Author Archives: Hall

TX upholds geofence warrant

Wells v. State, 2025 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 210 (Apr. 2, 2025) (6-3) [somehow what we’ve come to expect from Texas]:

Posted in geofence | Comments Off on TX upholds geofence warrant

CA9: Arrest of def’s drug runners was exigency for entry into his hotel room

The arrest of defendant’s drug runners was exigency for entry into his hotel room. United States v. Biggs, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 7696 (9th Cir. Apr. 2, 2025). The trial court erred in holding that defendant’s father who owned the … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on CA9: Arrest of def’s drug runners was exigency for entry into his hotel room

CNS: ACLU urges 2nd Circuit to rethink no-warrant cellphone searches at US border

Courthouse News Service: ACLU urges 2nd Circuit to rethink no-warrant cellphone searches at US border by Erik Uebelacker (“A Fourth Amendment carveout that gives U.S. Border Patrol agents the right to conduct warrantless searches shouldn’t apply to cellphones and laptops, … Continue reading

Posted in Border search, Cell phones | Comments Off on CNS: ACLU urges 2nd Circuit to rethink no-warrant cellphone searches at US border

CA3: Def’s being a manager of premises gave RS as to him under PA law

Defendant’s status as the manager of a lounge gave reasonable suspicion to detain him under Pennsylvania law for what was going on inside. United States v. Burgess, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 7359 (3d Cir. Mar. 31, 2025). Plaintiff’s civil Franks … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA3: Def’s being a manager of premises gave RS as to him under PA law

OH4: Arrest on recalled warrant still valid under GFE

The warrants database showed a warrant for defendant, but it actually had been recalled. The officer checked dispatch who told him of the warrant, although defendant denied there was one, but he had a motive to lie to avoid arrest. … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Good faith exception, Probable cause, Search incident | Comments Off on OH4: Arrest on recalled warrant still valid under GFE

IL: Mere possession of a firearm not RS of illegal possession

The fact a person “might have a firearm but not a CCL” isn’t reasonable suspicion. Otherwise, all of them are subject to a stop and frisk. People v. Dorsey, 2025 IL App (1st) 240933, 2025 Ill. App. LEXIS 624 (Mar. … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IL: Mere possession of a firearm not RS of illegal possession

NJ recognizes right to advice of counsel before request for consent

The right to advice of counsel under the Fifth Amendment has to be read together with the Fourth Amendment and a request for consent. Other states do not, but New Jersey does. Defendant was asked for consent inside his own … Continue reading

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on NJ recognizes right to advice of counsel before request for consent

FDNV: Primer on Persistent Surveillance

Federal Defender of Nevada: Primer on Persistent Surveillance (Mar. 28, 2025):

Posted in Surveillance technology, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on FDNV: Primer on Persistent Surveillance

IN: State’s reliance on GFE not waived where it didn’t argue it but trial court decided it

“The totality of the evidence before the issuing judge was sufficient to establish probable cause. Detective Salley’s affidavit in support of the search warrant had outlined observations that law enforcement had made during surveillance of the Astro Drive Residence, which, … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on IN: State’s reliance on GFE not waived where it didn’t argue it but trial court decided it

SD: Questions about carrying drugs without RS extended the stop in violation of Rodriquez

Questions about drugs during a traffic stop asked without reasonable suspicion extended the stop and made it unreasonable. State v. Holy, 2025 S.D. 19 (Mar. 26, 2025):

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on SD: Questions about carrying drugs without RS extended the stop in violation of Rodriquez

MD: When asked if def “minded” to consent to a frisk, he consented

Defendant was stopped for a traffic offense, and the officer asked about whether he was armed and whether he “minded” to consent to a frisk. He argued that he had no choice but to answer, but he did have a … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Consent, Curtilage, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on MD: When asked if def “minded” to consent to a frisk, he consented

WSJ: The Five Things You Shouldn’t Tell ChatGPT

WSJ: The Five Things You Shouldn’t Tell ChatGPT by Nicole Nguyen (“Don’t let your mystery rash become AI training fodder—or turn up in a data breach”) Or a government subpoena or search warrant.

Posted in Computer and cloud searches | Comments Off on WSJ: The Five Things You Shouldn’t Tell ChatGPT

D.Kan.: Marion County Record retaliatory newspaper search case

In the Marion County Record case, the now infamous case of a search warrant for a newspaper’s servers and all electronic devices based on a First Amendment retaliation claim, the main Fourth Amendment claim survives the motions to dismiss. The … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Overbreadth, Overseizure | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Marion County Record retaliatory newspaper search case

C.D.Cal.: Suit over NYC DA’s subpoena for possession of a stolen antiquity is dismissed

The defendant here is Alvin Bragg, the District Attorney of New York County, NY (Manhattan). He’s sued in the Central District of California over his office’s investigation into antiquity art theft where plaintiff purchased a statue, the Bronze Male, for … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Due process, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on C.D.Cal.: Suit over NYC DA’s subpoena for possession of a stolen antiquity is dismissed

E.D.Ky.: SW affidavit failed to show PC for search of house, but it wasn’t so lacking the GFE doesn’t apply

The affidavit for search warrant here was based on suspicious circumstances but doesn’t show nexus to defendant’s house that he was engaging in drug trafficking from there just from living there. “Ultimately, the evidence in the affidavit did not create … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Good faith exception, Reasonableness, Waiver | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: SW affidavit failed to show PC for search of house, but it wasn’t so lacking the GFE doesn’t apply

W.D.La.: Request for consent during stop came after RS developed

Defendant’s traffic stop was reasonable because of a cracked windshield on his truck, and a question about consent to search near the end of the ticket writing process didn’t unlawfully extend it. United States v. Calderon, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.La.: Request for consent during stop came after RS developed

LATimes: ‘People should be worried’: 23andMe bankruptcy could expose customers’ genetic data

LATimes: ‘People should be worried’: 23andMe bankruptcy could expose customers’ genetic data by Caroline Petrow-Cohen and Stacy Perman (“Once a promising company briefly valued at $6 billion, 23andMe popularized at-home DNA test kits and spawned a cottage industry of ancestry … Continue reading

Posted in DNA | Comments Off on LATimes: ‘People should be worried’: 23andMe bankruptcy could expose customers’ genetic data

OH2: Officer could pursue across jurisdictional lines

The officer had territorial jurisdiction to stop and arrest defendant after he fled across jurisdictional lines. The officer was in hot pursuit. Also, a motion to dismiss isn’t the remedy. State v. Letts, 2025-Ohio-1085, 2025 Ohio App. LEXIS 1033 (2d … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on OH2: Officer could pursue across jurisdictional lines

Cal.1st: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to DL suspensions

The exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to DL suspension proceedings. Kazelka v. Cal. Dep’t of Motor Vehicles, 2025 Cal. App. LEXIS 196 (1st Dist. Mar. 27, 2025). Officers responded to a shots fired call in a Bronx apartment and entered and … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Probable cause, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on Cal.1st: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to DL suspensions

CA6: By testifying at trial searches were based on false evidence, def violated proffer agreement; govt should have objected, not violated it, too

Defendant’s trial testimony about his searches being based on falsities violated his proffer agreement, but, rather than objecting, the government’s putting in more evidence violated it, too. (But harmless error.) United States v. Grogan, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 7094 (6th … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence | Comments Off on CA6: By testifying at trial searches were based on false evidence, def violated proffer agreement; govt should have objected, not violated it, too