Monthly Archives: December 2021

S.D.N.Y.: Press motion for disclosure of SW affidavit denied because investigation ongoing

“The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press (‘RCFP’), claiming rights of access grounded in the common law, asks the Court to unseal documents relating to a search warrant dated November 5, 2021 (the ‘Search Warrant’), which was executed at … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Warrant papers | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Press motion for disclosure of SW affidavit denied because investigation ongoing

E.D.Mich.: Stop was completely lacking in RS

This black defendant’s stop six minutes after a shooting call in a heavily black neighborhood (2,000 within a half mile radius) was completely lacking in reasonable suspicion. The court goes on for many pages about the government’s proffered reasonable suspicion … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Stop was completely lacking in RS

NC: This traffic stop was not based on an objectively reasonable view of statute; stop suppressed

The officer’s mistaken view of the law allegedly justifying the stop was not objectively reasonable under Heien and thus completely without reasonable suspicion. State v. Jonas, 2021-NCCOA-660, 2021 N.C. App. LEXIS 678 (Dec. 7, 2021). This probation search was valid: … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Reasonableness | Comments Off on NC: This traffic stop was not based on an objectively reasonable view of statute; stop suppressed

MS: No REP in contraband cell phone in prison

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in a contraband cell phone in prison. United States v. Jackson, 866 F.3d 982 (8th Cir. 2017). Walker v. State, 2021 Miss. App. LEXIS 502 (Dec. 7, 2021). Accord: United States v. Basaldua, … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Cell phones, Prison and jail searches, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Staleness | Comments Off on MS: No REP in contraband cell phone in prison

N.D.Ind.: 2254(d) “unreasonable application” review considered whether correct case law applied

In this 2254, the argument was that the state court’s application of law violated 2254’s “unreasonable” application standard, but it didn’t. The question was whether Michigan v. Long or Arizona v. Gant applies. “In sum, the State courts’ reliance on … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Qualified immunity, Seizure, Unreasonable application / § 2254(d) | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: 2254(d) “unreasonable application” review considered whether correct case law applied

LA5: Two CIs provided RS for def’s vehicle stop without need for traffic offense

The trial court’s denial of suppress is affirmed. There were two CIs. One provided details about defendant’s drug operation and the places and vehicles involved. The other provided predictive information that panned out. By the time defendant’s vehicle was stopped, … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on LA5: Two CIs provided RS for def’s vehicle stop without need for traffic offense

DE: Mere citation of a case in motion to suppress didn’t put state and court on notice as to other issues

Defendant’s citation of a case in his motion to suppress that was on point to only one issue but not the others was insufficient to put the state and court on notice as to the others. State v. Hollar, 2021 … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on DE: Mere citation of a case in motion to suppress didn’t put state and court on notice as to other issues

LA1: Subjective beliefs of officer irrelevant when PC exists

The trial court is reversed. There was probable cause for defendant’s stop. “Under the law, ‘the subjective beliefs or expectations of the detaining officer’ are irrelevant.” State v. Lee, 2021 La. App. LEXIS 1840 (La. App. 1 Cir. Dec. 6, … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Reasonableness | Comments Off on LA1: Subjective beliefs of officer irrelevant when PC exists

Reason: Dallas Police Took $106,000 From a Traveler. They Haven’t Explained Why.

Reason: Dallas Police Took $106,000 From a Traveler. They Haven’t Explained Why. (“A police dog’s alert prompted the search, and the money was seized via civil asset forfeiture.”)

Posted in Forfeiture | Comments Off on Reason: Dallas Police Took $106,000 From a Traveler. They Haven’t Explained Why.

CNS: State court could put cellphone ‘dragnets’ in knots

Courthouse News Service: State court could put cellphone ‘dragnets’ in knots (“Cops want to use phone data to identify everyone who was nearby when a crime happened — a system that for civil libertarians comes at too high a privacy … Continue reading

Posted in geofence | Comments Off on CNS: State court could put cellphone ‘dragnets’ in knots

TN: No standing in text messages on codef’s cell phone

Defense counsel could not be ineffective for not moving to suppress text messages on the codefendant’s cell phone where defendant had no standing. Wells v. State, 2021 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 553 (Dec. 7, 2021). There is no reasonable expectation … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Prison and jail searches, Protective sweep, Standing | Comments Off on TN: No standing in text messages on codef’s cell phone

E.D.N.Y.: For § 1988 fee shifting, SCOTUS expert fees not awarded, only local rate

The fact expert Fourth Amendment counsel would have charged the client $1,000-1,800 before SCOTUS isn’t binding on the district court for fee shifting. The local rate is what’s reasonable. Agudath Israel of America v. Hochul, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 233088 … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Mail and packages, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: For § 1988 fee shifting, SCOTUS expert fees not awarded, only local rate

S.D.Ohio: Alleged 4A violation doesn’t create a lack of subject matter jurisdiction

A Fourth Amendment violation in a case, among other things, does not create a lack of jurisdiction. Forrest v. United States, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 232495 (S.D.Ohio Dec. 6, 2021). [Prospective clients still ask this here, as little as a … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: Alleged 4A violation doesn’t create a lack of subject matter jurisdiction

S.D.Ind.: Handcuffed def could have jacket pocket searched incident to arrest

The search of defendant’s jacket pockets when he was arrested was valid under the search incident doctrine even though he was handcuffed. United States v. Coates, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 232798 (S.D.Ind. Dec. 6, 2021). Defendant had a right to … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Search incident | Comments Off on S.D.Ind.: Handcuffed def could have jacket pocket searched incident to arrest

CA7: Malicious prosecution case is based on a lack of PC

Malicious prosecution claim is ultimately based on a lack of probable cause. Summary judgment here inappropriate. Gupta v. Melloh, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 35934 (7th Cir. Dec. 6, 2021):

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA7: Malicious prosecution case is based on a lack of PC

CA4: After an agreed remand for a Franks hearing, no materiality found

The parties previously agreed to a remand for a Franks hearing. Now it’s back. “None of these omissions-even when viewed together-change the probable-cause determination. At the outset, Hall’s identified omissions are problematic for him to rely upon. For omissions about … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on CA4: After an agreed remand for a Franks hearing, no materiality found

CA1: Protective sweep for weapons requires only objective reasonableness, and actual fear not required

A First Circuit panel overrules its caselaw as inconsistent with SCOTUS cases that a frisk for weapons must be both objective and with subjective fear: “United States v. Lott that officers cannot do a ‘frisk for weapons … where, although … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Issue preclusion, Protective sweep, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA1: Protective sweep for weapons requires only objective reasonableness, and actual fear not required

N.D.Ill.: Evil intent irrelevant in excessive force case if it all still objectively reasonable

“Issues of motive and intent are essentially irrelevant in [an excessive force] case. The test in an excessive force case is an objective one. Thus, ‘[a]n officer’s evil intentions will not make a Fourth Amendment violation out of an objectively … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Issue preclusion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: Evil intent irrelevant in excessive force case if it all still objectively reasonable

IL: Lack of PC to arrest voids search incident to it

A lack of probable cause to arrest leads to voiding the search incident to arrest. People v. Freeman, 2021 IL App (1st) 200053, 2021 Ill. App. LEXIS 655 (Dec. 6, 2021). While marijuana seeds and stems aren’t federal contraband, searching … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Search incident | Comments Off on IL: Lack of PC to arrest voids search incident to it

MI: Inventory was reasonable and not pretextual

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not challenging the inventory search of defendant’s car because the inventory was reasonable. After the arrest of the occupants, the vehicle had to be towed, and the inventory was within policy and not a pretext … Continue reading

Posted in Hot pursuit, Inventory, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on MI: Inventory was reasonable and not pretextual