VA: “‘you got nothing in the car, right?’ did not prolong the stop”

“The trial court made a factual finding that Investigator Natiello’s question lasted the same amount of time that it would have taken to simply hand the documents back to Jones. In addition, the question occurred before the investigator addressed Jones’s running of the stop sign, informed Jones that he would not be cited for the traffic violation, and issued a warning to Jones. The ‘tasks tied to the traffic infraction’ had not been completed. Rodriguez, 575 U.S. at 353. The unrelated question ‘you got nothing in the car, right?’ did not prolong the stop. For that reason, the trial court did not err in denying the motion to suppress.” Jones v. Commonwealth, 2024 Va. App. LEXIS 426 (July 23, 2024) (unpublished).

Plaintiff’s Fourth Amendment claim against Ohio taxation authorities was previously decided against him and found barred by the Eleventh Amendment [thus res judicata]. Jabr v. Ohio Dep’t of Taxation, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 128627 (S.D. Ohio July 22, 2024).*

Defendant’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim fails. “But Smith does not allege that police lacked probable cause to search his car and he has not established that his attorney performed deficiently by not challenging this search.” There was probable cause. United States v. Smith, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 129123 (E.D. Ky. July 23, 2024).*

This entry was posted in Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.