Daily Archives: October 20, 2022

WaPo: They got a Ring doorbell alert, then opened fire on a bystander, police say

WaPo: They got a Ring doorbell alert, then opened fire on a bystander, police say by Justine McDaniel (“The incident may provide an extreme example of the type of neighborhood vigilantism sometimes cited by critics of doorbell cameras, the benefits … Continue reading

Posted in Video surveillance | Comments Off on WaPo: They got a Ring doorbell alert, then opened fire on a bystander, police say

E.D.Mich.: Single telephone call 6 weeks before drug SW was stale

A single telephone call 6 weeks before the search warrant was sought was stale. Nothing in between. “In the context of drug crimes, ‘information goes stale very quickly “because drugs are usually sold and consumed in a prompt fashion.”’” And, … Continue reading

Posted in Staleness | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Single telephone call 6 weeks before drug SW was stale

D.S.C.: No exigency 6 hours after 911 call

Police showed up at defendant’s house six hours after a 911 call. Whatever exigency there might have been had dissipated. Everyone in the house was asleep. United States v. Miller, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 189981 (D.S.C. Oct. 17, 2022). The … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on D.S.C.: No exigency 6 hours after 911 call

W.D.N.C.: Facebook post of def with backpack full of cash a year earlier wasn’t stale

Reference in a search warrant application to a Facebook post showing defendant buying expensive jewelry with a backpack full of cash at a time when he claimed no taxable income since 2017 was not stale. United States v. Grandy, 2022 … Continue reading

Posted in Staleness | Comments Off on W.D.N.C.: Facebook post of def with backpack full of cash a year earlier wasn’t stale

CA9: In excessive force case, those that did not shoot get QI; facts on those that did are in dispute

Officers who actually fired their weapons here do not get qualified immunity, but those who did not do. Peck v. Montoya, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 28822 (9th Cir. Oct. 18, 2022):

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force | Comments Off on CA9: In excessive force case, those that did not shoot get QI; facts on those that did are in dispute

NC: Not plain error for officer to read from SW affidavit at trial

The officer’s reading from the search warrant affidavit at trial because it contained hearsay may have been error, but it wasn’t plain error. Defendant was free to cross-examine on all of that to mitigate prejudice [if he could]. State v. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Prison and jail searches, Probable cause | Comments Off on NC: Not plain error for officer to read from SW affidavit at trial

NC: Whether def was seized was what she could only believe

Defendant claimed she was lost and was stopped by police, blocking her exit. [Oversolicitously,] the court opines the officer probably thought he did nothing wrong but this was a seizure in defendant’s mind, and it was without reasonable suspicion. No … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on NC: Whether def was seized was what she could only believe

D.Mass.: Lawyer target of SW for records has no right to participate in the initial taint team review

A lawyer is the target of a search warrant. The government was using a taint team (or “filter team”) to review the materials for privileged matters. The lawyer proposed a more restrictive approach, and the government agreed with part of … Continue reading

Posted in Privileges, Taint team | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Lawyer target of SW for records has no right to participate in the initial taint team review

M.D.Pa.: 14 yo kidnapping victim’s 911 call created exigency for def’s cell phone seizure

A 14-year-old kidnapping victim called 911 that she was taken three days earlier, and defendant was finally detained as a result. His phone was seized and a warrant obtained. The seizure of the warrant was reasonable based on all the … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Emergency / exigency, Probable cause, Seizure | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: 14 yo kidnapping victim’s 911 call created exigency for def’s cell phone seizure

CA7: Finality and administrative subpoenas v. administrative SWs

After enforcement of an administrative subpoena, there may be a final order. After an execution of an administrative warrant, however, there usually isn’t because there are processes left with the agency and in court. In re Establishment Inspection of Anthony … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search | Comments Off on CA7: Finality and administrative subpoenas v. administrative SWs