly taken as a possible distress call; but stop was excessive