S.D.W.Va.: Uncorroborated CI, criminal history, and inconclusive trash pull didn’t support SW for house; no GFE

“Pending before the court is Defendant’s motion to suppress 48 pounds of methamphetamine, $41,000 in cash, and all other evidence seized during a search of his residence by the Metropolitan Drug Enforcement Network Team (‘MDENT’). I find that neither the warrant application nor the warrant itself contain statements of apparent facts from which a reasonable judicial officer or a reasonable police officer could find probable cause. For the reasons discussed below, Defendant’s Motion is GRANTED.” United States v. Nelson, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77079 (S.D. W.Va. Apr. 22, 2021). Even the trash pull was insubstantial evidence of drug dealing:

Continue reading →
Posted in Good faith exception, Informant hearsay, Probable cause | Comments Off on S.D.W.Va.: Uncorroborated CI, criminal history, and inconclusive trash pull didn’t support SW for house; no GFE

EFF: Your Service Provider’s Terms of Service Shouldn’t Overrule Your 4A Rights

EFF: Your Service Provider’s Terms of Service Shouldn’t Overrule Your Fourth Amendment Rights by Jennifer Lynch:

Continue reading →
Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on EFF: Your Service Provider’s Terms of Service Shouldn’t Overrule Your 4A Rights

E.D.Mo.: Constitutionality of window tint statute doesn’t have anything to do with PC for a stop for overtinting

Even if Missouri’s window tint statute was unconstitutional, something in doubt, it wouldn’t have any affect on the reasonableness of defendant’s stop for violating it, and the exclusionary rule would not apply. Factually, the officer said he couldn’t see into the car, and that’s justification for the stop for excessive tint. United States v. Harwell, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76749 (E.D. Mo. Apr. 1, 2021).*

CJA counsel ably and exhaustively litigated defendant’s suppression motion for a dog sniff for two days. She was not ineffective, and the outcome would not have been different. Davis v. United States, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76766 (D.S.C. Apr. 21, 2021).*

Summary judgment was properly granted the deputy here because no force was used against the plaintiff until she reached behind her back toward her waistband which the deputy reasonably perceived was going for a weapon. Batyukova v. Doege, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 11778 (5th Cir. Apr. 21, 2021).*

Pre-Jones warrantless GPS tracking would be saved by the good faith exception. Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for raising a Jones issue two years before it was decided. United States v. Carter, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76918 (W.D. La. Apr. 20, 2021).*

Posted in Excessive force, Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception, GPS / Tracking Data, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Constitutionality of window tint statute doesn’t have anything to do with PC for a stop for overtinting

W.D.Ky.: Out past curfew during BLM protests was PC for stop

Officers seeing defendant driving during a BLM protest curfew in June 2020 in Louisville had probable cause for the stop. United States v. Shrivers, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77047 (W.D. Ky. Apr. 21, 2021).*

A CI with a reliable track record reported defendant was selling ecstacy. That alone was likely at least reasonable suspicion, but the police used him to make a controlled buy, and that was probable cause for the stop. United States v. Crawford, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76557 (D. Neb. Mar. 30, 2021).*

Plaintiffs sued officers of the Waxahachie Police Department’s SWAT team for executing a no-knock warrant with explosive devices on the wrong house for the DEA. The defendants’ motion to dismiss the state law claims is granted. Jimerson v. Lewis, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76665 (N.D. Tex. Apr. 1, 2021).*

Petitioner’s 2255 claim for ineffective assistance of counsel in litigating a Fourth Amendment claim has to show that, if properly conducted, it would have prevailed. This was a Franks challenge, and there was probable cause anyway. United States v. Peake, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76687 (E.D. Ky. Apr. 21, 2021).*

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Warrant execution | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: Out past curfew during BLM protests was PC for stop

D.Idaho: Def’s available suppression remedy supplants Rule 41(g) motion seeking to quash SW

Defendant filed a Rule 41(g) motion for return of property that also sought to quash a search warrant. He has the remedy in his criminal case. Purbeck v. Wilkinson, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76412 (D. Idaho Apr. 21, 2021).

The trial court’s finding of voluntary consent has no support in the record and is clearly erroneous. People v. Schreiner, 2021 IL App (1st) 190191, 2021 Ill. App. LEXIS 196 (Apr. 21, 2021).*

Defendant claimed that the warrant for property and a generally described person was insufficient. “Specifically, defendant pointed out that the search warrant described the subject as ‘”Woo,” an unknown male Black, 40-45 years of age, 5’05”-5’09”, 175lbs-200lbs, dark complexion, [m]edium build, black hair worn short, brown eyes,’ and argued that the description ‘could describe thousands of African-American males within the city of Chicago.’” Defendant was there, was Woo, and was in possession of marijuana when the raid occurred, and the latter is an independent basis for arrest. People v. Lance, 2021 IL App (1st) 181665, 2021 Ill. App. LEXIS 194 (Apr. 21, 2021).

Posted in Consent, Motion to suppress, Particularity, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on D.Idaho: Def’s available suppression remedy supplants Rule 41(g) motion seeking to quash SW

IL: For “immediately apparent” in plain view, only “practical, nontechnical” probability that incriminating evidence is involved is required

On the incriminating nature of an object in plain view being “immediately apparent,” “[a]ll that is required is a ‘“practical, nontechnical”’ probability that incriminating evidence is involved.” People v. Molnar, 2021 IL App (2d) 190289, 2021 Ill. App. LEXIS 192 (Apr. 20, 2021).

The officer had reasonable suspicion defendant had been driving his vehicle. City of Jamestown v. Casarez, 2021 ND 71, 2021 N.D. LEXIS 68 (Apr. 20, 2021).*

The search authorizations for defendant’s cell phone were issued with probable cause. Even if not, there was no appreciable deterrence to be gained by exclusion here where AFOSI did their best to comply with all Fourth Amendment and rule requirements. United States v. Beck, 2021 CCA LEXIS 186 (A.F. Ct. Crim. App. Apr. 21, 2021).*

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IL: For “immediately apparent” in plain view, only “practical, nontechnical” probability that incriminating evidence is involved is required

W.D.Mich.: 1983 suit over state detention without bond barred by Younger abstention

Plaintiff detainee’s 1983 case he was being held without bond in a state prosecution is barred by Younger absention. Snowden v. Schipper, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76275 (W.D. Mich. Apr. 20, 2021).

“Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to Close, there are genuine issues of disputed fact as to whether the force Tan used in arresting her was unconstitutionally excessive under the Graham factors.” Close v. City of Vacaville, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 11692 (9th Cir. Apr. 21, 2021).*

The defendant officer had probable cause for plaintiff’s arrest for suspected child abuse. Gibson v. Brown, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 11718 (10th Cir. Apr. 21, 2021).*

Posted in Abstention, Excessive force, Probable cause | Comments Off on W.D.Mich.: 1983 suit over state detention without bond barred by Younger abstention

N.D.Cal.: Exigency for entry fails; officers knew victim was not there

The emergency aid justification for a warrantless entry into defendant’s house in a domestic dispute wasn’t applicable because there no longer was an emergency. The victim was safe elsewhere and nobody was home. Also, the good faith exception wasn’t proved to be applicable by the government. United States v. Chan, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75927 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 19, 2021).

“Johnson offers no real argument or evidence to meet this test and has not met his burden to show that the good-faith exception is inapplicable. His motion could be denied on that basis alone.” United States v. Johnson, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75289 (S.D. Miss. Apr. 20, 2021).*

2255 petitioner claiming ineffective assistance of counsel for not challenging his search has to show both that the search was invalid and that the good faith exception wouldn’t apply. Conclusory allegations not enough. Trussell v. United States, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76206 (N.D. Tex. Apr. 20, 2021).*

Posted in Abstention, Burden of pleading, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Exigency for entry fails; officers knew victim was not there

C.D.Cal.: Delayed first appearance 4A claim should be brought by habeas not § 1983

Plaintiff’s claim he did not receive his first appearance within 48 hours should have been brought by habeas under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 not a § 1983 action. Young v. Levert, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76021 (C.D. Cal. Apr. 20, 2021).

A pet dog is an object [“effects”] covered by the Fourth Amendment. Watts v. Parr, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75977 (M.D. Ga. Mar. 15, 2021).

The record supports the trial court’s conclusion that defendant did not revoke his consent to search. State v. Boeh, 2021 La. App. LEXIS 557 (La. App. 1 Cir. Apr. 16, 2021).*

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Consent | Comments Off on C.D.Cal.: Delayed first appearance 4A claim should be brought by habeas not § 1983

N.D.Ga.: Cell tower dumps to attempt to solve 12 robberies did not require SW

There were 12 robberies and officers got cell tower dumps to attempt to figure out the phone involved. Cell tower dumps did not require a search warrant. United States v. Rhodes, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75184 (N.D. Ga. Apr. 20, 2021).

The omitted information in the search warrant application “is not so self-evidently important that Special Agent Singleton’s failure to include it objectively shows a lack of ‘good faith under all the circumstances.’” Franks challenge denied. The warrant was also particular enough: “That these categories may, as a whole, encompass a significant volume of information does not mean Defendant’s warrant is insufficiently particular.” United States v. Addaquay, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75185 (N.D. Ga. Apr. 19, 2021).*

Entry into defendant’s home in hot pursuit was valid. United States v. Stevens, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75237 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 30, 2021).*

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Hot pursuit, Particularity | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Cell tower dumps to attempt to solve 12 robberies did not require SW

NC: Officer waving down a motorist at 3 am was a seizure

“The issue in this case is whether a driver is “seized” within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment when he is tailed by a marked police cruiser down empty streets at 3 a.m., followed into an empty parking lot, and then hailed down by the officer’s hand gestures. Because we conclude that no reasonable person would believe he was free to go under such circumstances, we hold that Defendant was seized for purposes of the Fourth Amendment and that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress.” State v. Steele, 2021-NCCOA-148, 2021 N.C. App. LEXIS 165 (Apr. 20, 2021).

Defendant already in prison for murder didn’t have his Fourth Amendment rights violated by a blood draw for DNA. It was a reasonable search. State v. Womble, 2021-NCCOA-150, 2021 N.C. App. LEXIS 177 (Apr. 20, 2021).

Posted in DNA, Seizure | Comments Off on NC: Officer waving down a motorist at 3 am was a seizure

WI: Officer inquiring of pill bottle in plain view during traffic stop did not unreasonably extend stop

Officer in a traffic stop inquiring of a pill bottle in plain view wasn’t unreasonable under Rodriguez. State v. Crone, 2021 Wisc. App. LEXIS 192 (Apr. 20, 2021).

The officer’s sticking his head inside defendant’s car and smelling marijuana was probable cause for an automobile exception search. United States v. O’Grady, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74692 (N.D. Ind. Apr. 19, 2021).*

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not raising Carpenter before it was decided. Terrell v. State, 2021 Ark. App. 179, 2021 Ark. App. LEXIS 186 (Apr. 21, 2021).*

A field sobriety test requires reasonable suspicion. “In the present case, there is an abundance of articulable facts to support any reasonably prudent law enforcement officer’s suspicion that Lyndon had operated a vehicle while intoxicated.” State v. Lyndon, 2021-Ohio-1370, 2021 Ohio App. LEXIS 1334 (11th Dist. Apr. 19, 2021).*

Posted in Cell site location information, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on WI: Officer inquiring of pill bottle in plain view during traffic stop did not unreasonably extend stop

Reason: Lawmakers Look To Stop the Feds From Secretly Buying Your Private Data

Reason: Lawmakers Look To Stop the Feds From Secretly Buying Your Private Data by Scott Shackford (“A 2018 Supreme Court decision was supposed to protect your location data from federal snooping. That’s not what happened.”)

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Reason: Lawmakers Look To Stop the Feds From Secretly Buying Your Private Data

CA9: Saying you just found the backpack you’re carrying in a dumpster shows no REP

“First, the court did not clearly err in finding that Gage had abandoned any reasonable expectation of privacy in the backpack by telling Officer Robinson that the group had just retrieved the backpack from a garbage dump and that he had never opened the backpack and had no idea what it contained.” Second, the automobile exception makes its search valid. United States v. Gage, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 11185 (9th Cir. Apr. 19, 2021).

Lack of a close case to this one makes the use of force subject to qualified immunity. Cunningham v. Shelby Cty., 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 11244 (6th Cir. Apr. 19, 2021).*

Anonymous 911 tip about a man slumped in a common type of car didn’t provide reasonable suspicion for defendant’s stop later. People v. Scottborgh, 2021 NY Slip Op 50316(U), 2021 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1752 (2d Dept. Apr. 15, 2021).*

Posted in Abandonment, Informant hearsay, Qualified immunity, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CA9: Saying you just found the backpack you’re carrying in a dumpster shows no REP

OH12: EPIC check on passenger exceeded permissible bounds of traffic stop

EPIC check for picture of passenger exceeded the permissible basis of the traffic stop. There was no reason for it. Motion to suppress properly granted. State v. Shaibi, 2021-Ohio-1352, 2021 Ohio App. LEXIS 1323 (12th Dist. Apr. 19, 2021).

Police received an anonymous tip where defendant was staying. They corroborated it by further research and seeing his car parked there. Commonwealth v. Carey, 2021 Pa. Super. LEXIS 222 (Apr. 19, 2021).*

There was probable cause on the totality from the inferences in the affidavit for search warrant, even excluding that which was negligently included. State v. Derifield, 2021-Ohio-1351, 2021 Ohio App. LEXIS 1327 (12th Dist. Apr. 19, 2021).*

“Because the deputies lacked arguable probable cause to arrest Harris on either count, we easily determine that the arrest violated Harris’s clearly established Fourth Amendment rights. … The deputies are not entitled to qualified immunity for the arrests, nor are they entitled to summary judgment on these claims.” Harris v. Wingo, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 11147 (11th Cir. Apr. 19, 2021).*

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH12: EPIC check on passenger exceeded permissible bounds of traffic stop

N.D.Okla.: SW for Native American lands issued by state court judge that may be invalid under McGirt v. Oklahoma is saved by GFE

A state search warrant for Native American lands that later may be invalid because it was not issued by a tribal or federal court under McGirt v. Oklahoma is saved by the good faith exception. United States v. Hamett, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74207 (N.D. Okla. Apr. 18, 2021). Similar: United States v. Patterson, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29906 (E.D. Okla. Feb. 18, 2021).

Tribal officers had consent of the owner to enter a camper defendant was staying in. He had guest standing. United States v. Story, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73660 (D.S.D. Mar. 2, 2021).*

Defendant does not get a CoA for appealing denial of his 2255 that foreign officials under foreign law in their own country don’t violate the Fourth Amendment. Skillern v. United States, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 11056 (11th Cir. Apr. 16, 2021).

Posted in Consent, Foreign searches, Good faith exception | Comments Off on N.D.Okla.: SW for Native American lands issued by state court judge that may be invalid under McGirt v. Oklahoma is saved by GFE

GFE is not an exception to warrant requirement, only the exclusionary rule (dissent)

Per the dissent, the Michigan Court of Appeals erred in holding in an unpublished opinion that the good faith exception is an exception to the warrant requirement, not the exclusionary rule. People v. Mead, 2020 Mich. App. LEXIS 6223 (Sept. 17, 2020) (unpublished). People v. Mead, 2021 Mich. LEXIS 617 (Apr. 16, 2021) (5-2) (dissent from denial of review).

Reasonable suspicion can come from an “emerging tableau” of information. “And when in the course of these inquiries the officer formulates new suspicions based on the “emerging tableau” of information, the officer is permitted to “increase the scope of his investigation by degrees.” Chhien, 266 F.3d at 6 (citing Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 10 (1968) (discussing law enforcement’s need for ‘an escalating set of flexible responses’)).” United States v. Carr, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73809 (D. Me. Apr. 16, 2021).

The state court considered petitioner’s Fourth Amendment claim on direct appeal, so further review is barred by Stone. Benavidez v. Espinoza, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74023 (C.D. Cal. Mar. 8, 2021).*

Posted in Good faith exception, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on GFE is not an exception to warrant requirement, only the exclusionary rule (dissent)

WaPo: First Amendment groups ask Supreme Court for access to surveillance court opinions

WaPo: First Amendment groups ask Supreme Court for access to surveillance court opinions by Spencer S. Hsu:

Continue reading →
Posted in National security | Comments Off on WaPo: First Amendment groups ask Supreme Court for access to surveillance court opinions

M.D.Pa.: 13 month delay between seizure of 2 cell phones and their search was not unreasonable

13 month delay between seizure of two cell phones and their search was not unreasonable on the totality. United States v. Wright, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73534 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 16, 2021):

Continue reading →
Posted in Cell phones, Warrant execution | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: 13 month delay between seizure of 2 cell phones and their search was not unreasonable

KS: Paying for a car you don’t own doesn’t give standing

Just because defendant paid for the car he was a passenger in, it wasn’t his. He lacked standing in the car. State v. Scheuerman, 2021 Kan. App. LEXIS 15 (Apr. 16, 2021).

2255 petitioner’s claim the video to his surveillance system was seized in violation of the Fourth Amendment is rejected on post-conviction. He had a full and fair opportunity to litigate it before conviction. Forrest v. United States, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73353 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 16, 2021).*

Defendant’s arrest at the airport was with probable cause for a sex offense, and his statement is not suppressed. That statement corroborated the alleged victim’s version. King v. State, 2021 Alas. App. LEXIS 38 (Apr. 16, 2021).*

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Standing | Comments Off on KS: Paying for a car you don’t own doesn’t give standing