Category Archives: Seizure

CA11: Denial of 41(g) motion for return of property not appealable while case or investigation is going on

Denial of a Rule 41(g) motion for return of property lacks jurisdiction for an interlocutory appeal when there’s a pending criminal investigation. Burke v. United States, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 12590 (11th Cir. May 24, 2024). “Considering the totality of … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Seizure | Comments Off on CA11: Denial of 41(g) motion for return of property not appealable while case or investigation is going on

CA10: Eight-hour seizure of home investigating OD before getting SW was unreasonable

“After Corban Elmore’s teenage son suffered a drug overdose at Elmore’s home, law-enforcement officers secured the scene and prohibited anyone from entering the house. The officers then continued to investigate and allowed almost eight hours to elapse before applying for … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity, Reasonableness, Seizure, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA10: Eight-hour seizure of home investigating OD before getting SW was unreasonable

MA: Cell phone call logs don’t require a search warrant

Cell phone call logs don’t require a search warrant to get them. “Despite the narrowing of the third-party doctrine in other contexts, it remains applicable to call detail records. Notwithstanding recent technological changes, the phone numbers an individual dials are … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Seizure, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on MA: Cell phone call logs don’t require a search warrant

DC: Lights, coming out of car with hand on gun, and “Let me see your hands” was a seizure

This was a show of authority: “With the emergency lights activated, each officer exited the vehicle and yelled, ‘Let me see your hands’ and quickly approached Mr. Mitchell. Officer Phillip had a hand on her firearm while doing so. Officers … Continue reading

Posted in Border search, Cell phones, Custody, Seizure | Comments Off on DC: Lights, coming out of car with hand on gun, and “Let me see your hands” was a seizure

DE: Officers approaching men on a stoop at night with a police dog saying “nobody move” was a seizure

Officers approaching men on a stoop at 10 pm with a police dog and saying “nobody move” was a seizure. Here it was with reasonable suspicion based on a CI’s information that was detailed, reliable, and significantly corroborated. State v. … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Exclusionary rule, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on DE: Officers approaching men on a stoop at night with a police dog saying “nobody move” was a seizure

W.D.Pa.: Affidavit for SW doesn’t have to say CI was reliable when the facts and circumstances alleged showed it

Defendant’s allegations of the police not saying in the warrant affidavit the CI was reliable doesn’t matter because the affidavit for warrant shows otherwise why the CI was credited. There was probable cause. To the extent this would be considered … Continue reading

Posted in Custody, Informant hearsay, Seizure | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Affidavit for SW doesn’t have to say CI was reliable when the facts and circumstances alleged showed it

CA9: Officer stopping to check on an already stopped motorcycle wasn’t a seizure

Defendant’s motorcycle was already stopped on the side of the road. The officer pulling up to check on him wasn’t a seizure. United States v. Melgoza, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 8384 (9th Cir. Apr. 8, 2024). FISA warrants have a … Continue reading

Posted in FISA, Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Seizure | Comments Off on CA9: Officer stopping to check on an already stopped motorcycle wasn’t a seizure

CA10: Def’s possession of a gun six days ago can add to RS now

In the reasonable suspicion calculus, the fact defendant had a gun six days earlier can be a factor in reasonable suspicion now. United States v. Minners, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 7734 (10th Cir. Apr. 2, 2024). Plaintiffs were loaded on … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Seizure, Staleness | Comments Off on CA10: Def’s possession of a gun six days ago can add to RS now

CA7: False arrest claims before trial are 4A claims; due process after trial

“Claims for false arrest prior to trial are appropriately considered under the Fourth Amendment, not the Fourteenth Amendment. Manuel v. City of Joliet, Illinois, 580 U.S. 357, 367 (2017) (‘If the complaint is that a form of legal process resulted … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Arrest or entry on arrest, Consent, Immigration arrests, Seizure | Comments Off on CA7: False arrest claims before trial are 4A claims; due process after trial

NV: The state’s ability to seize a cell phone with exigency doesn’t include the power to search it

The ability to seize a cell phone with exigent circumstances doesn’t include the state’s ability to search it without a warrant. Smith v. State, 2024 Nev. LEXIS 14 (Mar. 28, 2024). Defendant wasn’t seized when the officer first approached him. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Inventory, Seizure | Comments Off on NV: The state’s ability to seize a cell phone with exigency doesn’t include the power to search it

CA11: There was PC to take def’s picture in public; seizure question moot

Regardless of whether defendant was seized, there was probable case to encounter him and take his picture in a public place. United States v. Daniels, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 7522 (11th Cir. Mar. 29, 2024). Defendant wasn’t seized when he … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Seizure | Comments Off on CA11: There was PC to take def’s picture in public; seizure question moot

D.C.Cir.: Telling def to “chill out” not a seizure

“Officer Jones never made such a show of authority; he simply told Hagan, while in uniform and in a ‘conversational tone,’ to ‘chill out.’ … Jones neither told Hagan to stop nor asked him any questions. An approach by a … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Seizure | Comments Off on D.C.Cir.: Telling def to “chill out” not a seizure

Iowa does not recognize state constitutional torts; here excessive force

Iowa does not recognize state constitutional torts; here excessive force. “Krystal Wagner, individually and as the administrator of the estate of her son, Shane Jensen, appeals the district court decision granting summary judgment to the State and Officer William Spece … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Seizure, State constitution | Comments Off on Iowa does not recognize state constitutional torts; here excessive force

S.D.Ohio: Defense of denial of possession in drug case meant no assertion of standing to challenge the search, so no IAC

Since the defense was not my dope, not filing a motion to suppress where standing would have to be pled and shown was not ineffective assistance of counsel. United States v. Robinson, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52526 (S.D. Ohio Mar. … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Seizure, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: Defense of denial of possession in drug case meant no assertion of standing to challenge the search, so no IAC

VA: Asleep in one’s car isn’t RS

Defendant asleep in his car wasn’t reasonable suspicion. Marijuana found. Harvell v. Commonwealth, 2024 Va. App. LEXIS 142 (Mar. 19, 2024) (unpublished).* Plaintiff’s excessive force claim under Bivens is barred by Egbert. Butler v. Trett, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 6469 … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on VA: Asleep in one’s car isn’t RS

C.D.Cal.: Police missing target and shooting innocent bystander is a 4A seizure, but with QI

Shooting at a suspect and hitting an innocent bystander is a Fourth Amendment seizure under Brower and Torres, but it gets qualified immunity. Larocca v. City of L.A., 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45650 (C.D. Cal. Mar. 14, 2024):

Posted in Qualified immunity, Seizure | Comments Off on C.D.Cal.: Police missing target and shooting innocent bystander is a 4A seizure, but with QI

E.D.Mo.: Strip search of civilly committed patient refusing pat search was reasonable and with QI

Plaintiff was strip searched when civilly committed when she refused to permit a pat search. “Considering all the circumstances described in Plaintiff’s Complaint, the search Plaintiff underwent, though surely unpleasant, was not unreasonable. “But even if the Court concluded the … Continue reading

Posted in Qualified immunity, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Seizure, Strip search | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Strip search of civilly committed patient refusing pat search was reasonable and with QI

AR: Computer crash losing drug dog’s performance record doesn’t doom search

The loss of the drug dog’s performance record from a computer crash didn’t make the dog’s alert on the highway unreasonable because those records are of marginal importance. The circuit court resolved credibility questions. No inference of spoliation will be … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on AR: Computer crash losing drug dog’s performance record doesn’t doom search

N.D.Ga.: Assuming without deciding standing to challenge a college email account, there was PC for the email warrant

Defendant sent threatening emails through his Georgia Tech account. He also sent private emails with tax and property information. He raised a Franks challenge, too. Assuming without deciding he has standing to challenge the email search, there was probable cause … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, E-mail, Seizure, Waiver | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Assuming without deciding standing to challenge a college email account, there was PC for the email warrant

TX5: lack of a prompt determination of PC to detain def is moot by the time the trial starts

The lack of a prompt determination of probable cause to detain defendant is moot by the time the trial starts. Moses v. State, 2024 Tex. App. LEXIS 950 (Tex. App. – Dallas Feb. 6, 2024). “Taking as true that Agent … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Excessive force, Seizure | Comments Off on TX5: lack of a prompt determination of PC to detain def is moot by the time the trial starts