Monthly Archives: October 2026

CA10: No standing in real property defs attempted to buy but didn’t and then wouldn’t leave

Defendants lacked standing in the real property they were attempting to buy but the deal fell through. They knew they had to leave and hadn’t yet. They essentially were trespassers, not tenants. United States v. Wahhaj, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Standing | Comments Off on CA10: No standing in real property defs attempted to buy but didn’t and then wouldn’t leave

CA11: Wrong-house raid suit barred by FTCA

Supposedly relying on a personal GPS device, the FBI SWAT team raided the wrong house, three houses from the target location and on a different street. The FTCA suit is barred under the discretionary function exception to the Federal Tort … Continue reading →

Posted in Federal Tort Claims Act, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA11: Wrong-house raid suit barred by FTCA

The Record: Oklahoma judge’s Flock ruling shows the power of Supreme Court’s digital evidence decision

The Record: Oklahoma judge’s Flock ruling shows the power of Supreme Court’s digital evidence decision by Suzanne Smalley:

Posted in Automatic license plate readers | Comments Off on The Record: Oklahoma judge’s Flock ruling shows the power of Supreme Court’s digital evidence decision

N.D.Tex.: Drone flyover approved by SW led to SW for residence

In a dog fighting investigation, Dallas PD [showing great respect for the rights of a homeowner] got a drone fly over warrant for residential property. Seeing dogs chained up in a dog fighting training configuration, officers obtained a search warrant … Continue reading →

Posted in Collective knowledge, Drones, Good faith exception, Private search | Comments Off on N.D.Tex.: Drone flyover approved by SW led to SW for residence

CNS: Colorado woman wrongfully cited for theft files class action against Flock [and the police “relying” on it]

CNS: Colorado woman wrongfully cited for theft files class action against Flock by Amanda Pampuro (“Columbine Valley Police pursued theft charges against a Colorado woman based on footage captured on Flock cameras around her hometown.”). Too much reliance on surveillance … Continue reading →

Posted in Automatic license plate readers | Comments Off on CNS: Colorado woman wrongfully cited for theft files class action against Flock [and the police “relying” on it]

S.D.N.Y.: Rule 41(g) petition for return of property granted; original seizure in NYC and Louisiana investigation hasn’t concluded

This is a Rule 41(g) petition for return of electronics seized by HSI in NYC on a Louisiana warrant for a Louisiana investigation, but no charges yet. HSI doesn’t support the basis for the seizure and hasn’t produced the warrant … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Issue preclusion, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause, Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Warrant papers | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Rule 41(g) petition for return of property granted; original seizure in NYC and Louisiana investigation hasn’t concluded

VA: NC tracking warrant validly led to conviction in VA

North Carolina officers put a warrant approved tracker on defendant’s vehicle. That out-of-state warrant led to defendant’s conviction in Virginia. The out-of-state warrant was issued on probable cause, and it didn’t violate the Fourth Amendment tracking him in Virginia. A … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Good faith exception, Qualified immunity, Scope of search, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on VA: NC tracking warrant validly led to conviction in VA

GA: Inverse condemnation suit stated claim v. state’s “police power” in drug interdiction

Blue 42 operates a licensed hemp farm registered with state and federal agriculture departments. The Georgia DPS conducted drug suppression operation using low-flying aircraft, and they destroyed two rows of Blue 42’s crops valued at $37,000. Trial court dismissed inverse … Continue reading →

Posted in Motion to suppress, Open fields, Seizure | Comments Off on GA: Inverse condemnation suit stated claim v. state’s “police power” in drug interdiction

MI: Stop was initiated on roadway but ended in driveway; stop on curtilage here was reasonable

Defendant was not improperly stopped in his curtilage. The officer was suspicious of defendant’s driving having followed him, and the officer tried to initiate the stop on the roadway. People v. Madden, 2026 Mich. App. LEXIS 8402 (Oct. 2, 2026):

Posted in Curtilage | Comments Off on MI: Stop was initiated on roadway but ended in driveway; stop on curtilage here was reasonable

Malwarebytes: Your car’s app could be telling Big Tech who you are and where you go

Malwarebytes: Your car’s app could be telling Big Tech who you are and where you go by Pieter Arntz (“A study testing 21 cars from 19 brands and 30 companion apps found connections to advertising and tracking companies, and evidence … Continue reading →

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Malwarebytes: Your car’s app could be telling Big Tech who you are and where you go

S.D.Tex.: Govt can’t raise new 4A exception in motion to reconsider

While executing a search warrant, officers compelled defendant to provide the passcode to the safe. The court suppressed the contents of the safe because it was not a valid consent. The government doesn’t get to argue inevitable discovery on a … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Standing | Comments Off on S.D.Tex.: Govt can’t raise new 4A exception in motion to reconsider

NY4: Def was missing and police couldn’t find him; entry into backyard and then house were reasonable under Mitchell and Brigham City

Applying Mitchell (1976) and Brigham City (2006), it was reasonable for the officer to enter defendant’s fenced back yard after going there on a welfare check first reported by a person claiming defendant was apparently missing. His and his girlfriend’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on NY4: Def was missing and police couldn’t find him; entry into backyard and then house were reasonable under Mitchell and Brigham City

FL5: Only matching description of anonymous caller’s burglary report wasn’t RS; nothing about def suggested he was a burglar

“In conclusion, the officers in this case corroborated nothing more than the innocent details of identification that matched Holliday’s appearance (other than the two snakes [wrapped around his neck], which the caller did not mention). The officers were entitled to … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on FL5: Only matching description of anonymous caller’s burglary report wasn’t RS; nothing about def suggested he was a burglar

CA2: Car not named in SW could be seized and searched incident to forfeiture

The warrant here was for defendant’s house and grounds. No vehicles were mentioned even though officers had knowledge defendant dealt drugs at least from one. On executing the warrant, they found the vehicle and seized it for forfeiture. Searching it … Continue reading →

Posted in Forfeiture, Particularity, Probable cause, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA2: Car not named in SW could be seized and searched incident to forfeiture

CA2: Cell phone search reasonable at the border

At the border, defendant’s cell phone was first manually searched and then forensically searched. Neither was unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment. United States v. Robinson, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 30035 (2d Cir. Oct. 1, 2026), following United States v. Alisigwe, … Continue reading →

Posted in Border search, Cell phones, First Amendment, Probation / Parole search, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA2: Cell phone search reasonable at the border

Reason: Border Agents Nabbed Their Phones. These Two Floridians Are Fighting Back.

Reason: Border Agents Nabbed Their Phones. These Two Floridians Are Fighting Back. by Matthew Petti (“Jalal ‘Jay’ Shehadeh had no reason to believe he was under suspicion from the government. A former assistant state attorney in Florida, he traveled frequently … Continue reading →

Posted in Border search, Cell phones | Comments Off on Reason: Border Agents Nabbed Their Phones. These Two Floridians Are Fighting Back.

FL3: Exclusion of evidence is a separate question from whether 4A was violated

The question of exclusion of the evidence is always separate from whether the Fourth Amendment was violated. Mercado v. State, 2026 Fla. App. LEXIS 7697 (Fla. 3d DCA Oct. 1, 2026). Defendant’s guilty plea waived his search claim in his … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on FL3: Exclusion of evidence is a separate question from whether 4A was violated

ABAJ: Could the use of AI upend privacy and security expectations in court?

ABAJ: Could the use of AI upend privacy and security expectations in court? by Amanda Robert:

Posted in AI | Comments Off on ABAJ: Could the use of AI upend privacy and security expectations in court?

404 Media: USPS To Put Cameras in Trucks That Scan Roads for ‘Community Safety’

404 Media: USPS To Put Cameras in Trucks That Scan Roads for ‘Community Safety’ by Joseph Cox (“USPS says the cameras, put on USPS truck dashboards, will scan roads, signs, and more.”) Roving Flock or pole cameras or both?

Posted in Pole cameras | Comments Off on 404 Media: USPS To Put Cameras in Trucks That Scan Roads for ‘Community Safety’

D.N.M.: Checking VIN number during traffic stop is reasonable

During a traffic stop, asking for identification and about travel plans and checking the VIN is reasonable under N.Y. v. Class. United States v. Sanchez, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 223586 (D.N.M. Sep. 30, 2026). Defendant was a passenger in a … Continue reading →

Posted in Custody, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Checking VIN number during traffic stop is reasonable