CA9: Inaccuracies in SW’s place to be searched didn’t misdirect officers; QI applies

The inaccuracies in the search warrant the officer sought weren’t enough to misidentify the place to be searched. Therefore, defendants didn’t violate clearly established law. Hill v. County of Benewah, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 10781 (9th Cir. Apr. 15, 2021).*

The handcuffing of the minor plaintiff objectively was not unreasonable or excessive. M. M. v. County of San Mateo, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 10771 (9th Cir. Apr. 15, 2021).*

Plaintiff’s statute of limitations for false arrest began to run when he was released on bail. Heter v. City of Hutchinson, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 10788 (10th Cir. Apr. 15, 2021).*

Reasonable suspicion is all that’s required for a search of a person on supervised release. United States v. Pope, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 10751 (6th Cir. Apr. 13, 2021).*

This entry was posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Excessive force, Particularity, Probation / Parole search, Qualified immunity. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.