Monthly Archives: August 2021

W.D.Mo.: Even if pretextual, this stop was otherwise reasonable

The traffic stop here was reasonable even if pretextual. United States v. Brown, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 155885 (W.D.Mo. July 30, 2021).* There was justification for defendant’s stop: driving 100 mph and other traffic violations. United States v. Young, 2021 … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Mail and packages, Pretext, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Even if pretextual, this stop was otherwise reasonable

CA11: New facts of alleged illegal search already ruled on not appropriate for successor habeas

Defendant’s attempt at a successor habeas on four grounds includes one that there is new evidence that he was wrongfully arrested. That was previously addressed before the new evidence claim, and it’s denied. “ An applicant cannot create a new … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Qualified immunity, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on CA11: New facts of alleged illegal search already ruled on not appropriate for successor habeas

CA7: Destruction or sale of seized property wasn’t unreasonable or a taking

Property lawfully seized by the city is destroyed or sold after a short while if unclaimed. That doesn’t make it an unreasonable seizure or a taking. Conyers v. City of Chicago, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 24676 (7th Cir. Aug. 18, … Continue reading

Posted in Privileges, Seizure | Comments Off on CA7: Destruction or sale of seized property wasn’t unreasonable or a taking

W.D.N.Y.: Govt’s failure to raise GFE before USMJ is waiver

Government waived the good faith exception by not raising it before the USMJ. United States v. Stearns, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 154919 (W.D.N.Y. Aug. 17, 2021). The trial court didn’t make sufficient findings on whether a handgun in plain view … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Plain view, feel, smell, Waiver | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: Govt’s failure to raise GFE before USMJ is waiver

D.Minn.: How search occurred shows USMJ no credibility on officer’s claim they could smell MJ

USMJ R&R finds officer not credible on his claim that he could smell marijuana in the car as justification for its search. United States v. Rolenc, 20-cr-137 (NEB/ECW) (D.Minn. Aug. 12, 2021). It’s a fascinating look at how the defense … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Minn.: How search occurred shows USMJ no credibility on officer’s claim they could smell MJ

NYTimes: The Illusion of Privacy Is Getting Harder to Sell

NYTimes: The Illusion of Privacy Is Getting Harder to Sell by Greg Bensinger:

Posted in Digital privacy, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on NYTimes: The Illusion of Privacy Is Getting Harder to Sell

ND: Search of passenger’s person for smell of MJ in car was unreasonable

Defendant’s patdown as a passenger on smell of marijuana was reasonable during the stop, but a search of his person was not. There was no justification for a search of his person. State v. K.V. (In the Interest of K.V.), … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Probable cause, Scope of search, Standing | Comments Off on ND: Search of passenger’s person for smell of MJ in car was unreasonable

CAAF: When PC for warrant was a close call, GFE applies

The question of probable cause for defendant’s UA was a close call. Therefore, the good faith exception applies. The officers essentially did everything right and that should be rewarded, and there’s no reason to reverse the finding of probable cause … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Military searches | Comments Off on CAAF: When PC for warrant was a close call, GFE applies

CA10: No Bivens remedy for false arrest and malicious prosecution

No Bivens remedy for false arrest and malicious prosecution. Even if wrong, there was qualified immunity here. Boudette v. Buffington, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 24512 (10th Cir. Aug. 17, 2021). The citizen informant called police to say that there was … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Emergency / exigency, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on CA10: No Bivens remedy for false arrest and malicious prosecution

CA9: Interpol “Red Notice” of another country’s arrest warrant doesn’t satisfy the Fourth Amendment

An Interpol “Red Notice” of another country’s arrest warrant doesn’t satisfy the Fourth Amendment. (DoJ agrees.) Sura v. Garland, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 24508 n.3 (9th Cir. Aug. 17, 2021):

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on CA9: Interpol “Red Notice” of another country’s arrest warrant doesn’t satisfy the Fourth Amendment

NE: No REP in cell in pretrial detention for evidence of witness tampering; also, SW obtained

The state got a search warrant for a pretrial detainee’s county jail cell for evidence of witness tampering. The search was not institutional security. The trial court suppressed, but the court of appeals reversed: there is no reasonable expectation of … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on NE: No REP in cell in pretrial detention for evidence of witness tampering; also, SW obtained

W.D.Pa.: Verizon voluntarily providing CSLI was not a 4A violation

Verizon voluntarily providing CSLI when it found out a search warrant was coming was not a Fourth Amendment violation. [This would also be inevitable discovery.] United States v. Searcy, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 153522 (W.D.Pa. Aug. 16, 2021). None of … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Verizon voluntarily providing CSLI was not a 4A violation

CA8: Handcuffing for two minutes was not an unreasonable seizure when based on furtive movements

Plaintiffs’ handcuffing for two minutes because of furtive movements was reasonable. “Based on the totality of the circumstances, we conclude that the investigative detention did not become an arrest here because Officer Marzolf only used handcuffs briefly (under two minutes) … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Cell site location information, Seizure | Comments Off on CA8: Handcuffing for two minutes was not an unreasonable seizure when based on furtive movements

CA8: Use of ketamine on agitated person leading to injury was reasonable

The use of ketamine on an intoxicated and suicidal person, and one in probable mental distress, too, was not excessive force, even though she was put into respiratory distress. Buckley v. Hennepin Cty., 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 24257 (8th Cir. … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on CA8: Use of ketamine on agitated person leading to injury was reasonable

CA2 en banc: Directions to a suspect don’t make a stop a search without a trespass or an intrusion into a REP

CA2 en banc, summary by the court (8-3): “This case presents what is, in some respects, a familiar question: whether a police officer’s pat-down search of a suspect for weapons was reasonable under the Fourth Amendment. Based on the facts … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Trespass | Comments Off on CA2 en banc: Directions to a suspect don’t make a stop a search without a trespass or an intrusion into a REP

D.N.M.: Truck inspection stop valid admin search under Burger

The New Mexico regulatory scheme for truck inspections has already been held to satisfy Burger. Stopping defendants’ truck for inspection at an inspection station was reasonable under that standard. On opening the trailer to compare to the bills of lading, … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Cell phones, Privileges | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Truck inspection stop valid admin search under Burger

N.D.Miss.: No exclusion for knock-and-announce violation

“Engram is simply incorrect that the exclusionary rule may apply when a no-knock warrant application fails to establish justification for a no-knock entry. See United States v. White, 990 F.3d 488, 493 (6th Cir. 2021) (‘Whether this affidavit sufficed to … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Knock and announce | Comments Off on N.D.Miss.: No exclusion for knock-and-announce violation

CA7: Franks issue moot by other PC

A warrant wasn’t needed to seize a cell phone, but one was to search it, and they had one. Attacking the CI’s credibility fails as an issue, Franks or otherwise, because there is other probable cause for the warrant. United … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on CA7: Franks issue moot by other PC

CA4: Dog sniff before traffic ticket finished was reasonable

Dog sniff occurred here during the initial ordinary incidents of the traffic stop and writing a ticket so it didn’t extend the stop. United States v. Junkins, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 24174 (4th Cir. Aug. 13, 2021). Defendant’s vehicle was … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA4: Dog sniff before traffic ticket finished was reasonable

CA8: Taking box off FedEx conveyor belt for dog sniff didn’t deprive FedEx of custody

Moving a suspicious looking box from the FedEx conveyor belt to a back room for a dog sniff did not require reasonable suspicion nor did it deprive FedEx of custody of the box. The dog alert provided justification for a … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Mail and packages, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure, Staleness, Standing | Comments Off on CA8: Taking box off FedEx conveyor belt for dog sniff didn’t deprive FedEx of custody