Daily Archives: April 12, 2025

D.Md.: Is product of SW for Md. home of Jan.6 def leading to FIPF case covered by Jan.6 pardon?

Does defendant’s January 20, 2025 pardon for being a Jan. 6th Capitol defendant cover his being charged with being a felon in possession in his home when a search warrant for the Jan. 6th case was executed at his house? … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on D.Md.: Is product of SW for Md. home of Jan.6 def leading to FIPF case covered by Jan.6 pardon?

D.Nev.: Cell tower dump to solve a murder was a general warrant, but not suppressed

A California state judge issued a cell tower dump warrant to attempt to find who could have been involved in two dead bodies in the desert. The judge testified at the suppression hearing in the District of Nevada. The cell … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, General warrant | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Cell tower dump to solve a murder was a general warrant, but not suppressed

OH5: Place and time of encounter plus serious sweating and making not much sense when talking here added up to RS

Place and time of encounter plus serious sweating and making not much sense when talking added up to reasonable suspicion. State v. Doering, 2025-Ohio-1297 (5th Dist. Apr. 10, 2025).* An interesting set of facts:

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH5: Place and time of encounter plus serious sweating and making not much sense when talking here added up to RS

D.Alaska: Recklessly omitted text messages were material to PC finding; suppression granted

Omitted text messages were material to the probable cause finding, and the officer was at least reckless in not including them. Franks satisfied: “Therefore, the Court agrees with Judge Scoble’s reasoning, adopts his analysis, and finds that, had Detective Ruble … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Standards of review, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on D.Alaska: Recklessly omitted text messages were material to PC finding; suppression granted

CA10: Disabled vehicle left parked along a highway is subject to impoundment

A disabled vehicle left parked along a highway is subject to impoundment. Jones v. Woodrow, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 8419 (10th Cir. Apr. 10, 2025).* Defendant’s stop was valid because of a defective LPN light. This led to discovering a … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Inventory, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA10: Disabled vehicle left parked along a highway is subject to impoundment