Author Archives: Hall

S.D.Ohio: Drug dog sticking head partially into open door area was at least with reasonable suspicion

“[W]here a dog only partially and briefly pokes their head into the interior of a vehicle, as Cody did here, such does not constitute a search. Fellmy, 165 F.4th at 506 (citing Caballes, 543 U.S. at 408-09) (finding a dog … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: Drug dog sticking head partially into open door area was at least with reasonable suspicion

D.Me.: Failure of drug dog to alert is a factor in totality

The failure of the drug dog to alert doesn’t completely undermine probable case, but it is a factor in the totality of circumstances. Here, the government didn’t meet its burden. United States v. Presby, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 172828 (D. … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Me.: Failure of drug dog to alert is a factor in totality

M.D.Fla.: Package covered by anticipatory warrant was moved to another house, and exigency permitted warrantless entry to seize

In this anticipatory warrant case, the package was delivered to the target residence but then moved to another residence. That created exigent circumstances for entry without a warrant. Officers also did a protective sweep and retreated to get a search … Continue reading

Posted in Anticipatory warrant, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Package covered by anticipatory warrant was moved to another house, and exigency permitted warrantless entry to seize

E.D.N.Y.: SW request to search cell phone seized two months earlier was unreasonable

“The government seeks a warrant to search two cellular phones that have been in its possession for more than two months since the time to execute a prior search warrant lapsed. In United States v. Smith, 967 F.3d 198 (2d … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Reasonableness, Seizure | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: SW request to search cell phone seized two months earlier was unreasonable

IN Tax: 4A claim over order to enter for tax assessment moot where it didn’t happen

There was an order to enter the taxpayer’s property for an assessment; however, the entry never occurred, so the Fourth Amendment issue is moot. Bolte v. Dubois Cty. Assessor, 2026 Ind. Tax LEXIS 35 (T.C. Aug. 3, 2026). “The record … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Mootness, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IN Tax: 4A claim over order to enter for tax assessment moot where it didn’t happen

Reason: Kansas Lawsuit: ALPRs Turn a License Plate Into the ‘Functional Equivalent’ of a ‘GPS Tracking Device’

Reason: Kansas Lawsuit: ALPRs Turn a License Plate Into the ‘Functional Equivalent’ of a ‘GPS Tracking Device’ by Jacob Sullum (“The Kansas Justice Institute argues that Wichita’s ‘warrantless ALPR dragnet surveillance program’ violates the state constitution’s privacy protections.”).

Posted in Automatic license plate readers | Comments Off on Reason: Kansas Lawsuit: ALPRs Turn a License Plate Into the ‘Functional Equivalent’ of a ‘GPS Tracking Device’

MI: Suppression hearing is a critical stage of the proceedings

A suppression hearing is a critical stage of the proceedings, and defendant was unrepresented at that point due to disagreements with first retained and then appointed counsel. Remanded. The pretrial motions in general were disorganized, and the Fourth Amendment claim … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Privileges, Qualified immunity, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on MI: Suppression hearing is a critical stage of the proceedings

S.D.W.Va.: Admission to a little marijuana in backpack didn’t justify search of her car trunk

Defendant’s admission to the officers she had a little marijuana in her backpack didn’t justify a search of the trunk. United States v. Bowling, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 169576 (S.D. W. Va. July 30, 2026). Plaintiff’s § 1983 false arrest … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Burden of pleading, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.W.Va.: Admission to a little marijuana in backpack didn’t justify search of her car trunk

CA7: Controlled buy justified stop, dog sniff, and search

The controlled buy off defendant gave probable cause to search his car after he left it, irrespective of an alleged pretextual traffic stop and use of a drug dog. United States v. Randle, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 22657 (7th Cir. … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Automobile exception, Dog sniff, Issue preclusion, Privileges, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA7: Controlled buy justified stop, dog sniff, and search

WaPo: How rogue officers turned a nationwide camera network into a tool for stalking

WaPo: How rogue officers turned a nationwide camera network into a tool for stalking by Drew Harwell, Douglas MacMillan and Aaron Schaffer (“Flock’s array of license-plate cameras was built to fight crime. But at least 50 law enforcement officers were … Continue reading

Posted in Automatic license plate readers | Comments Off on WaPo: How rogue officers turned a nationwide camera network into a tool for stalking

Cal.1: Search condition for mental health diversion was within court’s discretion

The trial court acted within its statutory discretion imposing a search condition on defendant during his mental health diversion. His criminal history justified it. Thompson v. Superior Court, 2026 Cal. App. LEXIS 459 (1st Dist. July 30, 2026). One defendant … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Probation / Parole search, Standing | Comments Off on Cal.1: Search condition for mental health diversion was within court’s discretion

OH1: Even with MJ use being legal, driving under influence isn’t

While small amounts of marijuana are legal in Ohio, driving under the influence is not, so the smell of burnt marijuana in a vehicle is probable cause. Also, a blunt was seen in the ashtray. State v. Sawyer, 2026-Ohio-2913 (1st … Continue reading

Posted in DNA, Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on OH1: Even with MJ use being legal, driving under influence isn’t

N.D.N.Y.: Confrontation clause doesn’t apply in suppression hearings

Hearsay may be relied upon in a suppression hearing, and the confrontation clause doesn’t apply. United States v. Albert, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 168169 (N.D.N.Y. July 29, 2026):

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Informant hearsay, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on N.D.N.Y.: Confrontation clause doesn’t apply in suppression hearings

OR: Third-party doctrine doesn’t apply to data a computer user stores in the cloud

The third-party doctrine doesn’t apply to data a computer user stores in the cloud. State v. Klaus, 351 Or. App. 738 (July 29, 2026) (Oregon’s decision page currently unavailable):

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on OR: Third-party doctrine doesn’t apply to data a computer user stores in the cloud

Yahoo Tech: Can you be prosecuted for wiping your phone at the border?

Yahoo Tech: Can you be prosecuted for wiping your phone at the border? by Dan Thorp-Lancaster(“An activist is being prosecuted for activating a “duress code” that wiped his phone during an airport interrogation. Here’s what you need to know.”)

Posted in Border search | Comments Off on Yahoo Tech: Can you be prosecuted for wiping your phone at the border?

LATimes: Immigration agents used racial slurs referring to Latinos in text messages, video obtained by ACLU

LATimes: Immigration agents used racial slurs referring to Latinos in text messages, video obtained by ACLU by Brittny Mejia (immigration stops are seemingly based on racial profiling).

Posted in Racial profiling | Comments Off on LATimes: Immigration agents used racial slurs referring to Latinos in text messages, video obtained by ACLU

Cal.4: No error not unsealing CI’s identity in SW application

The trial court didn’t err in refusing to unseal part of the search warrant affidavit that disclosed the identity of the CI because the state informer privilege applied. The sealing issue still gets reviewed on appeal where the court of … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonableness, Search incident, Seizure, Warrant papers | Comments Off on Cal.4: No error not unsealing CI’s identity in SW application

D.P.R.: A shed on the curtilage was within scope of SW

It was reasonable for officers to search a shed on the curtilage; it was within the scope of the search warrant. United States v. Torres-Benitez, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 165162 (D.P.R. July 24, 2026). The CI said he could get … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Drug or alcohol testing, Probable cause, Scope of search | Comments Off on D.P.R.: A shed on the curtilage was within scope of SW

NY4: Payton does not apply to an arrest in a common area of an apartment building

Payton v. New York does not apply to an arrest in a common area of an apartment building. People v. Kadenhead, 2026 NY Slip Op 04680 (4th Dept. July 24, 2026). There was probable cause for defendant’s arrest on a … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Informant hearsay, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NY4: Payton does not apply to an arrest in a common area of an apartment building

FL5: State failed to show justification for delay for dog sniff

This being a warrantless search during a traffic stop with a drug dog, the state bore the burden of proof on justification for detention for the dog sniff, and it failed to show that the stop was lawfully continued. Reversed. … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Cell phones, Dog sniff, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause | Comments Off on FL5: State failed to show justification for delay for dog sniff