Daily Archives: December 17, 2020

W.D.Ky.: PC to arrest for a drug crime doesn’t require a completed crime

Probable cause for arrest because of planning to commit a drug crime based on corroborated CI information without the drug transaction even happening. United States v. Kristopher, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 236421 (W.D. Ky. Dec. 16, 2020) [e.g., attempt, conspiracy]. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probable cause | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: PC to arrest for a drug crime doesn’t require a completed crime

TX: Flight from arrest on a warrant doesn’t permit litigating the validity of the warrant

There was an outstanding arrest warrant for defendant that justified the officer’s attempting to arrest him, and his flight justified his conviction for evading. The exclusionary rule doesn’t reach down to the actual validity of the warrant and the statute … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on TX: Flight from arrest on a warrant doesn’t permit litigating the validity of the warrant

NBC News: Bodycam footage of botched police raid in Chicago sparks outrage

NBC News: Bodycam footage of botched police raid in Chicago sparks outrage (“The video of the February 2019 raid shows police officers handcuffed a naked woman and searched her home for nearly an hour before realizing they raided the wrong … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on NBC News: Bodycam footage of botched police raid in Chicago sparks outrage

CA11: Dist Ct acted within its discretion denying a suppression motion as untimely

Defense counsel waited past the pretrial motions deadline to file a motion to suppress complaining that he needed a state court transcript, but that hearing was long ago. The district court acted within its discretion in denying the motion for … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on CA11: Dist Ct acted within its discretion denying a suppression motion as untimely

OH5: Def’s large knife on his belt justified patdown for additional weapons

“We concur with the trial court that Officer Sholl had a sufficient reasonable objective basis under the totality of the circumstances to frisk appellant for weapons. Appellant had a large fixed blade knife on his belt loop. A pat down … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause | Comments Off on OH5: Def’s large knife on his belt justified patdown for additional weapons

WY: Questions about travel plans are allowed to put trip in “context”

Basic questions about where defendant and his passenger were going were reasonable to put their trip into “context.” That led to reasonable suspicion. Pryce v. State, 2020 WY 151, 2020 Wyo. LEXIS 178 (Dec. 16, 2020). (And one could ask: … Continue reading

Posted in Digital Searches, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on WY: Questions about travel plans are allowed to put trip in “context”

DE: Actual presence of accused not required for suppression hearing and video appearance constitutional

A virtual suppression hearing that was a mixed question of law and fact didn’t require the actual presence of the accused under the Sixth Amendment’s confrontation clause, following United States v. Rosenschein, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 129889 (D.N.M. July 23, … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on DE: Actual presence of accused not required for suppression hearing and video appearance constitutional

N.D.Iowa: SW affidavit was sloppy and partly misleading, but not intentionally so

“A substantial basis existed for the court to determine probable cause existed on the face of the warrant affidavit.” It was, however, sloppy and partly misleading, but, on the totality there is no Franks violation. United States v. Johnson, 2020 … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Standards of review | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: SW affidavit was sloppy and partly misleading, but not intentionally so

M.D.Fla.: Storage unit rental agreement consented to landlord entry

The rental agreement for defendant’s storage unit itself showed there was no reasonable expectation of privacy in the unit if the landlord suspected unlawful or unsafe use. Here, there was a dog sniff outside the door. “Because Defendant consented to … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Storage unit rental agreement consented to landlord entry