Monthly Archives: October 2022

PA: State’s statement of issues for review didn’t include the precise issue argued so it’s waived

The state in its statement of issues below addressed probable cause but did not mention inevitable discovery. That amounted to a waiver. “The inevitable discovery doctrine is not a subsidiary issue to a claim of adequate probable cause to support … Continue reading

Posted in Border search, Issue preclusion, Probation / Parole search, Waiver | Comments Off on PA: State’s statement of issues for review didn’t include the precise issue argued so it’s waived

FL2: Def counsel not ineffective where search evidence not objected to had no apparent prejudice to case

Defense counsel was ineffective in not moving to suppress one piece of evidence, but defendant can’t show he was prejudiced by it on the case as a whole. Szewczyk v. State, 2022 Fla. App. LEXIS 7180 (Fla. 2d DCA Oct. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on FL2: Def counsel not ineffective where search evidence not objected to had no apparent prejudice to case

VI: Anonymous tip given observing altercation was sufficient for stop when substantially corroborated at scene

The detailed anonymous tip here was sufficient to support a stop when it was substantially corroborated at the scene. The caller observed an altercation in real time and described the two vehicles involved. It was at the top of a … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Cell phones, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on VI: Anonymous tip given observing altercation was sufficient for stop when substantially corroborated at scene

CA9: AZ GOP head denied injunction for Jan.6 committee subpoena for call logs in 1A challenge

The head of the Arizona GOP sued the January 6th Committee to block a subpoena to T-Mobile for her call records, not content, on First Amendment Free Association grounds. On appeal, the injunction is denied. This is similar to Eastman’s … Continue reading

Posted in Privileges | Comments Off on CA9: AZ GOP head denied injunction for Jan.6 committee subpoena for call logs in 1A challenge

M.D.Fla.: Alleged nice “threat” to break down door to enter on warrant was not coercive

Officer’s alleged threat to break down the door stated in a nice tone of voice was not coercive, even if true, because the officer could have. On the totality, there was consent to enter to execute the arrest warrant because … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Consent, Franks doctrine, Particularity | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Alleged nice “threat” to break down door to enter on warrant was not coercive

techdirt: Mississippi Courts Are Helping Cops Keep Search Warrants Out Of The Public’s Hands

techdirt: Mississippi Courts Are Helping Cops Keep Search Warrants Out Of The Public’s Hands by Tim Cushing (“No-knock warrants remain under fire as they continue to needlessly increase the death toll of residents who often have no idea who’s violently … Continue reading

Posted in Knock and announce, Warrant papers | Comments Off on techdirt: Mississippi Courts Are Helping Cops Keep Search Warrants Out Of The Public’s Hands

CO: Basement apt could be searched on SW for premises based on CP coming from IP address of premises

“When Dhyne encountered police outside the house, he told them that he (1) rented a separate unit in the basement and (2) used the same IP address as the subscriber. In our view, this second piece of information is critical. … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Scope of search | Comments Off on CO: Basement apt could be searched on SW for premises based on CP coming from IP address of premises

N.D.Ind.: Question is not actual reliability of police database, it is reasonableness of reliance on it

“As soon as [the officer] accessed [the database from the police car], he saw an alert suggesting that Defendant was armed. Defendant argues that Davis could not be sure of the accuracy of this information, but that hardly matters. Reasonable … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Informant hearsay, Reasonableness, Staleness | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: Question is not actual reliability of police database, it is reasonableness of reliance on it

IA: Breaking cell phone in half and throwing it out window of moving car shows abandonment

Removing a cell phone’s battery, breaking the phone in half, and throwing it out the window of a moving car is indicative of abandonment. State v. Hurdel, 2022 Iowa App. LEXIS 784 (Oct. 19, 2022). “While this [KC ordinance] provision … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Cell phones, Reasonableness | Comments Off on IA: Breaking cell phone in half and throwing it out window of moving car shows abandonment

WaPo: They got a Ring doorbell alert, then opened fire on a bystander, police say

WaPo: They got a Ring doorbell alert, then opened fire on a bystander, police say by Justine McDaniel (“The incident may provide an extreme example of the type of neighborhood vigilantism sometimes cited by critics of doorbell cameras, the benefits … Continue reading

Posted in Video surveillance | Comments Off on WaPo: They got a Ring doorbell alert, then opened fire on a bystander, police say

E.D.Mich.: Single telephone call 6 weeks before drug SW was stale

A single telephone call 6 weeks before the search warrant was sought was stale. Nothing in between. “In the context of drug crimes, ‘information goes stale very quickly “because drugs are usually sold and consumed in a prompt fashion.”’” And, … Continue reading

Posted in Staleness | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Single telephone call 6 weeks before drug SW was stale

D.S.C.: No exigency 6 hours after 911 call

Police showed up at defendant’s house six hours after a 911 call. Whatever exigency there might have been had dissipated. Everyone in the house was asleep. United States v. Miller, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 189981 (D.S.C. Oct. 17, 2022). The … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on D.S.C.: No exigency 6 hours after 911 call

W.D.N.C.: Facebook post of def with backpack full of cash a year earlier wasn’t stale

Reference in a search warrant application to a Facebook post showing defendant buying expensive jewelry with a backpack full of cash at a time when he claimed no taxable income since 2017 was not stale. United States v. Grandy, 2022 … Continue reading

Posted in Staleness | Comments Off on W.D.N.C.: Facebook post of def with backpack full of cash a year earlier wasn’t stale

CA9: In excessive force case, those that did not shoot get QI; facts on those that did are in dispute

Officers who actually fired their weapons here do not get qualified immunity, but those who did not do. Peck v. Montoya, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 28822 (9th Cir. Oct. 18, 2022):

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force | Comments Off on CA9: In excessive force case, those that did not shoot get QI; facts on those that did are in dispute

NC: Not plain error for officer to read from SW affidavit at trial

The officer’s reading from the search warrant affidavit at trial because it contained hearsay may have been error, but it wasn’t plain error. Defendant was free to cross-examine on all of that to mitigate prejudice [if he could]. State v. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Prison and jail searches, Probable cause | Comments Off on NC: Not plain error for officer to read from SW affidavit at trial

NC: Whether def was seized was what she could only believe

Defendant claimed she was lost and was stopped by police, blocking her exit. [Oversolicitously,] the court opines the officer probably thought he did nothing wrong but this was a seizure in defendant’s mind, and it was without reasonable suspicion. No … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on NC: Whether def was seized was what she could only believe

D.Mass.: Lawyer target of SW for records has no right to participate in the initial taint team review

A lawyer is the target of a search warrant. The government was using a taint team (or “filter team”) to review the materials for privileged matters. The lawyer proposed a more restrictive approach, and the government agreed with part of … Continue reading

Posted in Privileges, Taint team | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Lawyer target of SW for records has no right to participate in the initial taint team review

M.D.Pa.: 14 yo kidnapping victim’s 911 call created exigency for def’s cell phone seizure

A 14-year-old kidnapping victim called 911 that she was taken three days earlier, and defendant was finally detained as a result. His phone was seized and a warrant obtained. The seizure of the warrant was reasonable based on all the … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Emergency / exigency, Probable cause, Seizure | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: 14 yo kidnapping victim’s 911 call created exigency for def’s cell phone seizure

CA7: Finality and administrative subpoenas v. administrative SWs

After enforcement of an administrative subpoena, there may be a final order. After an execution of an administrative warrant, however, there usually isn’t because there are processes left with the agency and in court. In re Establishment Inspection of Anthony … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search | Comments Off on CA7: Finality and administrative subpoenas v. administrative SWs

The Conversation: What is Fog Reveal? A legal scholar explains the app some police forces are using to track people without a warrant

The Conversation: What is Fog Reveal? A legal scholar explains the app some police forces are using to track people without a warrant by Anne Toomey McKenna (“Government use of Fog Reveal highlights a problematic difference between data privacy law … Continue reading

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on The Conversation: What is Fog Reveal? A legal scholar explains the app some police forces are using to track people without a warrant