Monthly Archives: October 2022

MD: Two men talking at a car idling in a parking lot in a high-crime residential area at 11:30 pm wasn’t RS

Two men talking with another in a car in a high crime area at 11:30 pm in parking lot in a residential area was not reasonable suspicion. One of the men reached into the car, but there’s no way of … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MD: Two men talking at a car idling in a parking lot in a high-crime residential area at 11:30 pm wasn’t RS

S.D.W.Va.: Protective sweep under a bed is reasonable

The protective sweep here looking under the bed was reasonable. It’s where people hide. Defendant’s contention the sweep went further isn’t clear. Some things were moved and opened, but a search warrant had been executed between the sweep and her … Continue reading

Posted in Private search, Protective sweep, Reasonableness | Comments Off on S.D.W.Va.: Protective sweep under a bed is reasonable

E.D.N.Y.: Battering down door at dawn in CP SW wasn’t unreasonable, even if uncalled for

SWAT team entry into defendant’s Queens home at dawn for child pornography on a computer was not unreasonable. The police knew that only defendant, his wife, and their children (the children were “Potential Hazards” according to their operational plan) were … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Battering down door at dawn in CP SW wasn’t unreasonable, even if uncalled for

E.D.Pa.: Threat to get SW was real and lawful and did not coerce consent

“Mr. Adams contends that the agents coerced him into giving consent involuntarily when they threatened to seize his phone and hold it until they obtained a search warrant. … I disagree. For the reasons stated below, I conclude that Mr. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Protective sweep, Reasonableness | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Threat to get SW was real and lawful and did not coerce consent

D.Neb.: Affidavits for SWs are judged by what they contain, not what they lack

Affidavits for search warrants are judged by what they contain, not what they lack. United States v. Cass, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 195502 (D. Neb. Sep. 30, 2022), adopted, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 197043 (D.Neb. Oct. 26, 2022). It was … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Excessive force, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Standards of review | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Affidavits for SWs are judged by what they contain, not what they lack

D.Md.: Using def’s key fob to find his car did not violate a REP

Using defendant’s key fob on the key removed from him in a search incident did not violate any reasonable expectation of privacy and was reasonable. United States v. Gardner, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 196575 (D. Md. Oct. 27, 2022):

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on D.Md.: Using def’s key fob to find his car did not violate a REP

D.S.D.: Traffic stop immediately moved into being a drug investigation without RS and was unreasonable

Defendant’s stop was for not having an LPN and a cracked windshield. There was a temporary permit for the vehicle and the crack wasn’t obstructing vision. Bringing in a drug dog for a sniff of car was unreasonable. The officer … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on D.S.D.: Traffic stop immediately moved into being a drug investigation without RS and was unreasonable

D.D.C.: In motion to withdraw plea, waived motion to suppress was arguable and IAC

Here, failure to file a motion to suppress on the obtaining defendant’s passcode for his cell phone was ineffective assistance of counsel. At this point, it was debatable, and it should have been raised. The government had the phones, and … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Ineffective assistance, Privileges | Comments Off on D.D.C.: In motion to withdraw plea, waived motion to suppress was arguable and IAC

D.N.J.: Encountering 4 officers at landing on stairs who wouldn’t let him pass was a seizure

Defendant encountered four officers standing on a landing, and they impeded his movements. This amounted to a seizure. United States v. Jackson, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 194856 (D.N.J. Oct. 26, 2022). Mistaken identity on the person being seized is usually … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonableness, Seizure, Standing | Comments Off on D.N.J.: Encountering 4 officers at landing on stairs who wouldn’t let him pass was a seizure

D.Nev.: Ptf states claim AT&T provided real time CSLI to police without warrant

Plaintiff’s complaint that AT&T provided real time CSLI to Reno police without a search warrant states enough of a claim to proceed for now. Houston v. AT&T, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 194789 (D. Nev. Oct. 26, 2022). Defendant was found … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Consent, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Ptf states claim AT&T provided real time CSLI to police without warrant

W.D.Pa.: Anticipatory SW’s triggering condition was package going in house; landlord’s taking it in sufficient

The triggering condition in this anticipatory warrant was the package going inside the home. Here, the landlord took it in, not defendant. Still, under Grubbs, that was sufficient. United States v. Tabor, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 194653 (W.D. Pa. Oct. … Continue reading

Posted in Anticipatory warrant | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Anticipatory SW’s triggering condition was package going in house; landlord’s taking it in sufficient

CA9: Chalking tires not a 4A violation

Disagreeing with the Sixth Circuit, the Ninth holds that chalking tires does not violate the Fourth Amendment. It was going on for nearly a century before anyone challenged it. Verdun v. City of San Diego, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 29803 … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Trespass | Comments Off on CA9: Chalking tires not a 4A violation

MO: Def’s arrest violated state law but not the 4A, so it was not unreasonable

“This appeal presents the question of whether a police officer necessarily violates the Fourth Amendment when he makes an arrest that is prohibited by state law. Relying upon Virginia v. Moore, 553 U.S. 164, 128 S. Ct. 1598, 170 L. … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Probation / Parole search, Reasonableness | Comments Off on MO: Def’s arrest violated state law but not the 4A, so it was not unreasonable

FL2: With an “extreme display of authority and … ‘overbearing tactics” was not by consent

With an “extreme display of authority and … ‘overbearing tactics” was not by consent. Dydek v. State, 2022 Fla. App. LEXIS 7253 (Fla. 2d DCA Oct. 26, 2022):

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Consent | Comments Off on FL2: With an “extreme display of authority and … ‘overbearing tactics” was not by consent

Courthouse News Service: Right to livestream traffic stops debated at Fourth Circuit

Courthouse News Service: Right to livestream traffic stops debated at Fourth Circuit by Erika Williams (“A shouting match erupted between a judge and an attorney at a hearing over whether passengers in cars pulled over by police can broadcast their … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Privileges | Comments Off on Courthouse News Service: Right to livestream traffic stops debated at Fourth Circuit

IN: Male occupant’s consent to search his house didn’t include the purse of a woman that lived there

Male occupant’s consent to search his house didn’t include the purse of a woman that lived there. The officer could not reasonably believe that he had apparent authority over that. Cinamon v. State, 2022 Ind. App. LEXIS 345 (Oct. 25, … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Arrest or entry on arrest, Issue preclusion, Scope of search | Comments Off on IN: Male occupant’s consent to search his house didn’t include the purse of a woman that lived there

techdirt: Investigation: Child Protective Services Agencies Nearly Always Blow Off Warrant Requirements To Enter Homes

techdirt: Investigation: Child Protective Services Agencies Nearly Always Blow Off Warrant Requirements To Enter Homes by Tim Cushing:

Posted in Administrative search | Comments Off on techdirt: Investigation: Child Protective Services Agencies Nearly Always Blow Off Warrant Requirements To Enter Homes

The Guardian: California sheriff’s office stops Black drivers five times more often than white people, data shows

The Guardian: California sheriff’s office stops Black drivers five times more often than white people, data shows by Sam Levin (“A new report says sheriffs’ patrols spend more time conducting racially biased stops than they do responding to calls for … Continue reading

Posted in Pretext | Comments Off on The Guardian: California sheriff’s office stops Black drivers five times more often than white people, data shows

CA6: Search of building next door to def’s building wasn’t reason to suppress def’s search

Officers with a search warrant for 8537 Old Rutledge Pike, Knox County, Tennessee also searched what they believed was an outbuilding at 8533 with a power cord running between them with no indication it was different property. At worst, this … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Ineffective assistance, Overseizure, Probable cause, Scope of search | Comments Off on CA6: Search of building next door to def’s building wasn’t reason to suppress def’s search

N.D.Okla.: Local officer’s arresting in Indian country prior to McGirt was with good faith

A local officer’s arrest of an Indian in Indian country prior to McGirt was with good faith. United States v. Little, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 192907 (N.D. Okla. Oct. 24, 2022). Drug interdiction officers working the Detroit Greyhound station because … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on N.D.Okla.: Local officer’s arresting in Indian country prior to McGirt was with good faith