Monthly Archives: February 2021

CA5: Some things were innocent in isolation, but they were RS on the totality

Some factors were innocent on their own, but the totality there was reasonable suspicion. United States v. Goodin, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 3881 (5th Cir. Feb. 10, 2021)*:

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA5: Some things were innocent in isolation, but they were RS on the totality

CA3: Failure to factually plead lack of PC or malice for a 4A malicious prosecution claim makes it fail

Karkalas v. Marks, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 3868 (3d Cir. Feb. 11, 2021):

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA3: Failure to factually plead lack of PC or malice for a 4A malicious prosecution claim makes it fail

IN: Cell phone seized under SW could be searched later than the deadline in the warrant

The state had the forfeiture claimant’s cell phone in hand, but didn’t actually search it within the limit of the warrant. This was reasonable, following Wolf v. State, 266 P.3d 1169, 1174 (Idaho Ct. App. 2011). Brown v. Eaton, 2021 … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Particularity, Qualified immunity, Warrant execution | Comments Off on IN: Cell phone seized under SW could be searched later than the deadline in the warrant

MA: State bears the burden of showing there is no investigatory purpose for an inventory

The state of Massachusetts bears the burden of showing there is no investigatory purpose for an inventory. Commonwealth v. Lek, 2021 Mass. App. LEXIS 19 (Feb. 11, 2021):

Posted in Inventory | Comments Off on MA: State bears the burden of showing there is no investigatory purpose for an inventory

OR: “[J]ust keep your hands where I can see them” is a seizure

“[J]ust keep your hands where I can see them” is a seizure under the Oregon Constitution. State v. Soto-Navarro, 309 Ore. App. 218 (Feb. 10, 2021):

Posted in Pretext, Seizure | Comments Off on OR: “[J]ust keep your hands where I can see them” is a seizure

FL1: Screen shot of of meth on a scale on driver’s cell phone permitted dog sniff during writing of traffic ticket

Defendant was stopped for a traffic offense, and he was unusually nervous. Sitting on his left leg was a cell phone with the screen on showing a picture of meth on a scale. That justified a dog sniff while a … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Franks doctrine, Standards of review | Comments Off on FL1: Screen shot of of meth on a scale on driver’s cell phone permitted dog sniff during writing of traffic ticket

CA3: Crashing a fleeing car here wasn’t excessive force

Crashing a fleeing car here wasn’t unreasonable as excessive force. “Here, we agree with the District Court’s determination that no reasonable juror could find that the force used by Officer Biagini was excessive. It is beyond dispute that, in the … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Standing, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on CA3: Crashing a fleeing car here wasn’t excessive force

D.Kan.: Pro se motion to suppress of represented def doesn’t attach affidavits, say why 4A or statute violated, or cite any law; denied for having counsel

Defendant is represented by counsel, then files a motion to suppress. “Defendant’s pro se motion reflects a misunderstanding of court proceedings. The Defendant fails to specify which search warrant he objects to, fails to provide a copy, or copies, of … Continue reading

Posted in Motion to suppress, Pretext, Standards of review | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Pro se motion to suppress of represented def doesn’t attach affidavits, say why 4A or statute violated, or cite any law; denied for having counsel

E.D.N.Y.: 6 am knock-and-talk was not unreasonable

A 6 am knock-and-talk was not shown to be unreasonable [on the totality] under Jardines. Defendant doesn’t claim that he was too sleepy to respond to them. United States v. Ofsink, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24933 (E.D. N.Y. Feb. 8, … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Curtilage, Knock and talk | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: 6 am knock-and-talk was not unreasonable

E.D.Cal.: Officer wasn’t required to wait around for alternative means to tow vehicle before impoundment

“It is true that defendant made multiple requests to contact AAA to tow his truck, and he eventually suggested arranging for his father or friends, who were purportedly nearby, to move his truck to avoid impoundment. There was no telling … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Inventory | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: Officer wasn’t required to wait around for alternative means to tow vehicle before impoundment

CA11: Reasonableness doesn’t require a stop as soon as RS develops

An officer who observed a traffic offense and waited for defendant to drive another five blocks could reasonably still stop the car. “Although the officers did not initiate the traffic stop for seven minutes, and did not pull Brown over … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA11: Reasonableness doesn’t require a stop as soon as RS develops

TX3: Even if revenge porn statute was unconstitutional, that doesn’t nullify a SW issued for it

Defendant was indicted for a revenge porn threat. A search warrant was obtained for his phone to prove he had the picture in the threat. He argued the search warrant was void because the revenge porn statute was unconstitutional. Whether … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Strip search | Comments Off on TX3: Even if revenge porn statute was unconstitutional, that doesn’t nullify a SW issued for it

CA1 upholds border search of electronic devices

Alasaad v. Mayorkas, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 3586 (1st Cir. Feb. 9, 2021):

Posted in Border search, Cell phones | Comments Off on CA1 upholds border search of electronic devices

NJ adopts standard for additional discovery of a potential Franks violation

New Jersey adopts a specific preliminary showing requirement for additional discovery of a Franks violation. State v. Desir, 2021 N.J. LEXIS 127 (Feb. 9, 2021). From the syllabus:

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on NJ adopts standard for additional discovery of a potential Franks violation

IL: When exigency forms is determined on the totality

On the totality of circumstances, there was exigency for the police entry, despite their delay. All in all, the delay was reasonable as information was learned, and then it was time to act. People v. Kulpin, 2021 IL App (2d) … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on IL: When exigency forms is determined on the totality

D.N.M.: Tracing IP address to def does not require affiant exclude all other Internet users in area

Defendant was charged with stalking a former boss. A disguised email was traced by metadata to defendant’s router. His computer was searched, and the email was found. The question of probable cause for the search warrant does not require the … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Franks doctrine, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Tracing IP address to def does not require affiant exclude all other Internet users in area

CA2: Later search of bag was inevitable discovery overcoming objection to first search

Even if the search of defendant’s bag was invalid, he was taken to the police station and his bag was validly searched again an inventory. United States v. Ruffin, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 3351 (2d Cir. Feb. 8, 2021). Defendant’s … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Inevitable discovery, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on CA2: Later search of bag was inevitable discovery overcoming objection to first search

CA10: De novo review overcomes a “skewed” finding of district court

Applying the Ornelas de novo review standard, the court reassesses the evidence and finds reasonable suspicion for the detention. The district court’s view of the evidence of reasonable suspicion was heavily skewed toward the government’s proof. Still, there is reasonable … Continue reading

Posted in Standards of review, Waiver | Comments Off on CA10: De novo review overcomes a “skewed” finding of district court

NE: Three day old information vehicle was involved in a shooting was RS

There was reasonable suspicion for the stop of defendant’s vehicle on a three day old report of it being involved in a shooting. On appeal from a denial of a motion to suppress, the evidence from both the suppression hearing … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Staleness, Standards of review | Comments Off on NE: Three day old information vehicle was involved in a shooting was RS

AL: A visitor to premises targeted by a SW who is more than a “transient visitor” is subject to search

Defendant was a visitor at a house that was searched under a warrant for drugs. Her purse was searched, too. “Because Powers was more than a ‘transient visitor’ at Moyers’s house and had a known relationship to the premises, and … Continue reading

Posted in Overseizure, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on AL: A visitor to premises targeted by a SW who is more than a “transient visitor” is subject to search