Monthly Archives: December 2020

NBC News: Bodycam footage of botched police raid in Chicago sparks outrage

NBC News: Bodycam footage of botched police raid in Chicago sparks outrage (“The video of the February 2019 raid shows police officers handcuffed a naked woman and searched her home for nearly an hour before realizing they raided the wrong … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on NBC News: Bodycam footage of botched police raid in Chicago sparks outrage

CA11: Dist Ct acted within its discretion denying a suppression motion as untimely

Defense counsel waited past the pretrial motions deadline to file a motion to suppress complaining that he needed a state court transcript, but that hearing was long ago. The district court acted within its discretion in denying the motion for … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on CA11: Dist Ct acted within its discretion denying a suppression motion as untimely

OH5: Def’s large knife on his belt justified patdown for additional weapons

“We concur with the trial court that Officer Sholl had a sufficient reasonable objective basis under the totality of the circumstances to frisk appellant for weapons. Appellant had a large fixed blade knife on his belt loop. A pat down … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause | Comments Off on OH5: Def’s large knife on his belt justified patdown for additional weapons

WY: Questions about travel plans are allowed to put trip in “context”

Basic questions about where defendant and his passenger were going were reasonable to put their trip into “context.” That led to reasonable suspicion. Pryce v. State, 2020 WY 151, 2020 Wyo. LEXIS 178 (Dec. 16, 2020). (And one could ask: … Continue reading

Posted in Digital Searches, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on WY: Questions about travel plans are allowed to put trip in “context”

DE: Actual presence of accused not required for suppression hearing and video appearance constitutional

A virtual suppression hearing that was a mixed question of law and fact didn’t require the actual presence of the accused under the Sixth Amendment’s confrontation clause, following United States v. Rosenschein, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 129889 (D.N.M. July 23, … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on DE: Actual presence of accused not required for suppression hearing and video appearance constitutional

N.D.Iowa: SW affidavit was sloppy and partly misleading, but not intentionally so

“A substantial basis existed for the court to determine probable cause existed on the face of the warrant affidavit.” It was, however, sloppy and partly misleading, but, on the totality there is no Franks violation. United States v. Johnson, 2020 … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Standards of review | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: SW affidavit was sloppy and partly misleading, but not intentionally so

M.D.Fla.: Storage unit rental agreement consented to landlord entry

The rental agreement for defendant’s storage unit itself showed there was no reasonable expectation of privacy in the unit if the landlord suspected unlawful or unsafe use. Here, there was a dog sniff outside the door. “Because Defendant consented to … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Storage unit rental agreement consented to landlord entry

W.D.La.: Protective sweep for AK-47 was reasonable on knock-and-talk for weapon, denial of entry, and smelling MJ; one officer was to leave for SW

Police properly conducted a protective sweep for an AK-47 after a knock-and-talk did not gain entry. Police had an anonymous source, and defendant was an alleged felon in possession, and they went for a knock-and-talk. Defendant refused to consent, and … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Inevitable discovery, Knock and talk, Protective sweep, Staleness | Comments Off on W.D.La.: Protective sweep for AK-47 was reasonable on knock-and-talk for weapon, denial of entry, and smelling MJ; one officer was to leave for SW

M.D.Pa.: Error in USPS tracking number of parcel in SW was a “mere technical error” when it was readily apparent they had right package

Error as to USPS tracking number in an anticipatory warrant wasn’t fatal and didn’t make the warrant not particular. All the other information was correct as to sender, recipient, description, and shipping location. This was a “mere technical error” that … Continue reading

Posted in Anticipatory warrant, Particularity, Staleness | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Error in USPS tracking number of parcel in SW was a “mere technical error” when it was readily apparent they had right package

NH: Tenant showed a REP in apt building’s utility closet, but not in vestibule

On the totality under the state constitution, defendant had a reasonable expectation of privacy for a pair of wet boots hidden in a utility closet in an apartment building’s vestibule closet. He manifested the expectation of privacy by his actions, … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on NH: Tenant showed a REP in apt building’s utility closet, but not in vestibule

IN: Admin. inspector’s entry onto yard for housing code violation didn’t violate 4A

A city inspector followed state statute and entered upon a homeowner’s property after he saw a deck and above ground pool being built in violation of the local housing code. The entry was reasonable and did not require a administrative … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonableness | Comments Off on IN: Admin. inspector’s entry onto yard for housing code violation didn’t violate 4A

E.D.Va.: Attorney memorandum could be seized in plain view during search; 5A privilege was waived

In a criminal copyright infringement case, a search warrant issued, and the police seized an attorney memorandum in plain view. The court finds the attorney-client privilege was waived by prior disclosure to others. United States v. Dallmann, 2020 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Privileges | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: Attorney memorandum could be seized in plain view during search; 5A privilege was waived

ProPublica: Police Say Seizing Property Without Trial Helps Keep Crime Down. A New Study Shows They’re Wrong.

ProPublica: Police Say Seizing Property Without Trial Helps Keep Crime Down. A New Study Shows They’re Wrong. By Ian McDougall (“Civil asset forfeiture laws, which allow police to seize property without trial, are frequently justified as tools to seize millions … Continue reading

Posted in Forfeiture | Comments Off on ProPublica: Police Say Seizing Property Without Trial Helps Keep Crime Down. A New Study Shows They’re Wrong.

OH6: When lack of PC for a SW is the issue, a suppression hearing isn’t required: it’s a question of law

When the defendant moves to suppress a search warrant claiming only a lack of probable cause, a hearing isn’t required. It’s then a mixed question of law and fact (mostly law). State v. Holt, 2020-Ohio-6649, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 4515 … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Standards of review, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on OH6: When lack of PC for a SW is the issue, a suppression hearing isn’t required: it’s a question of law

OR: Questions about drugs without RS during a traffic stop exceeded the basis of the stop

“ Officers conducting a traffic stop may only conduct investigation unrelated to that traffic stop if they have independent constitutional justification for further inquiries. Neither line of inquiry here (first, whether defendant had drugs, and second whether she illegally possessed … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on OR: Questions about drugs without RS during a traffic stop exceeded the basis of the stop

N.D.Ohio: Lack of CI’s track record can be overlooked with corroboration of the story

The CI’s track record wasn’t disclosed but the corrobation was. Probable cause was shown. “Here, Detective Shelton’s affidavit established probable cause. Shelton’s affidavit relayed the informant’s statement that Defendant Butts was manufacturing Fentanyl tablets using Drug Mart brand pain medication. … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Waiver | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Lack of CI’s track record can be overlooked with corroboration of the story

Today is Bill of Rights Day

December 15, 1791 the Bill of Rights was ratified by the states, 229 years ago.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Today is Bill of Rights Day

CA3: Pro se ptf stated claim for warrantless entry into his house

The district court erred in summarily dismissing plaintiff’s case at § 1915A screening for failure to state a claim, because he did in the attempted amended complaint. “Edwards alleged that Rice lacked a search warrant when she conducted an investigation … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Nexus, Reasonable suspicion, Search | Comments Off on CA3: Pro se ptf stated claim for warrantless entry into his house

PA: On PCR, def has to call the third-party consenter as a witness to attempt to show lack of consent

On post-conviction review, defendant didn’t call as a witness the person who consented to the entry to testify that she did so involuntarily. Therefore, he failed in his burden of proof. Defendant was properly subjected to a DV arrest, even … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Inventory, Standards of review | Comments Off on PA: On PCR, def has to call the third-party consenter as a witness to attempt to show lack of consent

N.D.Iowa: SI to arrest can support search even when officers choose not to arrest at that moment

The search incident exception supported the search here because it was factually and legally appropriate except for the fact that the actual arrest didn’t occur until months later. The officers chose not to arrest at that moment. United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Search incident | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: SI to arrest can support search even when officers choose not to arrest at that moment