Category Archives: Consent

W.D.N.Y.: The fact the issuing magistrate read fast didn’t mean he wasn’t neutral and detached

The fact the issuing magistrate had to read 65 pages in 21 minutes doesn’t mean he wasn’t neutral and detached. “The Court is not persuaded by Defendant’s assessment of Judge Morrison’s reading speed, which relies wholly on speculation.” United States … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Neutral and detached magistrate, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: The fact the issuing magistrate read fast didn’t mean he wasn’t neutral and detached

D.Alaska: Arriving passenger stopped in airport consented to search

“Here, in contrast, Ms. Spadaro was an arriving passenger; her airplane ticket was a nonissue. There is no indication that law enforcement took her identification from her. And, despite her several requests to use the restroom, the audio recording supports … Continue reading →

Posted in Airport searches, Consent, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Alaska: Arriving passenger stopped in airport consented to search

OR: Def’s wife implicitly consented to the search by her actions

The record supported the finding that defendant’s wife consented to the search. Her behavior, including standing in the open doorway and not protesting the officer’s entry, indicated implied consent. In addition, the court found that he did not expressly deny … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on OR: Def’s wife implicitly consented to the search by her actions

FL5: Weaving justified welfare check stop

Defendant’s obvious weaving justified at least a welfare check stop that was reasonable. State v. Sheldon, 2024 Fla. App. LEXIS 7892 (Fla. 5th DCA Oct. 8, 2024). 2254 petitioner doesn’t show that he didn’t get a full and fair opportunity … Continue reading →

Posted in Community caretaking function, Consent, Issue preclusion, Seizure | Comments Off on FL5: Weaving justified welfare check stop

E.D.Okla.: Housing authority’s warning of a pest inspection permitted under lease agreement amounts to no REP

The housing authority told plaintiff they were coming in for a pest inspection and did under the conditions of the lease. That was reasonable, and there was no violation of a reasonable expectation of privacy when the inspectors saw drugs. … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on E.D.Okla.: Housing authority’s warning of a pest inspection permitted under lease agreement amounts to no REP

AL: Officer being unable to differentiate smell of MJ and hemp doesn’t negate PC

“Because probable cause does not require certainty, but only probability, we agree with the trial court that the fact that officers cannot distinguish between hemp and marijuana based on odor alone ‘does not void probable cause.’ … Other jurisdictions have … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on AL: Officer being unable to differentiate smell of MJ and hemp doesn’t negate PC

OR: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to criminally dangerous person civil commitments

Neither the state nor federal exclusionary rule does not apply in criminal dangerous person civil commitments. State v. T.L.B. (In re T.L.B.), 335 Or. App. 225 (Sep. 25, 2024). The officer here saw defendant walking at night in a neighborhood … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Consent, Exclusionary rule, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OR: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to criminally dangerous person civil commitments

WY: Dog sniff of already parked car didn’t require RS

Defendant left his car at a convenience store’s gas pumps for 30-40 minutes. The police dog sniff while it was parked was not unreasonable. It was not a stop to be extended. Labbe v. State, 2024 WY 99, 2024 Wyo. … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on WY: Dog sniff of already parked car didn’t require RS

FL6: Handicapped parking violation justified stop

Illegally parking [actually standing] in a handicapped spot was an objective basis for defendant’s stop. State v. Diaz, 2024 Fla. App. LEXIS 7143 (Fla. 6th DCA Sep. 13, 2024).* Defendant’s mother’s consent was validly obtained just as a protective sweep … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on FL6: Handicapped parking violation justified stop

M.D.Ala.: Under Evans, DV OP justified stop that led to inventory even though it had unknowingly been set aside

The officer reasonably relied on a report from dispatch that defendant had a DV order of protection against him by his wife. After the stop and the inventory for towing his car, his estranged wife showed up with a copy … Continue reading →

Posted in Border search, Cell phones, Consent, Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception | Comments Off on M.D.Ala.: Under Evans, DV OP justified stop that led to inventory even though it had unknowingly been set aside

D.Kan.: Reinstalling a deleted app to an iPhone to get to def’s account exceeded the scope of consent to search the phone

Defendant consented to a search of his iPhone, but here the officer reinstalled the Telegram app and then used it to search defendant’s Telegram account, finding child porn. All this exceeded his consent. There is no case in point because … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Scope of search, Social media warrants | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Reinstalling a deleted app to an iPhone to get to def’s account exceeded the scope of consent to search the phone

OH10: Mental health facilities are heavily regulated and consent to administrative searches

Residential mental health facilities are heavily regulated and consented to inspections as a condition of licensing. My Friend’s Place in Unity v. Ohio Dep’t of Mental Health, 2024-Ohio-3257, 2024 Ohio App. LEXIS 3067 (10th Dist. Aug. 27, 2024). Plaintiff’s Fourth … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Consent, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on OH10: Mental health facilities are heavily regulated and consent to administrative searches

NE: Despite municipal code requiring refusal of consent, 4A doesn’t require that before SW issues

The Omaha Municipal Code required refusal of consent before an inspection warrant is issued. The officer had probable cause for code violations when he sought the warrant. The warrant will not be suppressed because there is no Fourth Amendment requirement … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Consent | Comments Off on NE: Despite municipal code requiring refusal of consent, 4A doesn’t require that before SW issues

CAAF: Remote erasure of seized cell phone supported tampering conviction

Defendant’s conviction for interfering with a seizure under UCMJ 131e is affirmed. NIS had seized the phone but not yet put it in a Faraday bag to protect it when she remotely erased it. United States v. Strong, 2024 CAAF … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Dog sniff, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on CAAF: Remote erasure of seized cell phone supported tampering conviction

N.D.Ga.: Having cell phone at scene of crime justifies its seizure under plain view

There was justification for the plain view seizure of defendant’s cell phone when it came to the scene of the crime with him. United States v. Dulaney, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 151204 (N.D. Ga. Aug. 23, 2024).* “Saldana-Alaniz fails to … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Cell phones, Consent, Informant hearsay, Search incident | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Having cell phone at scene of crime justifies its seizure under plain view

CA8: PC shown for SW for home in MMJ state on smell of marijuana plus other information

The fact there is medical marijuana in the state did not defeat the probable cause showing because there was also information about alleged sales from the property. Here, the police went to defendant’s home for a knock-and-talk and could smell … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA8: PC shown for SW for home in MMJ state on smell of marijuana plus other information

N.D.Cal.: Seizure or destruction of homeless persons’ unabandoned personal property violated 4A

“This case is similar to Lavan where the Ninth Circuit stated that when the City of Los Angeles destroyed unhoused Plaintiffs’ unabandoned personal possessions left on public sidewalks, those seizures were unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment. 693 F.3d at 1030. … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Consent, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Seizure or destruction of homeless persons’ unabandoned personal property violated 4A

CA5: 4A doesn’t require officer have an arrest warrant in hand or to have even read it

There is no Fourth Amendment requirement that the officer have read or have in hand an arrest warrant. United States v. Moore, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 19668 (5th Cir. Aug. 6, 2024). The officers’ use of force here was reasonable … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Attenuation, Consent, Excessive force | Comments Off on CA5: 4A doesn’t require officer have an arrest warrant in hand or to have even read it

WI: Initial PC and bail determination not critical stage, but if it becomes more, yes

While the probable cause and bail decision itself is not a critical stage, the post-arrest process of determining bail is the critical stage point where the right to counsel attaches. Here, an identification procedure was included. State v. Robinson, 2024 … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Consent, Excessive force | Comments Off on WI: Initial PC and bail determination not critical stage, but if it becomes more, yes

DE: Inevitable discovery can’t be based on speculation

The state’s argument on inevitable discovery is really based on speculation, and that’s not enough. State v. Franks, 2024 Del. Super. LEXIS 561 (Aug. 1, 2024). Plaintiff was arrested for drugs, held five months, then released. “We hold that the … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Consent, Inevitable discovery, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on DE: Inevitable discovery can’t be based on speculation