Category Archives: Protective sweep

NC: Where def drove on grass approaching 4A violating checkpoint, there was RS

Because defendant’s stop at a checkpoint was already with reasonable suspicion, the court does not have to decide on the constitutionality of the roadblock [that appears to have caused it]. State v. Alvarez, 2023 N.C. LEXIS 940 (Dec. 15, 2023). … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Protective sweep, Roadblocks | Comments Off on NC: Where def drove on grass approaching 4A violating checkpoint, there was RS

LA3: Cell phone ping to locate def in a shooting investigation was exigent

“In our view, the trial court did not err in finding that exigent circumstances justified the warrantless procurement of Defendant’s cell-site information. Defendant was attempting to flee from the investigation of this violent crime, [and there was a serious risk … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Cell site location information, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on LA3: Cell phone ping to locate def in a shooting investigation was exigent

WA: Def’s first appearance where bail was set under Gerstein not critical stage requiring counsel because bail could be revisited

Defendant’s first appearance where bail was set under Gerstein was not a critical stage requiring counsel because bail could be revisited. State v. Heng, 2023 Wash. LEXIS 603 (Dec. 7, 2023). “The government contends that [the search] was justified both … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Informant hearsay, Issue preclusion, Protective sweep | Comments Off on WA: Def’s first appearance where bail was set under Gerstein not critical stage requiring counsel because bail could be revisited

N.D.Tex.: Protective sweep of meth lab property was objectively reasonable

The officers’ protective sweep of a property with a working meth lab was objectively reasonable. United States v. Moreno, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 201424 (N.D. Tex. Nov. 9, 2023). Defendant’s cell phone was used during the period the rape victim … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Probation / Parole search, Protective sweep | Comments Off on N.D.Tex.: Protective sweep of meth lab property was objectively reasonable

WV: State did not justify “officer safety” as reason for entry

The state failed to justify the entry here on officer safety grounds because their neighbor disturbance call included no reference to potential violence or threats and no good reason could be articulated other than “officer safety” which essentially is always … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Plain view, feel, smell, Protective sweep, State constitution | Comments Off on WV: State did not justify “officer safety” as reason for entry

S.D.Ohio: Evidence in plain view may be seized during protective sweep

It was permissible for officers to seize firearms seen in plain view during this protective sweep. United States v. Riley, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 198798 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 6, 2023). “Given the totality of the circumstances and the numerous distinctions … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency, Informant hearsay, Protective sweep | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: Evidence in plain view may be seized during protective sweep

W.D.Ky.: Protective sweep unjustified on facts; rural area not enough

The protective sweep here wasn’t justified by any current facts justifying it. The government first relied on it being a rural area, but that’s rejected because it would render most of the country a zone where protective sweeps could always … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Plain view, feel, smell, Protective sweep | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: Protective sweep unjustified on facts; rural area not enough

N.D.Ala.: 4A does not require gun seen in protective sweep be immediately seized; SW was obtained

If officers saw defendant’s .22 during a protective sweep, the Fourth Amendment doesn’t require that it be seized immediately. It can be seized during execution of the later issued search warrant. A .22 is not a weapon of choice for … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Issue preclusion, Plain view, feel, smell, Protective sweep | Comments Off on N.D.Ala.: 4A does not require gun seen in protective sweep be immediately seized; SW was obtained

S.D.Ill.: Justification for a protective sweep remained despite 10 hour wait outside

Despite officers waiting outside for about ten hours and seeing no movement from inside, a protective sweep was still objectively reasonable on the totality. People were unaccounted for, and there was a gun and drugs seen from outside the door. … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Probable cause, Protective sweep, Waiver | Comments Off on S.D.Ill.: Justification for a protective sweep remained despite 10 hour wait outside

E.D.Pa.: Officer’s question about firearms in car made def unreasonably nervous

During a traffic stop, the officer’s question about weapons in the car resulted in defendant’s getting unusually nervous, his breathing completely changing where his chest rose and fell, and he refused to look the officer in the eye. That was … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Probation / Parole search, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Officer’s question about firearms in car made def unreasonably nervous

D.R.I.: Protective sweep unjustified; no reason to believe anyone else was there

Defendant’s premises had been under surveillance for days before the entry and protective sweep. There was no justification for the protective sweep because there was no reason to believe anyone else was there. United States v. Dacruz, 2023 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Independent source, Protective sweep | Comments Off on D.R.I.: Protective sweep unjustified; no reason to believe anyone else was there

GA: Unjustified protective sweep suppressed

The “security sweep” of defendant’s dwelling violated the Fourth Amendment. No justification for the entry and no exigent circumstances were shown. Defendant’s alleged consent came after the unlawful entry. Denial of suppression reversed. Thompson v. State, 2023 Ga. App. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine, Protective sweep | Comments Off on GA: Unjustified protective sweep suppressed

E.D.Wis.: Innocent person whose property was seized can petition in criminal case for return of property

The court finds it has ancillary jurisdiction over a return of property question not directly involved in this case. Petitioner owned it and it was at the place searched and does hold evidence of crime. United States v. Solberg, 2023 … Continue reading →

Posted in Protective sweep, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: Innocent person whose property was seized can petition in criminal case for return of property

OH10: Officer’s lack of knowledge of Covid extension of licenses was not reasonable mistake under Heien

The officer’s mistake of law in not knowing that an executive order that vehicle licenses expiring during Covid March 9, 2020 to December 1, 2020 remained valid was unreasonable under Heien. Heien requires ambiguity, and this wasn’t. Also, an unreasonable … Continue reading →

Posted in Protective sweep, Reasonableness | Comments Off on OH10: Officer’s lack of knowledge of Covid extension of licenses was not reasonable mistake under Heien

CA10 doesn’t have to decide whether furtive movement alone supports vehicle protective sweep

Furtive movements alone may or may not be enough to justify a protective sweep of a car, a question this circuit has never decided. Here, however, there was the additional fact of a “slow roll” to a stop which was … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Excessive force, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion, Staleness | Comments Off on CA10 doesn’t have to decide whether furtive movement alone supports vehicle protective sweep

D.Md.: Surveillance and bodycam video supported officer’s contention def had a firearm in sweatshirt pocket

The court viewed the CCTV and body cam videos (included in the opinion) and it’s apparent defendant had a gun in his sweatshirt pocket. “Not every bulge is a weapon,” but this one apparently was. That justified the frisk. United … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search | Comments Off on D.Md.: Surveillance and bodycam video supported officer’s contention def had a firearm in sweatshirt pocket

NY3: Where no information anyone else could be inside, no justification for protective sweep after def’s arrest

The police had no information even suggesting that another person was in the premises, and a protective sweep after defendant was arrested was unjustified. People v. Hadlock, 2023 NY Slip Op 03819, 2023 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3839 (3d Dept. … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Prison and jail searches, Probable cause, Protective sweep, Strip search | Comments Off on NY3: Where no information anyone else could be inside, no justification for protective sweep after def’s arrest

OH12: Protective sweeps didn’t require consent

The protective sweep didn’t require consent. Moreover, the argument wasn’t preserve below. State v. Mott, 2023-Ohio-2268 (12th Dist. July 3, 2023).* Based on the totality, it was objectively reasonable to believe defendant was speeding when the officer decided to stop … Continue reading →

Posted in Custody, Immigration arrests, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH12: Protective sweeps didn’t require consent

IN: Drug dog’s half sitting alert was still reliable

“In contrast, here the State established that Maverick was a certified drug sniffing dog with a history of reliability. Maverick’s behavior, even without a full final response of sitting, was sufficient to indicate that he had detected the odors of … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Dog sniff, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IN: Drug dog’s half sitting alert was still reliable

NJ: Two-hour delayed SI for forensic evidence on def’s sweatshirt in axe murder case was reasonable

A two-hour delayed search incident of defendant’s sweatshirt for blood and other evidence was reasonable when he was in custody under U.S. v. Edwards (1974, 10 hours) and more compelling probable cause developed he committed an axe murder. Swabbing of … Continue reading →

Posted in Protective sweep, Search incident | Comments Off on NJ: Two-hour delayed SI for forensic evidence on def’s sweatshirt in axe murder case was reasonable