FL1: SW cured alleged defect in probation search where roommate wasn’t on probation

Defendant, not on probation, lived with two probationers. POs showed up for a probation search, and when they saw the extent of what they found and had a nonprobationer, they got a search warrant for the rest of the house. The trial court erred in not finding the search warrant validated the search rest of the search. State v. Green, 2022 Fla. App. LEXIS 6862 (Fla. 1st DCA Oct. 12, 2022),

Prison administrators accessing plaintiff’s account information in a jail isn’s a search. Schneider v. BCCF, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 186191 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 12, 2022).* (Classic third-party doctrine.)

Defendant claims staleness as to child porn in the objection to the R&R, but he doesn’t expound. United States v. Childers, No. 22-4-DLB-EBA, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 186372 (E.D. Ky. Oct. 12, 2022).* [Wouldn’t have worked anyway.]

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not moving to suppress incriminating jail telephone calls. Toha v. Fla. AG, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 185228 (S.D. Fla. Sep. 15, 2022).*

This entry was posted in Prison and jail searches, Probation / Parole search, Staleness. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.