Monthly Archives: August 2020

CA11: SI of notebook in def’s purse was reasonable without PC as to it

A notebook in defendant’s purse was properly searched incident to her arrest, even without probable cause it contained evidence. United States v. Ouedraogo, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 25519 (11th Cir. Aug. 12, 2020):

Posted in Search incident | Comments Off on CA11: SI of notebook in def’s purse was reasonable without PC as to it

NJ: Once SW issues for cell phone, foregone conclusion exception to self-incrimination applies and password can be compelled

Once a search warrant issues for a cell phone, there is no privilege of self-incrimination in the phone barring compelled production of the password. The foregone conclusion exception to the Fifth Amendment applies. State v. Andrews, A-72-18 (N.J. Aug. 10, … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Privileges | Comments Off on NJ: Once SW issues for cell phone, foregone conclusion exception to self-incrimination applies and password can be compelled

CA7: Prison inmates have 4A reasonableness protection against abusive strip and body cavity searches

Prison inmates retain a Fourth Amendment reasonableness right against abusive strip and body cavity searches enough to state a claim here. Qualified immunity is reserved for later. Henry v. Hulett, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 25390 (7th Cir. Aug. 11, 2020) … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA7: Prison inmates have 4A reasonableness protection against abusive strip and body cavity searches

CA11: Def’s failure to claim cell phone once it was released was abandonment

Police released defendant’s cell phone two days after its seizure, but defendant never sought to recover it. This was considered an abandonment. Standing to challenge CSLI could be an issue because the phones weren’t claimed, but, without deciding that, the … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on CA11: Def’s failure to claim cell phone once it was released was abandonment

N.D.Ill.: Reasonable reliance on apparent authority is good faith in itself

Reasonable reliance on apparent authority to consent is good faith. “And relying on consent in good faith is circular and redundant. Whether there is apparent authority to consent already addresses the officers’ good-faith belief in the consenters’ authority. Put differently, … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Probable cause | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: Reasonable reliance on apparent authority is good faith in itself

CA11: While unclear whether 4A applies to pretrial detainees, 14A does and standards the same

As pretrial detainee, it’s unclear whether the Fourth Amendment applies to his claims. The Fourteenth Amendment clearly does, and, in any event the standards would be applied the same. Patel v. Lanier County, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 25345 (11th Cir. … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on CA11: While unclear whether 4A applies to pretrial detainees, 14A does and standards the same

AZ: Offer of proof would be helpful for Franks claim, and def didn’t make one here

“As noted above, however, some of these alleged omissions and misstatements are simply not supported by the record. And, the omissions that are supported by the record were not material given the strength of the evidence supporting a finding of … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Exclusionary rule, Franks doctrine, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on AZ: Offer of proof would be helpful for Franks claim, and def didn’t make one here

D.Nev.: Ptf’s claim he was held past his sentence expiring stated a 4A claim

Plaintiff’s claim he was held in jail past his sentence expiration date survives summary judgment as a Fourth Amendment claim. Barrese v. Las Vegas Metro. Police Dep’t, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 143360 (D. Nev. Aug. 10, 2020). The trial court … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Ptf’s claim he was held past his sentence expiring stated a 4A claim

N.D.Cal.: “chemical agents, less lethal projectiles such as rubber bullets and flashbang grenades” against peaceful protesters states enough to stay in court

Plaintiffs were alleged peaceful protesters in Oakland claiming excessive force was used against them: “chemical agents, less lethal projectiles such as rubber bullets and flashbang grenades.” They provided video evidence. They stated enough of a claim at this point to … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: “chemical agents, less lethal projectiles such as rubber bullets and flashbang grenades” against peaceful protesters states enough to stay in court

D.Me.: No exigent circumstances for BAC blood sample without SW

A Park Ranger in Acadia National Park in Maine followed Maine law to get a blood sample without a search warrant. There were no exigent circumstances, and the blood sample is suppressed. United States v. Manubolu, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on D.Me.: No exigent circumstances for BAC blood sample without SW

NY3: Stop justified by traffic offense, despite racial pretext claim

Defendant’s stop was justified by a traffic offense, despite claims it might have been racially motivated. People v. Price, 2020 NY Slip Op 04430, 2020 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4532 (3d Dept. Aug. 6, 2020). See the concurring opinion:

Posted in Pretext | Comments Off on NY3: Stop justified by traffic offense, despite racial pretext claim

CA7: “Extensive police corroboration” of CI’s story was PC

Defendant’s appellate argument the CI’s information wasn’t probable cause is rejected. “[T]he extensive police corroboration detailed in the affidavit strongly supports the issuing judge’s probable cause determination. … [¶] Next, on the second and third factors, Bonz had firsthand knowledge … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA7: “Extensive police corroboration” of CI’s story was PC

CA9: It was well established that “illegal presence” in the U.S. was not a crime, so ptf’s arrest was unreasonable

Illegal entry is a crime, but not mere presence, and that was well established since 2012. Defendant’s arrest of plaintiff in a courtroom as a witness on suspicion of being here illegally at the request of a JP was unreasonable. … Continue reading

Posted in Immigration arrests, Qualified immunity, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA9: It was well established that “illegal presence” in the U.S. was not a crime, so ptf’s arrest was unreasonable

Townhall: One of America’s Largest Cities Is Using a 1984 Tactic to Find Quarantine Violators

Townhall: One of America’s Largest Cities Is Using a 1984 Tactic to Find Quarantine Violators by Beth Baumann:

Posted in Digital privacy, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Townhall: One of America’s Largest Cities Is Using a 1984 Tactic to Find Quarantine Violators

ABA: A Practitioner’s Guide to Police Use of Genealogy Sites and the Fourth Amendment

ABA: A Practitioner’s Guide to Police Use of Genealogy Sites and the Fourth Amendment by Antony Barone Kolenc (in Criminal Justice magazine)

Posted in DNA | Comments Off on ABA: A Practitioner’s Guide to Police Use of Genealogy Sites and the Fourth Amendment

CA8: Apparent purchase on the street justified patdown

Defendant and companion observed buying drugs from someone on the street in a car and getting back to their car was reasonable suspicion. “There was ‘more’ here [than in Ybarra], however, for the officer had been told that two men … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA8: Apparent purchase on the street justified patdown

Cal.3: Plain view of possession of more than a recreational amount of drugs was PC

Defendant’s detention was reasonable, and, during the stop, three large bags of marijuana were seen on the floor of the car. Possession of under an ounce is legal, but this was more than an ounce, so continuing the detention for … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Probable cause | Comments Off on Cal.3: Plain view of possession of more than a recreational amount of drugs was PC

D.Minn.: Two SWs on consecutive days were part of same investigation so they aren’t severed for trial

Two search warrants on consecutive days produced drug counts against defendant. They are part of the same investigation, so they are joined for trial. United States v. Martin, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 141845 (D. Minn. July 6, 2020). Ineffective assistance … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Two SWs on consecutive days were part of same investigation so they aren’t severed for trial

CA5: Forthwith SDT of doctor’s office could state 4A claim

A forthwith subpoena duces tecum to gather medical records in a doctor’s office by the Texas Medical Board with the DEA in tow appears to state a Fourth Amendment claim here for the subpoena being used for criminal investigative purposes, … Continue reading

Posted in Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on CA5: Forthwith SDT of doctor’s office could state 4A claim

E.D.N.C.: Driveway isn’t always curtilage under Collins

Defendant’s driveway was not enough curtilage to make it unreasonable for the police to come on the driveway and look at his car. It wasn’t covered, and there was a road and open field right next to it. United States … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: Driveway isn’t always curtilage under Collins