S.D.N.Y.: Stop on an NYPD I-card showing PC was reasonable

NYPD uses “I-cards” (investigation cards) which can show facts supporting probable cause. This investigation was “closed,” but the I-card still was around, and officers used it to stop and question defendant. He refused to identify himself and he ended up frisked finding a gun. And he’s a felon. The stop and frisk was with probable cause. This is collective knowledge. United States v. Anderson, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 235330 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 14, 2026).

Inevitable discovery applied to this search. Police entered and lifted a blanket conducting a search, but a warrant was obtained shortly thereafter with information separate from that search. People v. Green-Johnson, 2026 Mich. App. LEXIS 8733 (Oct. 14, 2026).*

The inventory search of defendant’s car was valid. People v. Jackson, 2026 Mich. App. LEXIS 8725 (Oct. 14, 2026).*

Defendant’s consent to blood draw was valid. State v. Fryfogle, 2026 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 696 (Oct. 15, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Collective knowledge, Consent, Inevitable discovery, Inventory, Probable cause, Stop and frisk. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.