Monthly Archives: April 2025

E.D.Pa.: A prison inmate has no standing in his cell

Correctional officers found 20 cell phones in defendant’s cell. He has no standing in his cell. As to the cell phone searches, even if he had standing, the warrants were not overbroad. United States v. Nasir, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Probable cause, Protective sweep, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: A prison inmate has no standing in his cell

OH5: Rental property ordinance can be enforced by admin. SWs

The City of Canton, Ohio has safety and sanitary standards for rental property that are reasonable and can be enforced by a Camara search warrant on administrative probable cause. Dep’t of Dev. Servs. for the City of N. Canton Ohio … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH5: Rental property ordinance can be enforced by admin. SWs

OT

Suppose persons accused with high sentencing exposure opt for a trial because they fear being deported to CECOT even if they are natural born citizens? I had such a call Friday.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on OT

S.D.N.Y.: Warrantless criminal investigative cell search was reasonable

Defendant was in pretrial detention arrested three days earlier in a murder-for-hire scheme. Jailors searched his cell, apparently as a part of the original criminal investigation, looking for cell phone which he attempted to destroy. He moved to suppress. “The … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Good faith exception, Plain view, feel, smell, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Warrantless criminal investigative cell search was reasonable

CA11: When there are multiple grounds supporting a search, appellant has to respond to all

An appellate court can affirm denial of suppression on any ground supported by the record. And, when the district court finds multiple independent grounds to deny suppression, the appellant has to rebut all of them. Here, the district court found … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Probable cause, Standards of review | Comments Off on CA11: When there are multiple grounds supporting a search, appellant has to respond to all

CA7: Post search statement of promise for consent didn’t affect consent to search

“Marcure also asserts that an officer coerced his consent by promising him that no charges would be filed, but even if a statement like this can be coercive, the complaint states that the promise occurred ‘[a]fter the search was finished.’ … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA7: Post search statement of promise for consent didn’t affect consent to search

CA6: State officers can enforce federal law

The search of defendant’s car was based on the alleged federal crime of possession of a small amount of marijuana, and a gun was found, and he was a felon in possession. State officers can arrest for violations of federal … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on CA6: State officers can enforce federal law

CW34 West Palm Beach: U.S. citizen detained in Florida under new immigration law, released after 48 hours

CW34 West Palm Beach: U.S. citizen detained in Florida under new immigration law, released after 48 hours by Grace Bellinghausen (“A 20-year-old U.S. citizen was unlawfully detained by ICE for two days following a traffic stop near the Florida border. … Continue reading

Posted in Immigration arrests, Immigration checkpoints | Comments Off on CW34 West Palm Beach: U.S. citizen detained in Florida under new immigration law, released after 48 hours

Paul Revere’s ride was 250 years ago tonight

Per Wikipedia.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Paul Revere’s ride was 250 years ago tonight

CA8: No evidence supported plaintiff’s arrest for DUI; no QI, no SJ

Plaintiff’s arrest without probable cause for driving under the influence survived summary judgment and the qualified immunity defense. Looking at the video, there is nothing that supports probable cause for plaintiff’s arrest. The defendant officers and city used a “divide … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on CA8: No evidence supported plaintiff’s arrest for DUI; no QI, no SJ

CrimLawProf: Let’s Be Reasonable About Geofence Warrants

CrimLawProf: Let’s Be Reasonable About Geofence Warrants by Stephen E. Henderson (“For years, I wrote a lot about the Fourth Amendment and new technologies (see summary in this note 6), so I was very pleased with the inflection point Carpenter … Continue reading

Posted in geofence | Comments Off on CrimLawProf: Let’s Be Reasonable About Geofence Warrants

Pole cameras FYI

Out of curiosity, I did a Lexis search of pole cameras. They’ve shown in 30 opinions so far in 2025.

Posted in Pole cameras | Comments Off on Pole cameras FYI

D.Alaska: Despite SW affidavit’s failures, search of car otherwise valid under automobile exception

The showing for the search warrant for defendant’s car and cell phone was completely deficient. As to the car, its search is sustained under the automobile exception instead, but the phone extraction is suppressed. United States v. Carlton, 2025 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Reasonableness | Comments Off on D.Alaska: Despite SW affidavit’s failures, search of car otherwise valid under automobile exception

CA8: Dog’s instinctive head in the car window wasn’t a trespass

The dog touching the car was instinctive and not handler directed. Therefore, it’s not a trespass. There’s some doubt in the existing rule in this circuit, but not here. United States v. Munoz, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 8808 (8th Cir. … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Trespass | Comments Off on CA8: Dog’s instinctive head in the car window wasn’t a trespass

NYC Formal Opinion 2025-1: A government lawyer may refuse a superior’s order to lie in court.

NYC Bar Formal Opinion 2025-1: A government lawyer may refuse a superior’s order to lie in court. “May” not “shall.” So, what about the ethical duty to report the superior for requesting the lie?

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on NYC Formal Opinion 2025-1: A government lawyer may refuse a superior’s order to lie in court.

E.D.Wis.: Affidavit’s statement def was in surveillance video was reasonable and not reckless

Officer’s statement that defendant was in a surveillance video was a reasonable conclusion, and not a reckless overstatement for Franks. United States v. Warren, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70293 (E.D. Wis. Apr. 14, 2025).* Defendant passed up a conditional plea … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: Affidavit’s statement def was in surveillance video was reasonable and not reckless

M.D.Ala.: When a car search is based on smell of MJ, it doesn’t matter that none was found

When a search is based on the smell of burnt or fresh marijuana, it doesn’t matter that none was found. United States v. Powell, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70597 (M.D. Ala. Mar. 13, 2025):

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on M.D.Ala.: When a car search is based on smell of MJ, it doesn’t matter that none was found

CO: PC a gun was in car permits search of trunk

Defendant was a suspect in a shooting incident. He was found outside a car. There was probable cause to believe the gun was inside the passenger compartment or trunk, even though the windows were down and the trunk closed when … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Scope of search | Comments Off on CO: PC a gun was in car permits search of trunk

CA4: No downward variance for 4A violation in revocation of supervised release

Defendant was on supervised release and revoked. No downward variance because the search violated the Fourth Amendment and led to dismissal of that separate case. United States v. Corbett, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 8758 (4th Cir. Apr. 14, 2025). “In … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Informant hearsay, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA4: No downward variance for 4A violation in revocation of supervised release

Bloomberg Law: Bootleggers, Cops, and Cars: How Driving Became a Privacy Trap

Bloomberg Law: Bootleggers, Cops, and Cars: How Driving Became a Privacy Trap by Cassandre Coyer, Tonya Riley & Jorja Siemons about automatic license plate readers in Norfolk VA. A subheading: “Data a Modern Car Can Collect”:

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Bloomberg Law: Bootleggers, Cops, and Cars: How Driving Became a Privacy Trap