Daily Archives: February 9, 2022

D.Idaho: USMs at EPA execution of administrative SW not unreasonable

The presence of U.S. Marshals helping execute an EPA administrative warrant did not make the search unreasonable. Ace Black Ranches v. United States EPA, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22284 (D.Idaho Feb. 4, 2022). Decedent’s shooting during an apparent child kidnapping … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.Idaho: USMs at EPA execution of administrative SW not unreasonable

CA11: Computer searches as condition of supervised release for gun crime not plain error

The district court did not plainly err in allowing supervised release searches of defendant’s computer for a gun crime. U.S.S.G. § 5D1.3(d)(7). Under precedent, a search condition does not have to be specifically related to the crime. United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probation / Parole search, Staleness, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on CA11: Computer searches as condition of supervised release for gun crime not plain error

GA: Even if knock-and-talk was valid, expanding entry onto the curtilage wasn’t

The knock-and-talk here was reasonable in its inception, but the officer violated the curtilage by inspecting a car parked there. The state’s argument that reasonable suspicion permitted approaching the car was not raised below so it’s waived. “Furthermore, even if … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Curtilage, Knock and talk, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on GA: Even if knock-and-talk was valid, expanding entry onto the curtilage wasn’t

CA3: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to sentencing unless enhancing sentence was reason for the search

The exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to sentencing factors unless the illegal search was intended to enhance the sentence. United States v. Torres, 926 F.2d 321 (3d Cir. 1991). “[W]e refused to follow Verdugo in Torres because the facts in Torres … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on CA3: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to sentencing unless enhancing sentence was reason for the search

W.D.Mo.: Brady doesn’t apply to suppression motions in this circuit yet

Brady doesn’t apply here to impeachment information that could have been used to cross-examine the officer that only slightly would improve defendant’s chances on a motion he waived by pleading guilty. The law is split that Brady doesn’t apply to … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Waiver | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Brady doesn’t apply to suppression motions in this circuit yet

WaPo: U.S. Capitol Police rejects GOP congressman’s claim that check of his open office is illegal investigation

WaPo: U.S. Capitol Police rejects GOP congressman’s claim that check of his open office is illegal investigation (“Chief Tom Manger said a Capitol Police officer entered Rep. Troy E. Nehls’s office in November because the door was left ‘open and … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on WaPo: U.S. Capitol Police rejects GOP congressman’s claim that check of his open office is illegal investigation