Category Archives: Probable cause

E.D.Mich.: PC to believe a person lives at a particular address can be wrong and still be sufficient

Probable cause to believe a person lives at a particular address can be wrong and still be sufficient. “Vaughn also challenges the sufficiency of the affidavit on the ground that it failed to establish probable cause that he lived at … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: PC to believe a person lives at a particular address can be wrong and still be sufficient

OH1: RS went stale by the time def was seen again days later

There was no reasonable suspicion for defendant’s stop days after he was seen on the street. “Perhaps if the officers had stopped J.T. and his red-sweatshirt-wearing companion nearby the church immediately after the shooting, the totality of the circumstances could … Continue reading →

Posted in Nexus, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Staleness | Comments Off on OH1: RS went stale by the time def was seen again days later

M.D.Fla.: Availability of electronic SW doesn’t modify the automobile exception

The fact an electronic search warrant can more speedily be issued for a vehicle search doesn’t alter the automobile exception. The mere fact a vehicle is mobile is all it takes. United States v. Axon, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134408 … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Availability of electronic SW doesn’t modify the automobile exception

RI: Officer doesn’t need to state a reason for occupants to get out of car under Mimms

Under Mimms, the occupants can be ordered out of the car during a stop. The fact the trial judge disagreed with the three rationales offered for it by the officer doesn’t matter. State v. Li, 2023 R.I. LEXIS 90 (July … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on RI: Officer doesn’t need to state a reason for occupants to get out of car under Mimms

CA6: Arrest paperwork delay here violated Riverside 48 hour rule

Officers’ apparent delays in processing paperwork on an arrest which resulted in plaintiff spending an extra two days in jail without any kind of probable cause finding violated clearly established law. Here, the prosecutor wouldn’t act without their paperwork. “It … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA6: Arrest paperwork delay here violated Riverside 48 hour rule

PA: Officers knocked before entry and defendant acknowledged their presence

Failure to comply with the knock and announce requirement could result in exclusion under state law. Here, however, the trial court’s findings of fact justified dispensing with the knock-and-announce requirement. Officers heard defendant acknowledge their presence, and then they entered … Continue reading →

Posted in Knock and announce, Probable cause, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on PA: Officers knocked before entry and defendant acknowledged their presence

Cal.3: PC to search passenger compartment for gun didn’t extend to the trunk

Officers had probable cause to search defendant’s passenger compartment for a firearm. When the gun wasn’t found there, the officer searched the trunk, finding it. The probable cause, however, did not extend to the trunk. People v. Leal, 2023 Cal. … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search | Comments Off on Cal.3: PC to search passenger compartment for gun didn’t extend to the trunk

N.D.Ohio: Photo of premises in SW showed detached garage, and it was included because on curtilage

The warrant was particular when it showed a picture of the premises with the address. The photograph showed the detached garage on the curtilage. That was covered by the warrant, too. When the government raised standing in response to defendant’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Excessive force, Ineffective assistance, Particularity, Probable cause | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Photo of premises in SW showed detached garage, and it was included because on curtilage

CA5: No REP in a video recorded by another of def committing a crime

While one can have a reasonable expectation of privacy in something he doesn’t own (as in bailment or contract), here it was a video recorded by another of him possessing firearms. He had no reasonable expectation of privacy in the … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Qualified immunity, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA5: No REP in a video recorded by another of def committing a crime

KS: Typo in date of GPS warrant was “technical irregularity” that could be overlooked

A typo in the date on a GPS tracking warrant was a technical irregularity that did not substantively prejudice him. State v. Campbell, 2023 Kan. LEXIS 49 (July 14, 2023). The fact defendant’s statement to the police that formed the … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on KS: Typo in date of GPS warrant was “technical irregularity” that could be overlooked

NY3: Where no information anyone else could be inside, no justification for protective sweep after def’s arrest

The police had no information even suggesting that another person was in the premises, and a protective sweep after defendant was arrested was unjustified. People v. Hadlock, 2023 NY Slip Op 03819, 2023 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3839 (3d Dept. … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Prison and jail searches, Probable cause, Protective sweep, Strip search | Comments Off on NY3: Where no information anyone else could be inside, no justification for protective sweep after def’s arrest

CA8: Even if def’s Mexican confession was obtained by alleged torture, the UN Convention Against Torture doesn’t have a suppression remedy

Defendant was arrested in Mexico and subjected to searches and interrogation which he claimed amounted to torture. Relying on the United Nations Convention Against Torture, he contended it shocked the conscience. There is no authority for the CAT to apply … Continue reading →

Posted in Due process, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA8: Even if def’s Mexican confession was obtained by alleged torture, the UN Convention Against Torture doesn’t have a suppression remedy

DE: Where SW was for clothing worn in shooting, nexus shown to def’s home

Where the search warrant sought clothing worn during a shooting, nexus was shown to where defendant lived. State v. Johnson, 2023 Del. Super. LEXIS 324 (July 7, 2023). There was probable cause for plaintiff’s arrest for harassment of another person. … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Nexus, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on DE: Where SW was for clothing worn in shooting, nexus shown to def’s home

NY Queens: Conflict of laws: Federal SW led to state court prosecution, and it is reviewed under state law

The warrant was issued by a U.S. Magistrate Judge, but it is reviewed under New York law which retained Aguilar/Spinelli, and it meets the test. People v. Mercado, 2023 NY Slip Op 23195, 2023 NYLJ LEXIS 1655, 2023 N.Y. Misc. … Continue reading →

Posted in Conflict of laws, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Standing, Waiver | Comments Off on NY Queens: Conflict of laws: Federal SW led to state court prosecution, and it is reviewed under state law

Cal.2: Geofence warrant issued before any case law showed PC, particularly, and good faith

Geofence warrant issued in 2019 before there were any reported cases satisfied probable cause, particularity, and the good faith exception. Price v. Superior Court, 2023 Cal. App. LEXIS 505 (2d Dist. July 3, 2023):

Posted in geofence, Good faith exception, Particularity, Probable cause | Comments Off on Cal.2: Geofence warrant issued before any case law showed PC, particularly, and good faith

TX1: 911 call about a suspected kidnapping led to a stop found valid under Naverette

A 911 call about a suspected kidnapping led to a stop found valid under Naverette. Small v. State, 2023 Tex. App. LEXIS 4610 (Tex. App. – Houston (1st Dist.) June 29, 2023)* (unpublished) “These events establish probable cause, especially when … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Inventory, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on TX1: 911 call about a suspected kidnapping led to a stop found valid under Naverette

MO: Virginia v. Moore does not require officer see the crime to have PC for arrest outside jurisdiction

Virginia v. Moore does not require that an arresting officer personally have seen the act that led to the arrest outside the officer’s jurisdiction as long as there was probable cause. State v. Barton, 2023 Mo. LEXIS 183 (June 27, … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Excessive force, Probable cause, Reasonableness, Staleness | Comments Off on MO: Virginia v. Moore does not require officer see the crime to have PC for arrest outside jurisdiction

D.Vt.: Hiding a fanny pack in a trash can from the police was abandonment without evidence of intent to recover it

Defendant put a fanny pack in a trash can when the police were around. Without evidence he intended to retrieve it, it is treated as abandoned property that he has no standing in. United States v. Moffitt, 2023 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Probable cause, Waiver | Comments Off on D.Vt.: Hiding a fanny pack in a trash can from the police was abandonment without evidence of intent to recover it

NJ: Smell of mj in the passenger compartment doesn’t justify search of trunk or engine compartment

Where the officer smelled marijuana in the passenger compartment and searched for it finding nothing, a search of the engine compartment and trunk was excessive under the automobile exception. From the syllabus : “Expanding the search to the engine compartment … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Scope of search | Comments Off on NJ: Smell of mj in the passenger compartment doesn’t justify search of trunk or engine compartment

D.Mont.: § 1983 that Montana SWs can’t be executed on tribal lands barred by Younger

Plaintiff in Lewis & Clark County Jail sues under § 1983 that Montana search warrants can’t be executed on tribal lands. This claim is barred by Younger. Adams v. Baker, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107569 (D. Mont. June 21, 2023).* … Continue reading →

Posted in Abstention, Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Standing | Comments Off on D.Mont.: § 1983 that Montana SWs can’t be executed on tribal lands barred by Younger