Category Archives: Qualified immunity

CA11: Ga. Ct. App. case on point not “clearly established law”

“Orr argues, nevertheless, that it was clearly established that the Deputies could not search him and seize his property pursuant to the order, citing State v. Burgess, 826 S.E.2d 352 (Ga. App. 2019). We disagree. For starters, Burgess is an … Continue reading →

Posted in Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: Ga. Ct. App. case on point not “clearly established law”

CA11: Two on deadly force in shooting at cars: one reasonable, one a fact dispute

Officer shooting at a car driving toward him acted reasonably. “Officer Brown reasonably perceived that his life was in danger when the Pontiac shifted into reverse. Redwine had led the police on a high-speed chase through commercial and residential areas … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CA11: Two on deadly force in shooting at cars: one reasonable, one a fact dispute

D.N.J.: No REP in one’s name

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in one’s name. Livingstone v. Hugo Boss Store, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 165848 (D.N.J. Sept. 1, 2021). Officers working off duty security came upon decedent’s car at night parked across parking spaces, and … Continue reading →

Posted in Qualified immunity, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on D.N.J.: No REP in one’s name

ABAJ: Chemerinsky: The Supreme Court has done a poor job protecting against police abuse of power and racism

ABAJ: Chemerinsky: The Supreme Court has done a poor job protecting against police abuse of power and racism by Erwin Chemerinsky:

Posted in Qualified immunity, SCOTUS | Comments Off on ABAJ: Chemerinsky: The Supreme Court has done a poor job protecting against police abuse of power and racism

CA6: Parking enforcement chalking not a valid administrative search but QI immunity applies

“The City of Saginaw routinely chalked car tires to enforce its parking regulations. In our prior opinion, we held that doing so is a search for Fourth Amendment purposes, and that ‘based on the pleadings stage of this litigation, … … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA6: Parking enforcement chalking not a valid administrative search but QI immunity applies

ID: Def has burden of proving standing and can’t rely on state seeking to prove he didn’t have standing

Defendant had the burden of showing standing, and he couldn’t rely on the state not proving he didn’t have standing. Wilson v. State, 2021 Ind. App. LEXIS 264 (Aug. 24, 2021). Finding that defendant was on federal supervised release was … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Probation / Parole search, Qualified immunity, Standing | Comments Off on ID: Def has burden of proving standing and can’t rely on state seeking to prove he didn’t have standing

CA11: New facts of alleged illegal search already ruled on not appropriate for successor habeas

Defendant’s attempt at a successor habeas on four grounds includes one that there is new evidence that he was wrongfully arrested. That was previously addressed before the new evidence claim, and it’s denied. “ An applicant cannot create a new … Continue reading →

Posted in Issue preclusion, Qualified immunity, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on CA11: New facts of alleged illegal search already ruled on not appropriate for successor habeas

TX9: Court clerk can swear officer for SW application

The affidavit for search warrant does not have to be sworn to before the issuing magistrate under Texas law. A clerk will do. Fender v. State, 2021 Tex. App. LEXIS 6605 (Tex. App. – Beaumont Aug. 9, 2021). No reasonable … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Consent, Probable cause, Qualified immunity, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on TX9: Court clerk can swear officer for SW application

CA7: Without a triggering condition, this was not an anticipatory warrant

Despite defendant’s argument, this was not an anticipatory search warrant. There was no triggering condition, and it was issued with probable cause. United States v. Calligan, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 23402 (7th Cir. Aug. 6, 2021). There clearly was reasonable … Continue reading →

Posted in Anticipatory warrant, Nexus, Qualified immunity, Staleness | Comments Off on CA7: Without a triggering condition, this was not an anticipatory warrant

CO: Consent to officer’s entry extended to her briefly leaving and reentering

Defendant’s consent for an officer to enter extended to her reentry after leaving to retrieve a camera and then returning (even before getting it). People v. Stone, 2021 COA 104, 2021 Colo. App. LEXIS 1089 (Aug. 5, 2021). Even though … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Probation / Parole search, Qualified immunity, Standing | Comments Off on CO: Consent to officer’s entry extended to her briefly leaving and reentering

E.D.Cal.: No REP in a contraband cell phone in prison

Defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in a contraband cell phone found on him in prison. The contents of the phone were used in a drug distribution indictment. The government got a search warrant for the contents of the … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Prison and jail searches, Qualified immunity, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: No REP in a contraband cell phone in prison

UT: Information omitted from SW affidavit added in still shows PC

The omitted information still leaves probable cause. Here, the warrant was for cell tower location information to connect defendant to the burglary of the victims’ house while they slept. State v. Gonzalez, 2021 UT App 83, 2021 Utah App. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on UT: Information omitted from SW affidavit added in still shows PC

CA8: The facts before the officers showed exigency to enter the house on a domestic call

The officers had a reasonable basis for entering defendant’s house without a warrant. “The officers were dispatched to the scene of a domestic disturbance. The first responding officer observed a child in an upstairs window acting excitedly and gesturing at … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA8: The facts before the officers showed exigency to enter the house on a domestic call

CA11: District Court’s § 1983 SJ credibility determinations on PC require reversal

“Because the District Court weighed testimony and made credibility determinations, it erroneously found that Officer Williams had arguable probable cause to detain Ms. Khoury. We must therefore vacate the District Court’s summary judgment order holding that Officer Williams had qualified … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: District Court’s § 1983 SJ credibility determinations on PC require reversal

CA8: Officers had PC to arrest despite later investigation casting doubt and the criminal case getting dismissed

Officers had probable cause for plaintiff’s arrest for a sexual assault charge based on the totality of information, even though charges were later dismissed. Further later investigation cast doubt, but the officers weren’t reckless. Walz v. Randall, 2021 U.S. App. … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA8: Officers had PC to arrest despite later investigation casting doubt and the criminal case getting dismissed

ID: Automobile exception doesn’t apply to purse that used to be in car before PC developed

Defendant’s purse was not in the car at the time probable cause arose for the automobile exception to apply. Therefore, it did not apply to her purse. State v. Maloney, 2021 Ida. LEXIS 117 (June 28, 2021). “It is unnecessary … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on ID: Automobile exception doesn’t apply to purse that used to be in car before PC developed

S.D.Ga.: Attacking dashcam video unavailing where credibility of officer seeing gun wasn’t challenged

“Harris’ objection to the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation that the seizure of the firearm was permissible focuses on whether the submitted video evidence clearly showed that the object in his waistband was a firearm, and whether the officers had sufficient reasonable … Continue reading →

Posted in Qualified immunity, Standards of review | Comments Off on S.D.Ga.: Attacking dashcam video unavailing where credibility of officer seeing gun wasn’t challenged

CA9: Denial of motion to suppress in state court precludes § 1983 case over same search

Defendant lost his motion to suppress in state court over a warrantless entry into his garage. He later sued over the search under § 1983 in federal court. The federal case was precluded by the state denial of the motion … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Issue preclusion, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA9: Denial of motion to suppress in state court precludes § 1983 case over same search

CA9: Suspicionless search of unconscious person in hospital bed violated clearly established law

“Thus, under binding precedent from this court and the Supreme Court, any reasonable officer would have known that Defendants’ suspicionless and warrantless search of Katzenjammer’s body, while she lay unconscious in a hospital bed, violated the Fourth Amendment.” Young v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Pretext, Qualified immunity, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA9: Suspicionless search of unconscious person in hospital bed violated clearly established law

CA6: Social workers subject to 4A, but these get QI

Social workers are subject to the Fourth Amendment. Here, they used a court order to enter plaintiff’s home. The order wasn’t clear on what information that brought it about or that it was particular. Nevertheless, the social workers get qualified … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Ineffective assistance, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA6: Social workers subject to 4A, but these get QI