Techdirt: Federal Judge Says FBI Misled Magistrate When Seeking Safe Deposit Warrants, OKs Searches Anyway

Techdirt: Federal Judge Says FBI Misled Magistrate When Seeking Safe Deposit Warrants, OKs Searches Anyway by Tim Cushing (“Unfortunately, the federal court handling this case doesn’t think the FBI’s lie matters, at least not in terms of determining probable cause. The court apparently agrees the magistrate was misled by the warrant affidavit which swore the FBI would not search the boxes to further its criminal investigation. But misleading another court is fine with this court, since the FBI probably would have just come up with another satisfactory excuse for its pretextual searches.”)

Posted in Franks doctrine, Good faith exception | Comments Off on Techdirt: Federal Judge Says FBI Misled Magistrate When Seeking Safe Deposit Warrants, OKs Searches Anyway

OH8: No PC for hot pursuit into house on less than RS

The state showed no probable cause to justify a warrantless entry into the home of a fleeing misdemeanant. Police got a citizen’s report of a possible impaired driver. When they found the car, it had just pulled into the driveway where it belonged. City of Westlake v. Roberts, 2022-Ohio-3675, 2022 Ohio App. LEXIS 3459 (8th Dist. Oct. 13, 2022).

Defendant gave his passcode to his cell phone when he was arrested, and he claimed it was under coercive circumstances. The government isn’t seeking anything to admit anything off the cell phone anyway, so it’s moot. United States v. Hearst, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 187824 (N.D. Ga. Oct. 14, 2022).*

Plaintiff may not “skip ahead” to federal court to try to enjoin a state prosecution under Younger. Tate v. Milwaukee Police Dep’t Criminal Investigation Bureau & City of Milwaukee, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 187164 (E.D. Wis. Oct. 13, 2022).*

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Emergency / exigency, Hot pursuit, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on OH8: No PC for hot pursuit into house on less than RS

D.N.M.: There is no exclusionary rule under Rule 41(g)

An action for return of property under Rule 41(g) is not a motion to suppress and does not invoke any exclusionary rule. Eastman v. United States, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 188438 (D.N.M. Oct. 14, 2022):

Continue reading →
Posted in Exclusionary rule, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on D.N.M.: There is no exclusionary rule under Rule 41(g)

E.D.Ky.: Def shows nothing to support claim taint team violated attorney-client privilege in review after SW

Defendant argued that the execution of this search warrant resulted in disclosure of attorney-client privileged information because of alleged misuse of a taint team. But, he provides no context or anything to go on. Taint teams are recognized in such situation. United States v. Taylor, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 188060 (E.D. Ky. Oct. 13, 2022).

After a traffic stop at a gas station, the officer diverted to investigate suspicious activity at the gas station and not the traffic stop. This violated the Fourth Amendment. State v. Fish, 2022 Ga. App. LEXIS 479 (Oct. 13, 2022).

Plaintiff’s § 1983 case against his state search fails both under Heck v. Humphrey and on the merits. He was on home detention in lieu of jail, and any searches could be without warrants but upon probable cause which “[t]hey unquestionably” had. He also consented. Johnson v. Piper, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 188112 (W.D. Ky. Oct. 13, 2022).*

The officers had a “fair probability” that drugs would be in defendant’s car supporting a search under the automobile exception. United States v. Haworth, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 28586 (6th Cir. Oct. 13, 2022).*

Posted in Automobile exception, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion, Taint team, Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: Def shows nothing to support claim taint team violated attorney-client privilege in review after SW

OH8: Trial court’s order to permit def to inspect victim’s home which was scene of the crime violated 4A rights of victim

To prepare for trial, defendant sought an inspection of the victim’s home, the scene of the alleged crime of attempted murder. The trial court erred in the balancing the interests involved of the defendant’s right to a fair trial and right to prepared counsel with the victim’s Fourth Amendment right of privacy in her home. The victims have a right of privacy in their own home. (The state constitution also has a victim’s rights provision, but that doesn’t necessarily alter the outcome.) State v. Counts, 2022-Ohio-3666, 2022 Ohio App. LEXIS 3470 (8th Dist. Oct. 13, 2022):

Continue reading →
Posted in Probable cause, Reasonableness | Comments Off on OH8: Trial court’s order to permit def to inspect victim’s home which was scene of the crime violated 4A rights of victim

C.D.Cal.: SWAT team raid damage to house included in insurance coverage

Plaintiff’s claim against defendant insurance company for failing to pay an insurance claim for damage during a SWAT team raid on his house goes forward. The policy’s exclusionary clauses are overbroad under California law. Heard v. QBE Ins. Corp., 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 187748 (C.D. Cal. Oct. 13, 2022)*:

Continue reading →
Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on C.D.Cal.: SWAT team raid damage to house included in insurance coverage

D.S.D.: Time waiting for someone to come to remove car, tow truck or friend, was part of incidents of stop

When the vehicle will be removed because of no licensed person to take control, the time between the calling of the tow truck or a friend or family member to take it away and their arrival is part of the incidents of the traffic stop, and the use of a drug dog then was reasonable. United States v. Nelson, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 187344 (D.S.D. Oct. 11, 2022).

The ongoing nature of defendant’s meth dealing showed the search warrant was not stale. Aguinaga v. State, 2022 Tex. App. LEXIS 7604 (Tex. App. – Eastland Oct. 13, 2022).*

The officers had knowledge that the vehicle the juvenile was in had a handgun in it when it was stolen. That’s reasonable suspicion for a vehicle sweep. State ex rel. K.K., 2022 La. App. LEXIS 1761 ( La. App. 4 Cir. Oct. 12, 2022).*

Posted in Dog sniff, Protective sweep, Staleness | Comments Off on D.S.D.: Time waiting for someone to come to remove car, tow truck or friend, was part of incidents of stop

OH: Exclusionary rule does not apply to statutory violations, here a parole search

Defendant signed a consent to parole search form, but the statute says it has to be on reasonable grounds. Here, even if the statute was violated, the exclusionary rule applies to constitutional violations, not statutory ones. State v. Campbell, 2022-Ohio-3626, 2022 Ohio LEXIS 2098 (Oct. 13, 2022).

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not moving to suppress incriminating jail telephone calls. Toha v. Fla. AG, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 185228 (S.D. Fla. Sep. 15, 2022).*

Even if Franks applies to arrest warrants, an open question in this circuit, defendant didn’t satisfy it. United States v. Powell, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 185581 (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 11, 2022).*

The affidavit for warrant was not so deficient that the warrant wouldn’t have issued. The good faith exception also applies. United States v. Jones, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 185980 (D. Minn. Oct. 11, 2022).*

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on OH: Exclusionary rule does not apply to statutory violations, here a parole search

CA5: Standard of review for QI in excessive force cases

In this excessive force case, the Fifth Circuit discusses qualified immunity in the heat of a confrontation. Henderson v. Harris County, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 28436 (5th Cir. Oct. 12, 2022). The standard of review:

Continue reading →
Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA5: Standard of review for QI in excessive force cases

ProPublica/NBC News: Police Need Warrants to Search Homes. Child Welfare Agents Almost Never Get One.

ProPublica/NBC News: Police Need Warrants to Search Homes. Child Welfare Agents Almost Never Get One. by Eli Harper (“Each year, child protective services agencies inspect the homes of roughly 3.5 million children, opening refrigerators and closets without a warrant. Only about 5% of these kids are ultimately found to have been physically or sexually abused.”)

Posted in Administrative search | Comments Off on ProPublica/NBC News: Police Need Warrants to Search Homes. Child Welfare Agents Almost Never Get One.

FL1: SW cured alleged defect in probation search where roommate wasn’t on probation

Defendant, not on probation, lived with two probationers. POs showed up for a probation search, and when they saw the extent of what they found and had a nonprobationer, they got a search warrant for the rest of the house. The trial court erred in not finding the search warrant validated the search rest of the search. State v. Green, 2022 Fla. App. LEXIS 6862 (Fla. 1st DCA Oct. 12, 2022),

Prison administrators accessing plaintiff’s account information in a jail isn’s a search. Schneider v. BCCF, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 186191 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 12, 2022).* (Classic third-party doctrine.)

Defendant claims staleness as to child porn in the objection to the R&R, but he doesn’t expound. United States v. Childers, No. 22-4-DLB-EBA, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 186372 (E.D. Ky. Oct. 12, 2022).* [Wouldn’t have worked anyway.]

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not moving to suppress incriminating jail telephone calls. Toha v. Fla. AG, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 185228 (S.D. Fla. Sep. 15, 2022).*

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Probation / Parole search, Staleness | Comments Off on FL1: SW cured alleged defect in probation search where roommate wasn’t on probation

FL1: Illegal patdown led to flight and lawful abandonment

Defendant was lawfully stopped, but his patdown was unreasonable. Then he fled on foot. That was abandonment, despite the illegal search. Atwood v. State, 2022 Fla. App. LEXIS 6855 (Fla. 1st DCA Oct. 12, 2022):

Continue reading →
Posted in Abandonment | Comments Off on FL1: Illegal patdown led to flight and lawful abandonment

D.Minn.: “‘The Fourth Amendment’s particularity requirement is a standard of practical accuracy rather than a hypertechnical one.'”

“’The Fourth Amendment’s particularity requirement is a standard of practical accuracy rather than a hypertechnical one.’” Defendant’s particularity argument fails. It was particular enough, and good faith exception applies. United States v. Jones, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 185980 (D. Minn. Oct. 11, 2022):

Continue reading →
Posted in Particularity | Comments Off on D.Minn.: “‘The Fourth Amendment’s particularity requirement is a standard of practical accuracy rather than a hypertechnical one.'”

WaPo: All the ways Amazon’s home gadgets are spying on you

WaPo: All the ways Amazon’s home gadgets are spying on you by Geoffrey A. Fowler (“You may not realize all the ways Amazon is watching your home, your family and you.”). The title inside: Tour Amazon’s dream home, where every appliance is also a spy

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on WaPo: All the ways Amazon’s home gadgets are spying on you

CA9: Even conceding potential 4A violations, there was independent source for SW

Even assuming multiple Fourth Amendment violations, the exclusionary rule would not be applied because the police had an independent source in a search warrant that did not depend on the illegal entry. An anticipatory warrant was contemplated but never sought. (There were digital photographs with metadata showing the search occurred before the warrant issued.) United States v. Saelee, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 28234 (9th Cir. Oct. 11, 2022):

Continue reading →
Posted in Independent source | Comments Off on CA9: Even conceding potential 4A violations, there was independent source for SW

OH3: An expert witness is not required on the staleness of CP

There is no requirement of an expert in child pornography investigation to be an affiant to provide information about lack of staleness. Also, this was raised for the first time on appeal. State v. Benedict, 2022-Ohio-3600, 2022 Ohio App. LEXIS 3409 (3d Dist. Oct. 11, 2022).

“Schank argues that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to articulate viable arguments and failing to cite relevant case law in the defendant’s motion to suppress. Trial counsel did file a suppression motion, in which she requested an evidentiary hearing and raised several challenges to the validity of the search warrant. Counsel is not ineffective because she did not obtain a favorable ruling. See Hodge v. Haeberlin, 579 F.3d 627, 645 (6th Cir. 2009).” Schank v. United States, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 28144 (6th Cir. Oct. 7, 2022).*

Plaintiff’s complaint that the defendant state judge ordered him to give a DNA sample or be held in contempt, along with claims that he didn’t like the judge’s look at him, was barred by judicial immunity. Williams v. Heekin, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 184796 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 7, 2022).*

Posted in DNA, Ineffective assistance, Staleness | Comments Off on OH3: An expert witness is not required on the staleness of CP

CT: Entry onto def’s deck was for community caretaking function

The officer’s entry onto defendant’s deck here was of a community caretaking function to inform defendant that a loved one was going to the hospital. It was like a knock-and-talk. State v. Kuehn, 2022 Conn. Super. LEXIS 2075 (Sep. 13, 2022).

An SCA (Stored Communications Act) order in 2015 was complied with. It wasn’t clear until 2020 that those orders violated Arizona law. Therefore, no suppression. United States v. Rakestraw, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 184209 (D. Ariz. Oct. 6, 2022).*

The officer acted diligently with the tasks related to the stop as it unfolded, and he did not drag it out. Moving defendant’s backpack was not a meaningful interference with his possessory interest. United States v. Murray, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 183890 (W.D. Mo. Aug. 10, 2022).*

Posted in Community caretaking function, Curtilage, Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CT: Entry onto def’s deck was for community caretaking function

D.Neb.: Eviction of unruly hotel guest is loss of REP in room as soon as decision is made, even without statute authorizing it

Eviction of an unruly guest from a motel or hotel results in a loss of the renter’s reasonable expectation of privacy even if there is no statute governing it. Thus, the proprietor can hand over the keys to the police to assist. United States v. O’Dell, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 184172 (D. Neb. Sep. 28, 2022).

The government did not show that any exception to the warrant requirement applied to his vehicle: Not the automobile exception, not community caretaking. Suppressed. United States v. Williams, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 183816 (N.D.W. Va. Aug. 25, 2022).*

Defendant was not prejudiced by defense counsel’s failure to challenge his arrest. There was a warrant and probable cause, and his father let officers into the house to arrest him. Even if it was deficient to not have procured the dashcam video, having viewed it, it adds nothing and shows nobody lied about anything. United States v. Holland, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 183876 (N.D. Fla. Aug. 25, 2022).*

Posted in Automobile exception, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Eviction of unruly hotel guest is loss of REP in room as soon as decision is made, even without statute authorizing it

WaPo: 6 questions about flying with marijuana, answered

WaPo: 6 questions about flying with marijuana, answered | What to know about federal laws, TSA and flying with CBD by Natalie B. Compton:

Continue reading →
Posted in Airport searches | Comments Off on WaPo: 6 questions about flying with marijuana, answered

MA: Ptf stated claim for unjustified community caretaking entry to investigate alleged elder abuse

Plaintiff was caring for a 95-year-old retired priest. She stated a claim for a Fourth Amendment violation for a warrantless entry into her house, in part, under the community caretaking function without justification. Gallagher v. S. Shore Hosp., Inc., 2022 Mass. App. LEXIS 108 (Oct. 6, 2022).

Defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in the exterior grounds of a multi-unit dwelling where others could come and go. He had the burden of proof on that and showed not much of anything. United States v. Davis, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 183204 (D.N.J. Oct. 6, 2022).*

Motion for expedited consideration of TRO for return of cell phone is denied on the papers. A briefing schedule is set, including the interested media. Lindell v. United States, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 183460 (D. Minn. Oct. 6, 2022).* (In this case, the media wouldn’t have known, but for filing the action.)

Posted in Burden of pleading, Burden of proof, Community caretaking function, Curtilage | Comments Off on MA: Ptf stated claim for unjustified community caretaking entry to investigate alleged elder abuse