Monthly Archives: February 2022

S.D.N.Y.: A reasonably conducted eviction is not a 4A violation

“Most eviction-type seizures do not violate the Fourth Amendment. Thomas v. Cohen, 304 F.3d 563, 574 (6th Cir. 2002) (citing Soldal v. Cook County, 506 U.S. 56, 71, 113 S. Ct. 538, 121 L. Ed. 2d 450 (1992)). Seizing an … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Motion to suppress, Probable cause, Seizure, Warrant execution | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: A reasonably conducted eviction is not a 4A violation

FL2: Resisting illegal arrest without violence not a crime

Where it was clearly shown defendant’s arrest was unlawful because he was told to come out of his house to be arrested, his resisting without violence conviction could not stand. Seiracki v. State, 2022 Fla. App. LEXIS 1040 (Fla. 2d … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on FL2: Resisting illegal arrest without violence not a crime

WaPo: Facial recognition firm Clearview AI tells investors it’s seeking massive expansion beyond law enforcement

WaPo: Facial recognition firm Clearview AI tells investors it’s seeking massive expansion beyond law enforcement by Drew Harwell (“The company is pushing toward 100 billion images in its ‘index of faces,’ even as lawmakers worry the company poses a dangerous … Continue reading

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on WaPo: Facial recognition firm Clearview AI tells investors it’s seeking massive expansion beyond law enforcement

D.Conn.: Dropping a bag when stopped, walking away from it, and then denying having it was abandonment

Defendant had a red Nike bag on him when the car was stopped, and he got out of the car and dropped it on the ground and walked away from it. When questioned about the bag, he denied he’d dropped … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Conn.: Dropping a bag when stopped, walking away from it, and then denying having it was abandonment

C.D.Ill.: Jail telephone provider can’t be sued under the 4A for recording telephone calls

A jail telephone provider can’t be sued under the Fourth Amendment for recording telephone calls. An alleged violation of the Illinois wiretapping statute is not a constitutional violation. Hunt v. Securus Techs., 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26452 (C.D.Ill. Feb. 15, … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on C.D.Ill.: Jail telephone provider can’t be sued under the 4A for recording telephone calls

Reason: Teacher Spying Is Instilling Surveillance Culture Into Students

Reason: Teacher Spying Is Instilling Surveillance Culture Into Students by Liam Day (“‘We totally stalked what they were doing on Google,’ one teacher said.”)

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Reason: Teacher Spying Is Instilling Surveillance Culture Into Students

W.D.Wash.: Extensive surveillance of def showed PC

The government’s extensive surveillance evidence of defendant showed probable cause for the warrant. United States v. Alvarez-Quinonez, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26292 (W.D.Wash. Feb. 14, 2022).* Defendant’s claim of racial profiling pleads no facts and is denied. He can, however, … Continue reading

Posted in Pretext, Probable cause, Reasonableness | Comments Off on W.D.Wash.: Extensive surveillance of def showed PC

W.D.Va.: Def’s resisting execution of a SW was a factor in finding dangerousness to deny release pending trial

Defendant’s resisting his arrest, including a search warrant, was a factor in denying release pending trial. United States v. Wagoner, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25232 (W.D.Va. Feb. 11, 2022). Questions of fact exist on whether plaintiff’s forced digital rectal exam … Continue reading

Posted in Body searches, Issue preclusion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on W.D.Va.: Def’s resisting execution of a SW was a factor in finding dangerousness to deny release pending trial

N.D.Ga.: Officers can enter a bathroom for a protective sweep

The protective sweep of the bathroom was justified and defendant’s claim the officers didn’t need to enter the bathroom to look is rejected. United States v. Perez, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26275 (N.D.Ga. Feb. 15, 2022). Plaintiff inmate’s claim that … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Protective sweep | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Officers can enter a bathroom for a protective sweep

C.D.Cal.: Eastman’s claim 1/6 House Committee’s subpoena is without authority or overbroad is denied

John Eastman’s claims against the Jan. 6 House Committee subpoena for records fail on his claim for injunctive relief. (Attorney-client privilege will be taken up later.) Eastman v. Thompson, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25546 (C.D.Cal. Jan. 25, 2022). On the … Continue reading

Posted in Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on C.D.Cal.: Eastman’s claim 1/6 House Committee’s subpoena is without authority or overbroad is denied

WaPo: As lethal fentanyl flows across Mexico border, CBP tries powerful scanning technology

WaPo: As lethal fentanyl flows across Mexico border, CBP tries powerful scanning technology by Nick Miroff (“With fatal drug overdose deaths in the United States soaring to record levels, Congress has directed U.S. Customs and Border Protection to come up … Continue reading

Posted in Border search | Comments Off on WaPo: As lethal fentanyl flows across Mexico border, CBP tries powerful scanning technology

E.D.N.Y.: Attenuation doctrine applies to this SEC interview; in dicta, no 4A violation

Even assuming the exclusionary rule applies to the SEC in this case, the attenuation doctrine applies. There is no direct or indirect evidence derived from the SEC’s action. As to the direct, “The Court finds that, even if the exclusionary … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Attenuation doctrine applies to this SEC interview; in dicta, no 4A violation

AP: Man whose home was bombed by police holds off on rebuilding

AP: Man whose home was bombed by police holds off on rebuilding:

Posted in Search, Warrant execution | Comments Off on AP: Man whose home was bombed by police holds off on rebuilding

NYTimes: I Used Apple AirTags, Tiles and a GPS Tracker to Watch My Husband’s Every Move

NYTimes: I Used Apple AirTags, Tiles and a GPS Tracker to Watch My Husband’s Every Move by Kashmir Hill (“A vast location-tracking network is being built around us so we don’t lose our keys: One couple’s adventures in the consumer … Continue reading

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on NYTimes: I Used Apple AirTags, Tiles and a GPS Tracker to Watch My Husband’s Every Move

AL adopts new crime exception to exclusionary rule

When being arrested, defendant pulled away from officers in his room and dove for his bed and reached under a pillow. Officers thought he was going for a gun, and a melee ensued. He was charged with assault and resisting … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Exclusionary rule, Independent source | Comments Off on AL adopts new crime exception to exclusionary rule

SD: Call about a mere “argument” at 2:48 am didn’t support def’s stop leaving apartment parking lot

The community caretaking exception did not apply to defendant’s stop leaving an apartment parking lot at 2:48 am. A child called the police about an argument in the house, but nothing in the call or the report from dispatch indicated … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on SD: Call about a mere “argument” at 2:48 am didn’t support def’s stop leaving apartment parking lot

HI: When valid SW executed, no 5A taking involved

When a valid search warrant is executed, there is no Fifth Amendment taking. Young v. Haw. Island Humane Soc’y S.P.C.A., 2022 Haw. App. LEXIS 21 (Feb. 9, 2022) (unpublished). “Here, the totality of the circumstances then appearing to the officers … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Warrant execution | Comments Off on HI: When valid SW executed, no 5A taking involved

N.D.Ill.: A “network of pole cameras” doesn’t violate 4A

Five pole cameras were trained on defendant’s house. A “network of pole cameras” isn’t a Fourth Amendment violation. See United States v. Tuggle, 4 F.4th 505 (7th Cir. 2021). Moreover, he does not rebut the presumption of good faith with … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Good faith exception, Pole cameras | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: A “network of pole cameras” doesn’t violate 4A

MA: State law requires PC for pole camera surveillance, and officers had it

Pole camera surveillance in Massachusetts requires probable cause to set it up. Officers had it in defendant’s case, and his front door and left side of his house were watched for 15 days. Commonwealth v. Comenzo, 2022 Mass. LEXIS 54 … Continue reading

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Pole cameras | Comments Off on MA: State law requires PC for pole camera surveillance, and officers had it

E.D.N.Y.: No REP in pawnshop records uploaded to pawnshop detail

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in pawnshop records uploaded for the NYPD pawnshop detail. (Therefore, in the trial of this case, attacking the datamining of the NYPD for information is more prejudicial than relevant under F.R.E. 403.) Gem … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Arrest or entry on arrest, Issue preclusion, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: No REP in pawnshop records uploaded to pawnshop detail