Daily Archives: February 10, 2022

D.Minn.: Govt’s suggestion in briefing in opposition to motion to suppress CI was a witness requires disclosure

The government’s brief in opposition to defendant’s motion to suppress suggests that the CI is a potential witness here, so the government is ordered to disclose his or her ID. Disclosure is enough. The court won’t go so far as … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonableness | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Govt’s suggestion in briefing in opposition to motion to suppress CI was a witness requires disclosure

D.N.J.: Prosecutor absolutely immune for SW application

A prosecutor is absolutely immune in presenting search warrant applications to a court. Miller v. Rivas, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22754 (D.N.J. Feb. 8, 2022). The affidavit for search warrant here was based on probable cause. The executing officers waited … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on D.N.J.: Prosecutor absolutely immune for SW application

NY2: Def stated IAC claim that defense counsel never looked at SW materials

Defendant stated a claim for ineffective assistance of counsel that defense counsel never obtained the search warrant materials to even investigate. Reversed to have the state produce it. People v. Tindley, 2022 NY Slip Op 00886, 2022 N.Y. App. Div. … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on NY2: Def stated IAC claim that defense counsel never looked at SW materials

CA11: Not clearly established warning required before use of deadly force

It was not well established that police need to warn armed people before shooting them. Here, the shooting victim was an innocent homeowner who had a gun on him around his own house investigating a prowler, and the police saw … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: Not clearly established warning required before use of deadly force