N.D.Cal.: 17 day delay in SW for firearm involved in alleged shooting isn’t stale

A search warrant based on a shooting 17 days earlier for the firearm wasn’t stale, and it was based on probable cause, despite a Franks challenge on part of it. United States v. Sembrano, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 211699 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 12, 2020):

Continue reading →
Posted in Staleness | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: 17 day delay in SW for firearm involved in alleged shooting isn’t stale

D.N.M.: Def’s subjective expectation of privacy in Chatstep isn’t enough for a REP

Defendant’s subjective expectation that communications on Chatstep were private isn’t enough for a reasonable expectation of privacy. United States v. Rosenschein, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 211433 (D.N.M. Nov. 12, 2020):

Continue reading →
Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Def’s subjective expectation of privacy in Chatstep isn’t enough for a REP

CA6: Police called to ER for shooting victim can make plain view

When the police are called to the ER for a shooting victim, the bloody clothes can be in plain view. United States v. Clancy, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 35567 (6th Cir. Nov. 12, 2020):

Continue reading →
Posted in Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on CA6: Police called to ER for shooting victim can make plain view

NY2: Failure to call officer involved at suppression hearing was waiver here

Defendant’s claim of his statement being in violation of the Fourth Amendment isn’t preserved for appeal by lack of testimony of the officer involved. People v. Molina, 2020 NY Slip Op 06553. 2020 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6651 (2d Dept. Nov. 12, 2020).

Defendant’s efforts at post-conviction discovery of search warrant materials involving another person fail. It is all hearsay and shows nothing material to his murder conviction. Commonwealth v. Moffat, 2020 Mass. LEXIS 725 (Nov. 12, 2020).

Reasonable suspicion here was based on collective knowledge. There is no requirement of actual knowledge. United States v. Willis, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 211114 (W.D. La. Sept. 21, 2020).*

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Suppression hearings, Waiver | Comments Off on NY2: Failure to call officer involved at suppression hearing was waiver here

CA5: No standing or REP in the CSLI of another

Defendant didn’t have a reasonable expectation of privacy (standing) in the movements of a cell phone of another. Still, it was with a warrant, and there is no defect in the warrant process. United States v. Beaudion, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 35523 (5th Cir. Nov. 11, 2020). The court also gives an interesting brief history of the Fourth Amendment:

Continue reading →
Posted in Cell site location information, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on CA5: No standing or REP in the CSLI of another

N.D.Cal.: Failure to mention denial of a TRO in civil litigation over similar issue material enough to get Franks hearing

The fact a TRO had been denied in a civil case involving some of the same facts was potentially material under Franks, and he gets a Franks hearing. Also, defendants have no standing in the search of a co-conspirator’s home. United States v. Chen, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 210476 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 10, 2020).

Defendant asserts his Fourth Amendment claim again in his 2254 habeas petition, and it’s barred under Stone v. Powell. [Essentially, this is just an effort to relitigate.] Hammond v. Gastelo, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 210444 (S.D. Cal. Nov. 10, 2020).*

Defendant pled guilty but now claims that defense counsel didn’t properly advise him about potential Fourth Amendment claims. The plea was still voluntary and waives his Fourth Amendment claims. State v. Perez, 2020 Del. Super. LEXIS 2881 (Nov. 2, 2020).

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Failure to mention denial of a TRO in civil litigation over similar issue material enough to get Franks hearing

W.D.N.Y.: Likelihood of suppression isn’t a factor at detention hearing

Defendant’s assertion at a detention hearing that there is some “likelihood” he may win suppression of evidence isn’t a factor in the decision to release. He’s still entitled to the presumption of innocence, but, essentially, exclusion isn’t ever likely enough to factor in to the release decision. United States v. Cordero, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 210399 (W.D. N.Y. Nov. 10, 2020):

Continue reading →
Posted in Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: Likelihood of suppression isn’t a factor at detention hearing

Filter: DEA Pursues Vast Expansion of Patient Surveillance

Filter: DEA Pursues Vast Expansion of Patient Surveillance by Sessi Kuwabara Blanchard (“The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) is looking to expand its anti-diversion surveillance infrastructure by being able to search and analyze myriad patient behaviors for the vast majority of controlled and scheduled drug prescriptions—all accompanied by a rapid process for legally unveiling personally identifying information. In early September, the agency requested proposals for the creation of software capable of searching at least 85 percent of all US residents’ controlled-substance prescriptions for certain patient behaviors, as well as prescriber and pharmacist practices.”)

Posted in Surveillance technology, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on Filter: DEA Pursues Vast Expansion of Patient Surveillance

D.C.Cir.: IAC claim presented first in court of appeals decided without remand; claim fails on its face

Defendant raised his ineffective assistance claim first in the Court of Appeals. Usually, the court says it would remand for an evidentiary hearing. Here, however, his allegation is facially insufficient and the issue is decided without a remand. The challenge is to the failure to attack probable cause, but probable cause is shown. United States v. Boone, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 35464 (D.C. Cir. Nov. 10, 2020).

It was reasonable for the officer to believe defendant abandoned the bag he had. Defendant quibbles over which bag, but the officer asked about “any” bag. United States v. Zepeda, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 210148 (D.N.M. Nov. 10, 2020).*

It was reasonable for the officer here to believe that drug evidence would be found in defendant’s car because the officer had just witnessed what he believed was a drug transaction. It was reasonable under the search incident or automobile exception. United States v. Thompson, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 210119 (D. Del. Nov. 10, 2020).*

Posted in Abandonment, Automobile exception, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on D.C.Cir.: IAC claim presented first in court of appeals decided without remand; claim fails on its face

E.D.Pa.: Prior flight from an officer adds nothing to RS calculus

Prior flight from an officer adds nothing to the reasonable suspicion calculus, but the remainder here does. United States v. Foushee, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 209986 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 10, 2020):

Continue reading →
Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Prior flight from an officer adds nothing to RS calculus

TX13: Legibility of issuing magistrate’s signature on SW is subject to GFE

The legibility of the signature of the issuing magistrate for a search warrant is an issue subject to the good faith exception. This court first held the illegibility was reason to suppress, but the Court of Criminal Appeals reversed. State v. Arellano, 571 S.W.3d 422 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi—Edinburg 2019), rev’d, 600 S.W.3d 53 (Tex. Crim. App. 2020). On remand, the good faith exception applies. State v. Arellano, 2020 Tex. App. LEXIS 8717 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi—Edinburg Nov. 5, 2020). (After all, some signatures are completely illegible, so why should that matter if it’s typed below? Also, illegibility can be completely subjective.)

“‘[T]he Fourth Amendment requires only that the police reasonably believe the search to be consensual.’ DaCruz-Mendes, 970 F.3d at 909 (quoting United States v. Garcia, 197 F.3d 1223, 1227 (8th Cir. 1999)). [¶] The undersigned magistrate judge finds that, considering the totality of the circumstances, a reasonable officer in Trooper Foster’s position would believe Defendant voluntarily consented to the search of the Hyundai.” United States v. Morales, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 209932 (D. Neb. Oct. 26, 2020).*

Posted in Consent, Good faith exception, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on TX13: Legibility of issuing magistrate’s signature on SW is subject to GFE

NJ: Occupants of car leaving area of a robbery not responding to light in the eyes as it passed by is not RS

The officer on his way to a robbery call used the spotlight on his patrol car to illuminate the interior of cars passing by him in the other lane. When the occupants of defendant’s car didn’t respond the same as others, he stopped them. That wasn’t reasonable suspicion. State v. Nyema, 2020 N.J. Super. LEXIS 227 (Nov. 9, 2020).

Defendant wasn’t entitled to a jury instruction in an assault on a police officer case that “the use of excessive force renders an otherwise lawful arrest unlawful [because it] is not a correct statement of the law.” State v. Settle, 2020 W. Va. LEXIS 730 (Nov. 4, 2020) (unpublished).*

Posted in Excessive force, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NJ: Occupants of car leaving area of a robbery not responding to light in the eyes as it passed by is not RS

OH12: Drug dog’s alert to residual odor of drugs is not a lack of PC

A drug dog’s alert to the residual odor of drugs isn’t a lack of probable cause. “Accordingly, the fact that Mox [the drug dog] could have alerted to a residual odor of drugs does not mean that there was not probable cause for the search. Mox’s positive alert at the rear passenger side of the vehicle gave Deputy Bailey probable cause to believe that drugs or evidence of a drug crime would be found in the SUV. Deputy Bailey’s subsequent search of the SUV and its contents, including the black backpack, was therefore lawful.” State v. Fritz, 2020-Ohio-5231, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 4076 (12th Dist. Nov. 9, 2020).

CSLI obtained under § 2703(d) 16 months before Carpenter was legally obtained. The search warrant for defendant’s premises backed by a 62 page affidavit showed probable cause. United States v. Todaro, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 209376 (E.D. N.Y. Nov. 9, 2020).*

Posted in Cell site location information, Dog sniff, Probable cause | Comments Off on OH12: Drug dog’s alert to residual odor of drugs is not a lack of PC

IL: There are no degrees of illegality in 4A cases with differing standards

There are no degrees of illegality in Fourth Amendment cases with differing standards. People v. Massamillo, 2020 IL App (3d) 190765, 2020 Ill. App. LEXIS 754 (Nov. 9, 2020):

Continue reading →
Posted in Reasonableness | Comments Off on IL: There are no degrees of illegality in 4A cases with differing standards

W.D.Tex.: “Laundry list” argument of a lack of particularity rejected

The officer affiant corroborated the CI’s information and there was substantial evidence of probable cause. The affidavit was not bare bones. Even if the affidavit lacked probable cause, the good faith exception applies. Defendant’s “laundry list” argument of a lack of particularity is rejected. United States v. Lovings, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 208718 (W.D. Tex. Nov. 9, 2020):

Continue reading →
Posted in General warrant, Particularity | Comments Off on W.D.Tex.: “Laundry list” argument of a lack of particularity rejected

Reason: SCOTUS Considers Whether James King Has Any Recourse Against the Cops Who Choked and Beat Him for No Good Reason

Reason: SCOTUS Considers Whether James King Has Any Recourse Against the Cops Who Choked and Beat Him for No Good Reason by Jacob Sullum:

Continue reading →
Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on Reason: SCOTUS Considers Whether James King Has Any Recourse Against the Cops Who Choked and Beat Him for No Good Reason

KS: Officer’s delay by seeking backup for safety reasons during nighttime stop where he was outnumbered was reasonable

“From the initiation of the traffic stop at 3:23 a.m. until the moment when Officer Trout observed drug paraphernalia in plain view next to Lutz, the stop was not measurably extended beyond its basic objective of processing the observed traffic violation. Calling for and waiting for backup officers was both reasonable and necessary given the time of morning, the relative inexperience of one of the two officers, the greater number of occupants in the car than officers on scene at the time, and Officer Austin’s knowledge of previous incidents involving Lutz in which firearms were discharged or were present.” State v. Lutz, 2020 Kan. LEXIS 253 (Nov. 6, 2020).

A mere passenger in a truck didn’t have standing to contest the search. The police talked to the driver who they believed was the apparent owner and the driver produced the paperwork on the truck. United States v. Lancon, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 35155 (11th Cir. Nov. 6, 2020).*

Posted in Reasonableness, Standing | Comments Off on KS: Officer’s delay by seeking backup for safety reasons during nighttime stop where he was outnumbered was reasonable

M.D.Pa.: Trash pull alone didn’t add up to PC, but GFE applies

The affidavit didn’t have enough information to corroborate the trash pull, but the evidence is apparent that the officer relied on it in good faith. United States v. Ray, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 207885 (M.D. Pa. Nov. 6, 2020):

Continue reading →
Posted in Good faith exception, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Trash pull alone didn’t add up to PC, but GFE applies

IN: Officers had sufficient suspicion of contraband on the person for a booking strip search

Officers had the requisite degree of suspicion for a strip search at the jail for a misdemeanor. He had suspicions there was something amiss with defendant’s unusual small talk, but, coupled with the facts, added up. Reagan v. State, 2020 Ind. App. LEXIS 482 (Nov. 6, 2020) (decided under state constitution):

Continue reading →
Posted in Prison and jail searches, Strip search | Comments Off on IN: Officers had sufficient suspicion of contraband on the person for a booking strip search

Vice: Police Are Tapping Into Ring Cameras to Expand Surveillance Network In Mississippi

Vice: Police Are Tapping Into Ring Cameras to Expand Surveillance Network In Mississippi by Edward Ongweso Jr (“The police department in Jackson, Mississippi is partnering with two companies to stream surveillance footage from Ring cameras in a 45-day pilot program.”)

Posted in Digital privacy, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Vice: Police Are Tapping Into Ring Cameras to Expand Surveillance Network In Mississippi