S.D.N.Y.: Former President’s name in SW materials for Parnas and Giuliani disclosed because it came up in an impeachment

In Lev Parnas’s case, the search papers are partially unsealed as to former President Trump’s name but kept under seal as to others. He is a public figure, and the others are not. As to Trump, most of this came out in one of the impeachment trials, so it’s hardly a secret anymore. United States v. Parnas, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 220837 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 12, 2023); In re Search Warrants Dated April 21 & April 28, 2021, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 221162 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 12, 2023).

A violation of the Vienna Convention has no private right of action. Forcibly removing the defendant from one country to another was not outrageous conduct under United States v. Alvarez-Machain (1992) and Rochin (1952). United States v. Ramic, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 220740 (W.D. Ky. Dec. 5, 2023).

The court talks about the probable cause while only deciding the good faith exception that the showing was not so bad it couldn’t be relied on by officers. United States v. Schmitz, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 220530 (S.D. Fla. Dec. 4, 2023).*

There is no Fourth Amendment due process right. That’s in the Fourteenth Amendment for the states and the Fifth Amendment for the federal government. Pitts v. Roberts, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 220705 (E.D. Wis. Dec. 12, 2023).*

This entry was posted in Due process, Good faith exception, Reasonableness, Warrant papers. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.