E.D.N.Y.: No REP in pawnshop records uploaded to pawnshop detail

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in pawnshop records uploaded for the NYPD pawnshop detail. (Therefore, in the trial of this case, attacking the datamining of the NYPD for information is more prejudicial than relevant under F.R.E. 403.) Gem Fin. Serv. v. City of New York, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24256 (E.D.N.Y. Feb. 10, 2022).

All alleged illegal search was not grounds for a petition for writ of error coram nobis. Also, this was always known, and a third party with more control over the property consented to the search. McFerrin v. State, 2022 Ark. 22 (Feb. 10, 2022).*

Plaintiff’s complaint he was wrongfully arrested for murder was barred by Heck because he was convicted of murder. Wright v. Ellis, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 253177 (C.D.Cal. Dec. 29, 2021).* [However, an illegal arrest, without more, has never been viewed as a bar to subsequent prosecution, nor as a defense to a valid conviction. Ker v. Illinois, 119 U.S. 436, 444 (1886); Frisbie v. Collins, 342 U.S. 519, 522 (1952); Gerstein v. Pugh, 420 U.S. 103, 119 (1975); United States v. Crews, 445 U.S. 463, 474 (1980). So what gives? Besides all that, as a practical matter, would a civil jury really care that a murderer was wrongfully arrested?]

This entry was posted in Administrative search, Arrest or entry on arrest, Issue preclusion, Reasonable expectation of privacy. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.