Category Archives: Warrant papers

DE: The PC for cell phone was limited to search history; SW otherwise overbroad

Defendant was accused of sexual contact with a four-year-old girl he was caring for. Her mother kicked him out of the house and sought a forensic exam of the child. A couple of days later, she found his cell phone … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Prison and jail searches, Warrant papers | Comments Off on DE: The PC for cell phone was limited to search history; SW otherwise overbroad

W.D.Ky.: Boilerplate in affidavit doesn’t matter if the critical facts show PC

Boilerplate information in the affidavit for warrant doesn’t matter as long as the critical facts show probable cause, and here they did. There were five facts supporting probable cause. United States v. Morton, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7580 (W.D. Ky. … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Neutral and detached magistrate, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Warrant papers | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: Boilerplate in affidavit doesn’t matter if the critical facts show PC

SD: Failure to put SW materials in record means trial court presumed correct

There were two search warrants for location data and defendant’s cell phone. Without the search warrant materials in the appellate record, there’s nothing to review and the trial court is assumed to be correct. State v. Horse, 2024 S.D. 4, … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine, Warrant papers | Comments Off on SD: Failure to put SW materials in record means trial court presumed correct

MS: One of two SWs for def’s business was accidentally destroyed but not in bad faith; officers getting second SW were justified

Here there were two search warrants: One for suite E and another for both suites D & E to be sure they were searching the right premises. Execution of the suite E warrant led officers to get another for both. … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonableness, Warrant execution, Warrant papers | Comments Off on MS: One of two SWs for def’s business was accidentally destroyed but not in bad faith; officers getting second SW were justified

S.D.N.Y.: Policy directive for criminal court appearance strip searches presumptively public and not sealed

This is litigation over strip searches of detainees coming into the Manhattan Criminal Court building for court. A policy directive from another case litigated in 2018 is pertinent. The presumption of access to public records applies, and the directive will … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Warrant papers | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Policy directive for criminal court appearance strip searches presumptively public and not sealed

S.D.N.Y.: Former President’s name in SW materials for Parnas and Giuliani disclosed because it came up in an impeachment

In Lev Parnas’s case, the search papers are partially unsealed as to former President Trump’s name but kept under seal as to others. He is a public figure, and the others are not. As to Trump, most of this came … Continue reading →

Posted in Due process, Good faith exception, Reasonableness, Warrant papers | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Former President’s name in SW materials for Parnas and Giuliani disclosed because it came up in an impeachment

E.D.Mo.: Inventory of car totaled in flight from police was reasonable on totality

The inventory of defendant’s car after he totaled it fleeing from the police in a wreck was reasonable on the totality. Defendant argued that inventory was improper just from curiosity. United States v. Twiggs, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 204654 (E.D. … Continue reading →

Posted in Body searches, Immigration arrests, Inventory, Warrant papers | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Inventory of car totaled in flight from police was reasonable on totality

CA4: Clerk’s failure to file and stamp warrants not a 4A violation

The alleged failure of the clerk of court to file and stamp warrants was not a Fourth Amendment claim for a § 1983 case. Jordan v. Newman, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 29766 (4th Cir. Nov. 8, 2023). The taking of … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant papers | Comments Off on CA4: Clerk’s failure to file and stamp warrants not a 4A violation

S.D.N.Y.: SW affidavit not yet available to def merely for bail application

Defendant doesn’t get to see the affidavit for warrant yet just for his bail application because the government asserts the investigation is still ongoing. Discovery of child pornography was inadvertent, and the bail application isn’t a discovery device. The question … Continue reading →

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Warrant papers | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: SW affidavit not yet available to def merely for bail application

CA6: State issuing magistrate’s failure to transcribe supplemental information for PC was not enough to suppress

The affidavit and supplementing testimony provided substantial probable cause for issuance of the warrant. State law requires any testimony supplementing a search warrant affidavit be preserved and transcribed. The state issuing magistrate failed. The officer, however, acted in good faith, … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Immigration arrests, Neutral and detached magistrate, Qualified immunity, Warrant papers | Comments Off on CA6: State issuing magistrate’s failure to transcribe supplemental information for PC was not enough to suppress

S.D.N.Y.: Arrested target of cell phone SW has common law right of access to affidavit and SW

The target’s motion to unseal the search warrant affidavit for his cell phone is granted. There is a common law right of access, and the First Amendment right of access does not even have to be decided. The government’s only … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory, Issue preclusion, Plain view, feel, smell, Warrant papers | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Arrested target of cell phone SW has common law right of access to affidavit and SW

W.D.La.: Failure to make a timely return of SW papers is not a const’l error

Failure to make a timely return of the warrant to the issuing court is not a constitutional error, and there is no showing of prejudice. United States v. Warren, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 176014 (W.D. La. Aug. 18, 2023), adopted, … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity, Warrant papers | Comments Off on W.D.La.: Failure to make a timely return of SW papers is not a const’l error

S.D.Tex.: Court declines to unseal warrant papers yet; redaction not feasible

The search warrant papers involving search of property of a U.S. Representative are not unsealed yet. The redactions were nearly everywhere and it would not make sense. The interests in temporary nondisclosure are more important here; the government has made … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Pretext, Warrant papers | Comments Off on S.D.Tex.: Court declines to unseal warrant papers yet; redaction not feasible

E.D.Pa.: Ongoing investigation bars access to warrant papers for time being

The target of a search warrant can’t yet get access to the affidavit in support because the case is still under investigation and there is a potential of exposing grand jury witnesses. In re Search Warrants Issued November 30, 2022, … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Informant hearsay, Qualified immunity, Warrant papers | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Ongoing investigation bars access to warrant papers for time being

D.S.D. & OH5: When challenging another court’s SW, it has to be filed with the papers for the court to rule

Defendant challenges the tribal search warrant as lacking probable cause and being vindictively obtained, the latter of which does not exist under Rule 41. He fails to include the warrant papers so the court can’t rule. United States v. Floyd, … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Consent, Excessive force, Warrant papers | Comments Off on D.S.D. & OH5: When challenging another court’s SW, it has to be filed with the papers for the court to rule

E.D.La.: Leaving the wrong SW at the scene of the search is not a ground to suppress

Leaving the wrong search warrant at the scene of the search is not a ground to suppress. United States v. Major, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 116569 (E.D. La. July 7, 2023). The CI had no track record, but his story … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution, Warrant papers | Comments Off on E.D.La.: Leaving the wrong SW at the scene of the search is not a ground to suppress

E.D.Mich.: Failure to file SW return doesn’t require suppression

Failure to file the warrant return doesn’t require suppression. It’s a curable ministerial act. Besides, the defendant can’t show prejudice. As to the merits, the search warrant was issued with probable cause and the good faith exception applies in any … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Plain view, feel, smell, Staleness, Warrant papers | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Failure to file SW return doesn’t require suppression

FL1: If trial court refuses to unseal SW affidavit, in camera review must be sought to preserve issue

Defendant sought unsealing of the search warrant affidavit which the state successfully resisted on the ground of informant privilege in other ongoing investigations. The defense never sought in camera review. Without that, the issue was unpreserved for appellate review. Leverette … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Informant hearsay, State constitution, Warrant papers | Comments Off on FL1: If trial court refuses to unseal SW affidavit, in camera review must be sought to preserve issue

S.D.W.Va.: No 4A right to leaving SW at scene of search

Searching officers do not violate the Fourth Amendment by not leaving a copy of the search warrant, let alone the original. Carter v. Luciano, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 101723 (S.D. W. Va. June 12, 2023).* The search warrant was based … Continue reading →

Posted in Body searches, Exclusionary rule, Prison and jail searches, Warrant papers | Comments Off on S.D.W.Va.: No 4A right to leaving SW at scene of search

TX9: Affidavit for a SW is a public record

The affidavit for a search warrant is a public record. $49,815.00 in United States Currency v. State, 2023 Tex. App. LEXIS 3775 (Tex. App. – Beaumont June 1, 2023). Defendant did not “distance himself” from the bags in the car … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Standing, Warrant papers | Comments Off on TX9: Affidavit for a SW is a public record